https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtvaClPfqKI
They're ALL the same Force: The SuperStrong Force.
There's three frequencies, the sum, difference and the fundamental....those forces are far stronger than gravitational...they are uber forces. ..they are stronger than strong...You have fields that are canceling, to underwind it you have to uncancel it and that's a vastly deep potential well... in a topological vortex...it's not just stable...it's immensely strong...the masses being crystallized into one of these particles...they are things that must happen...there's no such thing as resistance...
The current in the electron is 20 amps, you're talking about 20 amps of current going around a tiny circle at 10 to the minus 13 meters...try and engineer that! We're talking about something that is immensely strong...the superstrong force which is what I was just talking about, whatever is holding the electron together is stronger than the strong force....Electron rocks are stronger rocks than proton rocks - obviously! They're all the same force...
SuperStrong Force is the Exclusion Principle underlying Heisenberg Uncertainty...the mass of the electron is an inverse container....
"The SuperStrong Force...I would just call that counting...you're starting with integers, you're starting with the discrete" - Professor Garnet Ord
That little bit of spacetime is missing...and if that little bit of spacetime is a box, the outside of the box, and that little bit of the box inside is the general relativistic bending, exactly, it's a shadow for any other particle....and if you do the sums...you get the 40 odd orders of magnitude difference between electromagnetism and gravitation that everybody worries about...
You're looking at this recursion...a piece of the universe is missing as you change inertial frames...If you're going very fast, you lose half the universe...that part of losing half the universe is exactly the recursion you're talking about..[the red shift] in terms of the twin paradox...you're going tic taaaaaaak, it's like a heart beat [noncommutative asymmetric] and that is counting, digitally counting, discretely counting, the part of the universe which exists for wont. ...
Here you have both, digital on one hand and continuous on the other - there it is in the maths, with the transformations between them. ...you got the continuous side of things, the frequency goes up, the continuous rate of phase goes up. It's just Pythagoras, it just gets a longer path...so any kind of recursive system is going to have this picture of a pair of frequencies diverge and produce a beat....
De Broglie pointed this out at the time....[critique of Dirac]..."since they are not real" - he means they are imaginary....and then what he [Dirac] does is he throws them out! At least Dirac says it, if you read any other relativistic quantum textbook, they go straight to the Heisenberg...they are missing the complex terms... and then those have solutions which are complex solutions... the solutions are put in from nonrelativistic quantum mechanics...And this is the whole thing that has destroyed physics for so long! You assume there's a Lagranian, you assume there's some phase term, you assume there's some action...you're presuming the action is giving you a rate of change in some wavefunction but the wavefunction you put in is a complex wavefunction! You've just blown your mind up... you've destroyed the possibility of putting in anything more than a Commuting Complex Wavefunction - it's far too simple!! You can't describe two phases with one phase!...You're already lost and everything you do from there, and that's everything from 1950 for the entire physics community is blind to that! You've blinded yourself by forcing yourself what is essentially a nonrelativistic wavefunction... de Broglie pointed this out - the wavefunctions are frame dependent! It always have been - in every single one - in all the books - they're all bloody frame dependent - that is so stupid!! [32 minutes]
Relativistic quantum mechanics doesn't work...looks what's missing - look what Dirac threw out! ...he's thrown out the electric field term, the charge term. The charge term is missing. He's trying to describe an electron and a positron without the charge term! Forget about it...The reason he can't do it is because...he missed a quaternion...the reason ...it's not understandable in a complex...it's the wrong "i" - he's used "i" for two different things. They're different "i"s. ...
It's an inversion, a total inversion and it has to be an inversion because only an inversion of a field is going to give you a scalar exchange of energy....it's an inversion...of any complex distribution which is not scalar, which is fields, it could be currents, it could be angular momentum...The only way to find something which takes something which is 16 degrees of freedom, is to find the inversion for that whole thing! So you need something that is both an inversion of the field, an inversion field that was worked out by Martin [van der Mark] as well but also the inversion of space... We've known that for a long time, the inverse coordinate system is a conformal coordinate system...a conformal transformation, that particular one leads to a scalar. You have the field and inverse field. Field x inverse field is the scalar and that's the interaction, the interaction requires energy, scalar stuff, to jump from A to B, and for that you need an inversion. The Basic operation is Inversion. But if you don't have all the bits - if you throw away the electric field part - what are you inverting!? You're NEVER going to find out what's going on! The inversion involves the whole field - not just bits of it....
That's where you go into the myst - mysticism, mystery, mystified.....You get into the Myst and as soon as you're in the Myst you can't get it. You can't see anything because you've already destroyed your eyes. You've already taken out what you need to see...The Missed Opportunity....
Do you know what's the real beautiful piece of work here? It's really de Broglie, it's de Broglie - that was a feat of imagination, a feat of intellectual leap forward of the highest degree...to find that there are two oscillations which are everywhere and at all times in phase, and yet are different frequencies, they move through one another seamlessly because of the Lorentz transformation...that's what gave the wave aspect of quantum mechanics....[in Schroedringer] you pull down the momentum...to generate wavelengths and frequencies...and that's beautiful but it's not beautiful enough.
They transform through Peter [Rowland's noncommutative - the exponential determines what's happening with the differential - that process gives something that squares to zero] nilpotents... photon wavefunctions...
The basic size of the electron, The noncommutative torus, is Lambda (wavelength) x speed of light (C) over 4pi and that's the 1/2 spin Origin of charge and explains WHY charge is not infinity...
John G. Williamson sums it up....in that vid excerpt
quantum collapse is intimately involved with this idea of inversion...pretty much exponentials and harmonics...it's basically music....we need to understand what's holding the electron together....the process of emission, not the probability of emission...the photon brings everything to the same point in spacetime, instantaneous in the photon frame, no space and no time...This is the (or a) process of photon creation and annihilation, and hence quantum collapse....
The photon is a mutual system of the emitter and the absorber, it's a resonance between the two of them. So for the photon that resonance is in the same point in spacetime....as a generated frequency as a modulation...as you're emitting a photon you generate a lower frequency, a much larger photon...a dipole phased array...an inversion...
If you look at anything it's always in the past and it's always coming from a higher energy object towards you: The direction of time is just the direction of energy flow.
"Anything that you observe must be discrete and discreteness comes from anti[non]commutativity. Measurement is discrete." - Peter Rowlands
"If you have two observables then they don't commute with each other." - Lou Kauffman
You can do something that David Bohm talked about quite a bit...something has an implicit order,... it shouldn't be symmetrized, because it has an order...a commutator cancels one of the kinds of signs that can be, but there's more than one kind of sign. ... " John G. Williamson
three kinds of negative: magnitude, vector direction, chirality..."this kind of commutation, this kind of negativity"....
It's like what happens in the oscillation of a music instrument...Any music instrument will transfer from fundamental through a resonance harmonic vibration...this is a resonant harmonic vibration through space and time.https://elixirfield.blogspot.com/2019/09/revisiting-gold-as-law-of-phase-harmony.html
What you're doing is ... the level of cancellation of spin is even stronger than the level of cancellation of charge. Because the level of cancellation of spin..the rotating photon is still a wave, it's a Maxwell wave, it's related to the commensurability of the wave internally, in the field distribution of the electric and magnetic cancel...in the external part outside the motion. And the electric field by its necessity, since it's weaker, has to modulate with the outside world...Spin is first and then charge. Charge is a weaker configuration in my view...
No comments:
Post a Comment