Monday, March 23, 2026

AI generated Leonard Susskind on the speed of light as a conversion factor of spacetime

 I'm going to email him.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43zLoCeTbCE

Hi Professor Leonard Susskind: There is no reference given for this "lecture" by you yet there are several yt channels posting this same talk. I recommend suing those channels unless you can provide a reference. I guess this AI talk has you saying that "Einstein lied." 
thanks,
drew w. hempel
 
 AI on lorentz transforms are asymmetric:
Lorentz transformations are
not inherently "asymmetric" in the fundamental sense of physics; they are fully symmetric between inertial observers. However, they can appear mathematically asymmetric depending on how you represent them as matrices or coordinate transformations.
Here is the breakdown of why this confusion often arises.
1. The Physics is Symmetric
The core of Special Relativity is the Principle of Relativity: the laws of physics are identical in all inertial frames. If Observer A sees Observer B moving at velocity
, then Observer B sees Observer A moving at velocity
.
  • The Lorentz transformation from frame
    to
    is defined by velocity
    .
  • The inverse transformation from
    to
    is defined by velocity
    .
  • Because the structure of Minkowski spacetime is the same for both, neither observer is "preferred" or "special." The relationship is perfectly reciprocal.
2. Why they look asymmetric (The "Matrix" view)
When you write Lorentz transformations as
matrices (
), they often appear asymmetric.
  • Boosts are symmetric matrices: A "pure" boost (moving in a straight line without rotation) is represented by a symmetric matrix.
  • General transformations are not: A general Lorentz transformation includes both boosts and spatial rotations. Because rotations are represented by orthogonal (non-symmetric) matrices, the product of a boost and a rotation generally results in an asymmetric matrix.
  • Basis-dependent: Whether a matrix is symmetric is a property of the coordinate basis, not the underlying physical transformation. If you change your basis (for example, by rotating your axes), a transformation that looked symmetric might suddenly look asymmetric.
3. Asymmetry in "Perspective"
Sometimes, when people describe Lorentz transformations as "asymmetric," they are referring to the effects rather than the mathematical transformation itself.
  • Time dilation and length contraction: It is common to focus on one frame "doing the measuring" of the other. While both frames agree that the other clock is running slow, an individual observer sees a specific, one-way result in their own measurements. This isn't an asymmetry in the laws of physics, but a consequence of the relative perspective.
Summary
If by "asymmetric" you mean that the physics treats two inertial frames differently, that is false. If you mean that the matrices used to perform the calculations are not always symmetric matrices, that is true—but it is a feature of linear algebra and coordinate choice, not a breakdown of the symmetry of spacetime.
  • special relativity - Postulate implies existence Lorentz transformation?
    Jan 5, 2017 — I don't see what the postulates have to do with the existence of the Lorentz transformation. This transformation exists as a mathe...
    Physics Stack Exchange
  • The Symmetric Lorentz Transformations - v6 - viXra.org
    * 1. Introduction. The Lorentz transformation equations are the mathematical framework of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity.
    viXra.org
  • Problem 49 Prove that the symmetry (or anti... [FREE SOLUTION]
    In the context of the Lorentz transformation, if a tensor is symmetric in one inertial frame, it remains symmetric in any other fr...
    www.vaia.com
Show all

Omega 3 boosts brown fat production of thermogenesis heat as cold resistance

 Omega 3 discussed as per extreme sardine diet

He's habituated to sardine smell that he emitted out of his skin - omega 3

 

Sunday, March 22, 2026

CA1 and CA2 region of Hippocampus proven to store social memories (as origin of fear and anxiety): Mice & humans!

 the researchers for the first time reveal that CA1 and CA2 respectively encode the locations and individuals linked with a threatening experience. The results show that, beyond simply recognizing individuals, CA2 helps record more complex aspects of social memory: in this case, whether another individual is safe or risky. The scientists published their findings October 15 in the journal Nature Neuroscience.

"It's vital to all species that live in social communities, including mice and humans, to have social memories that can help one avoid future experiences with others that might prove harmful while keeping ourselves open to individuals who may be beneficial," said Pegah Kassraian, PhD, a postdoctoral research fellow in the Siegelbaum lab and lead author of the new study.

 https://zuckermaninstitute.columbia.edu/fearful-memories-others-seen-mouse-brain

 Silencing dCA2 during encoding or recall trials disrupted social fear discrimination memory...When they silenced CA2, the mice remembered where they were shocked, but became indiscriminately afraid of both strangers they met. 

 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-024-01771-8

 CA2 helps mice remember whether past encounters with others were threatening or safe. The results also are consistent with prior research detailing how CA1 is home to place cells, which encode locations. 

 When the scientists silenced CA1, the mice could no longer remember where they were zapped, but they could still remember which stranger was associated with the threat.

 

 

James Rilling: Left side brain dominance default resting state proven in humans and proven to not exist in chimpanzees!

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXwCHbhdeko

 Humans have much larger left brain regions for language than chimpanzees.

Humans show a default resting state with left brain dominance demonstrating "thinking in words."

 

PBS Permafrost Methane doc discoveries faults to ancient geological 1.2 trillion tons of methane!

 https://www.pbs.org/video/arctic-sinkholes-9jwenj/

there's also 1200 gigatons (1.2 trillion tons) of pressurized methane in the world's largest ocean shelf, East Siberian Arctic Shelf, and arctic permafrost 
and the taliks have melted down to 50 gigatons of subsurface methane that should soon have an "abrupt eruption" doubling atmospheric temperatures soon.
As the above fascinating and scary doc reveals - the computer global warming models IGNORED this methane! oops. Goto http://arctic-news.blogspot.com for more details.
 
Here is Natalia Shakhova Ph.D. researcher who used to be at U of Alaska-Fairbanks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx1Jxk6kjbQ This next vid mentions Peter Wadham's book "Farewell to Ice" that I got into the Marine library - it might still be on the shelf!  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osmzTSYRJJE I haven't actually read that book yet though. hahaha. 
"Increased methane fluxes could occur as numerous weak seeps or as strong bubble plumes over large areas. Due to the shallow depth of the ESAS, it is possible that the majority of methane released avoids oxidation and escapes to the atmosphere."
That link lists her most recent research.
"Brief, transient spikes of CH4 concentration from localized gas seep sources do not represent the dominant sea-to-atmosphere flux in the studied ESAS region." 
Those scientists try to refute her research team claims but I don't think they are accurate.
"We demonstrate that, under suitable circumstances, some of the 96.5% of methane bound in deeper water distal hydrates can reach the seafloor and vent into the ocean beyond the landward limit of marine hydrate. This reservoir should therefore be considered for estimating climate change-induced methane release during a warming world."
That study does not even cite Shakhova but corroborates her claim....
 
AI is claiming the above is hyperbole - thereby proving that AI is delusional. 

Alcohol Mouthwash should only be used ONCE a day: too much acetaldehyde created as carcinogen!

 Subjects who had used the mouthwash longer (>35 years) also had an increased risk of upper airway cancer (OR: 1.15; 95%CI = 1.01 - 1.30), as well as those using it more than once per day (OR: 1.31; 95%CI = 1.09 - 1.58).

As in the previous two studies, Guha N. et al. () confirmed the positive relationship between mouthwash use and cancer (oral, pharynx or larynx cancer).....

In this study, a significant increase of acetaldehyde concentration in saliva was observed in the three samples of mouthwash with ethanol at 30 seconds, 2 and 5 minutes, with a subsequent decrease. The maximum peak was between 30 seconds and 2 minutes. On the other hand, Gandini et al. () did not find differences in oral or pharyngeal cancer according to mouthwash use (OR: 1.13; 95%CI = 0.95 - 1.35). No differences were found between mouthwash use and non-use in terms of risk for oral cancer (RR: 0.99, 95%CI = 0.75 - 1.31, I2 = 19%, P-χ2 = 0.30).

The relative risk summary estimates for 1-3 times a day of mouthwash showed a dose dependent trend but with no statistically significant increased risk for oral cancer, compared to no exposure: 1.19 (95%CI = 0.95 – 1.5), 1.42 (95%CI = 0.91 – 2.24) and 1.7 (95%CI = 0.86 – 3.35), respectively, with I2 = 76% and Chy-square p<0.001....

 The acetaldehyde levels in saliva were significantly higher in subjects who occasionally washed their teeth (c1) and in subjects with 1-2 washes/day (c2) than in subjects with ≥3 daily washes (c3) (Kruskal-Wallis: 13.19, p<0.01),

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6982979/ 

 So make sure to wash out the mouth and brush the teeth after alcohol-based mouthwash is used!

 

 

Saturday, March 21, 2026

Elephantine Egypt proves the Goddess Queen of Heaven was still active to Jewish Temple worship

 "the triad of Elephantine could have been formed only in Egypt; but the presupposition to see in Yhwh a god among other gods, who can have a goddess for a wife and another deity as a child, must have been a preservation of the Elephantines and not merely acquired in Egypt. Yaho was believed to be a deity with a Dionysian side. He drank wine in large quantities and liked to hear music. he had a partner called Anat (Anat-Bethel or Anat-Yaho . . .), also known as the Queen of Heaven. The Amherst papyrus further indicates that Judeans at Elephantine were at least a mix of Judeans and Samarians or Samaritans, and both worshiped Isis or Ishtar alongside Yahweh" 

https://vridar.org/2024/04/09/questioning-the-hellenistic-date-for-the-hebrew-bible-elephantine-jews/