So I was listening to this NOVA program on global warming - the first half was very good but the 2nd half I was already familiar with - and so I googled "noncommutative eigenfrequencies." I got a fascinating hit - as a chapter on a pdf - and began digging in.... it is promotion of symmetric mathematics - and yet it acknowledges the problem of science thus far. At first I thought - maybe this is a spoof? I mean they acknowledge precisely the issue I have focused on - but then try to present a solution to it - and relate it back to economics and sustainability. So I looked up the authors - no they are the "real" deal - one invented the 3D printer!! The Other is a big wig "consultant" of multinational corporations....both professors....
So first of all - let's deal with them encapsulating the conundrum of science that I have been pointing out for the last ten years but recently described in terms of the problem of defining time as a spatial circle measurement that is supposedly symmetric - when it is not!!
O.K. so the authors are in the process of creating a "new" mathematics to justify what they have just admitted is the actual "irreversibility" of time - despite science thus far assuming that time is symmetric and reversible! Later on they refer back to this earlier assumption they set up and expand on why it is a problem in science:
So these authors are admitting that science at a fundamental level is at odds with human reality. And so argue that an "analog substitute" by the humans can then make up for the difference in the reversible time and the actual time that is not reversible - in terms of the entropy produced. So the authors then argue that when time is considered to be "complex" then the "singularity" of time that allows it to be reversible again is the actual mathematics of the scientist doing these analog approximations as "addition."
And more so - this process then "proves" the Riemann Hypothesis that predicts the distribution of prime numbers!
In other words the reason the Riemann Hypothesis remains unproveable is because it is a singularity of the limit of the process of time as being reversible in mathematics. And they argue that "normally" engineers do not take this complex time into consideration but in fact it is the difference between the inherent "uncertainty" of quantum mechanics and the "incompleteness" of mathematical axioms, as Godel proved:
And so it is precisely the "hidden" reciprocal inversion of zero and infinity as time parameters - that is then the scientist's mathematical process as a philosophy of the singularity in action - this is of course just a rehashing of Platonic philosophy - although the authors might not be aware of this. haha. Except the fact that the paper does rely on their Platonic interpretation of Greek Philosophy to justify their argument (Aion and two other views of time). Their definition of Aion, is, of course wrong, since they don't know the secret of Aion as incubation meditation kundalini time reversal as negentropy - not just an eternal cycle as they claim it is.
And so a la Plato - then we get "time as the image of eternity" - by using mathematics as some kind of Demiurge - or what they call the Idempotent-Monad:
So their big "claim" then is with their new mathematics time can no longer be reduced to zero but instead the environment has to be considered as an inherent noncommutative scaling factor of time - with entropy or anti-entropy.
So then they claim, very assiduously, that the mathematics - with the typical circular reasoning of mathematicians, means that they're reversal of the symmetric time into asymmetric time, as a singularity, is NOT in fact the human process of the scientist (who had previously made an error in the math for the last 2000 years) but rather it is the secret of WHY the Riemann Hypothesis can not be proven yet is true:
This is, as I mentioned, backed up by referring to Greek Philosophy, of course. But goes back to math professor Steve Strogatz calling the Riemann Hypothesis a "conspiracy between nature and number, atom and arithmetic" - and when I posted that online with my commentary, suddenly his promo on the hard cover was removed from the promos on the soft cover. haha. Hilarious. So now that is all set up - we (meaning the authors) can return to their main topic - MONEY! haha. So first reviewed is this basic logarithmic/exponential math based on a closed spatial time - that now must be changed:
And so - what was a problem of science up till now - can be miraculous solved by economists!
But first we (the authors) admit that up till now economics has been wrong! Yes I pointed this out in my classic paper: The Incorrect Supply and D
No comments:
Post a Comment