yes the Models are not very good at predictions - science is very precise but not very accurate. For example we know from science that Jupiter and Saturn periodically resonate in their orbits - and this resonance changes Jupiter from protecting Earth from comets and asteroids - and so every few hundred million years - the resonance of Saturn and Jupiter lines up and then this causes an asteroid or comet to hit Earth. But science can not predict WHEN this will happen. Actually it's only through supercomputer iterations that the results are achieved - without the math involved enabling any deductions. Math professor of quantum chaos - Steve Strogatz - he has stated that science now is inherently "authoritarian" because of our dependence on the supercomputer iterations to make our predictions. I have corresponded with Professor Strogatz.
But empirical data is often not incorporated into the above models - since even a supercomputer can not model say the ecology of the Amazon rainforest - it's just too complex. So for global warming, for example, cloud dynamics are not included in the models. Nor is the East Siberian Arctic Shelf methane "bomb." So we now know that cloud sulfur aerosol pollution has prevented the Earth from doubling in warming due to CO2 increase from industrial activity. So that is called the McFearSun Mustache Paradox. In other words - the more "Leftist" renewable energy that is propagated for a Liberal Elite Technological UN control of the EArth - the more the Earth will warm due to lack of sulfur aerosol pollution. This is not insignificant and the effect is localized - hence India and China would be MUCH warmer were it not for all their coal pollution smog.
Here's a good example of some empirical data not included in the global warming supercomputer models.
So these are newly discovered previous methane bomb blowouts.
So we can look to the past - this has happened before. Only now the scale of time is much faster - an order of magnitude faster than any previous extinction.
http://sciencenordic.com/giant-gas-craters-discovered-bottom-barents-sea
Cracked gas chambers in the seabed south of Svalbard could blow out and create craters that are up to 30 metres deep, say scientists.
OK let's go back to our asteroid/Comet analogy. It's happened before right - but science can not predict exactly when - due to the inherent quantum chaos dynamics involved. It's nonlinear resonance and so only the "iterations" can make the prediction. Small changes in initial conditions can have great resonance changes in the outcome.ok so what about an asteroid or comet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgqkbzG8xGM
An intimate, personal, honest, frank, direct conversation with Climate Change specialist Arek Sinanian, author of 'A Climate For Denial" and one of the international participant to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)...because scientists, specialists, analysts, consultants and other Climate Change professionals are also normal human beings like you and me....worried about the same daily life issues as you and me regarding Climate Change and asking the same questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment