The information about black hole formation is coded in the anti-self-adjoint part of the fermionic Hamiltonian of entangled STM atoms. Upon Hawking evaporation, this information is not lost. It is present in the evaporated
radiation, but at sub-Planckian length scales. To detect this correlation of entanglements in the Hawking radiation one will have to probe the radiation at sub-Planck scales, but that will again result in the probe becoming another new black hole!
Nonetheless, in spite of black holes turning up all over the place, it is possible to make a fully
predictable quantum computer using our matrix dynamics, in the laboratory, at least in princi-
ple. The computer and the apparatus that measures the outcome are the two sub-systems of a combined deterministic system with the condition that the total mass is less than Planck mass.
So that at all events a black hole formation is avoided. To make the quantum computer, a set of entangled STM atoms is employed, with the initial conditions of the matrix dynamics [i.e. initial values of matrix components] precisely known. Then the quantum computation part proceeds just as in a conventional quantum computer, noting that the number of qubits is small enough that the spontaneous localisation lifetime is much longer than the duration of the computation. When the time comes to measure the output (which will be one of the matrix components), the system interacts (deterministically) with a much larger collection of STM atoms (a second quantum system).
This step is analogous to an electron arriving at the photographic plate (measuring apparatus) in a double slit interference experiment. Except that, now the plate is replaced by a large entangled quantum system with total mass such that the non-unitary evolution becomes significant, and spontaneous localisation sets in rapidly, on a measurable time scale. The quantum superposition present in the quantum computer will decay, deterministically, to a predictable outcome, which can be programmed algorithmically, knowing the rules of the matrix dynamics. We have a quantum
Turing machine with predictability.
Professor Singh's hope is that physics will be able to test at this deeper level of reality. In terms of not being observable Sir Roger Penrose and Brian Josephson (both Nobel physicists) defer to quantum biology. So my own research is based in listening as logical inference and not observing. So even though there may not be physics achievable in terms of the truth of reality in fact the truth of our biology, if properly understand in terms of noncommutativity, already makes nonlocality perceivable. For example in a quiet room it is proven we can hear the amplitude or intensity of sound as a wavelength smaller than an atom! Also the corroboration of the Hameroff-Penrose model by Dr. Anirban Bandypadhyay is through ultrasound as quantum coherence from noncommutativity. Tinnitus research has proven that the highest frequency we hear externally actually resonates our brain internally at ultrasound thereby activating this quantum nonlocality. Finally it is also proven that musicians can hear up to ten times faster than "time-frequency uncertainty" and since time-frequency uncertainty arises from noncommutative nonlocality this demonstrates again direct perception of formless awareness as nonlocality. So the ultrasound frequency is actually the microsecond wavelength which is also the quantum coherence between the right and left ear. So Penrose and Hameroff cite the research of Benjamin Libet demonstrating our brain registers perception at the microsecond wavelength in terms of reacting to our finger being pricked but if only the cerebral cortex is activated then there is no stimulation. This proves as Penrose's latest talk on "Science of Consciousness" youtube channel that in fact our actual perception of reality is precognitive due to nonlocality. So to claim that physics can't prove nonlocality ignores the fact that as Basil J. Hiley emphasizes about David Bohm's model - it is not quantum mechanics but rather an inherent quantum organic process of reality as nonlocality. Also just as Professor T. Singh points out this nonlocality is actually a "fifth force" as Basil J. Hiley also points out. This "Fifth force" is also antigravitational as reverse time force.
Comments on the Mass of the Photon
B.G. Sidharth
International Institute for Applicable Mathematics & Information Sciences
Hyderabad (India) & Udine (Italy)
B.M. Birla Science Centre, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad
Returning to the mass of the photon, it can be argued that this is a result
of the non commutativity of spacetime at a micro scale.
Quantum twistor theory—and, indeed, as we shall be
seeing later (in Part D), also space-time curvature—involves considering twistors (and dua twistors) as non-commuting operators,
No comments:
Post a Comment