Thanks! I ordered the paperback. I'll start digging into the pdf. I just study science as "intellectual self-defense" for my meditation training. haha. Also to explain the ecological crisis today. Have you checked out http://arctic-news.blogspot.com ? That has excellent information. Also Dr. Jim Massa, the oceanographer who posts on youtube - and the infamous "Guy McPherson." Essentially there's over 240 Zettajoules of heat waiting to release out of the oceans and the arctic ice is melting from below. There's a "methane bomb" in the East Siberian Arctic Shelf - the biggest ocean shelf in the planet - as "methane hydrates" that are starting to release exponentially as Dr. Natalia Shakova has detailed, among others. The Aerosol Masking Effect is twice as bad as previously thought so that a 40% decrease in sulfur pollution will heat Earth another 1 degree Celsius.
So those are the main factors that lock us into "doom."
The structural cause of the doom is the wrong symmetric math logic that math Professor Luigi Borzacchini calls a "deep preestablished disharmony." As Alain Connes states almost all scientists do not want to deal with noncommutative math.
My personal approach is nonwestern music theory - and since Alain Connes uses music theory to explain noncommutatvity this corroborates my claim that nonwestern music theory is the practice of an alchemical mind-body transformation in harmony with the negentropy of the Universe as relativistic quantum biology. This practice was the focus of our original human culture, the San Bushmen, in the equatorial rainforest over 70,000 years ago.
So I guess I am an misanthrope in terms of modern humanity and I agree with Roger Penrose that life is based on the gravitational potential as negative entropy that decreases gravitational entropy. So that "civilization" as modern science claims to decrease the entropy of matter but in fact is increasing the gravitational entropy!
haha.
Still I do not have to agree with a book to enjoy it and I'm sure I will learn a lot from your book. Who knows? Maybe you will convince me that I am wrong.
Thanks again,
drew
Thanks for your contact and encouragement Dr. Volodymyr Krasnoholovets: Since you contacted me, I have been studying your research as there is ample analysis online. You invited Georges Lochak to meet with you. So I will order your book on that basis alone. thanks.
http://inerton.kiev.ua/46_the-concept-of-spin-in-the-submicroscopic-description.pdf
I wasn't aware that Rene Schwaller de Lubicz did logical math analysis? I knew of him from the expose research of Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince on "synarchy." You mean not be aware of this. I would not be supportive of any view of Schwaller de Lubicz.
My personal view is that of the noncommutative "fundamental time" as Penrose calls it or "primitive time" (Alain Connes term) or "primordial time" (math professor Louis Kauffman). So I don't think time is a byproduct of space. Also I don't advocate for the golden ratio. In noncommutative primordial time the "distance" is measured as "inverse frequency" that is noncommutative to time. So it's not measured in terms of "sets." So when you write the "the set-difference is the symmetric difference between sets" - this is not noncommutative.
So then you write that the "open subparts" are "not detectable by 3-D probes."
Yes this is why I rely on meditation that is beyond 3-D as listening is proven to be up to ten times faster than Fourier Uncertainty. You refer to the ancients discussing a "non-equilibrium" as the "primary scission." Yes this would be the noncommutative time-frequency based on listening as meditation.
http://inerton.kiev.ua/2022.03.29_Kyiv_and_Moscow.pdf
This is fascinating history. Unfortunately I consider today's tragedy to be of a deeper existential level going back to around the beginning of wheat-based monocultural farming in West Asia - and farming around the world also.
The "deformation coat" around the electron is basically the spin concept.
So from noncommutativity the arrow of time can be reversed so that the future overlaps with the past, thereby enabling precognition as the foundation of reality as Olivier Costa de Beauregard emphasizes. Beauregard claimed the asymmetry was based on the macroobservation - as you also seem to claim. Noncommutativity states the asymmetric is inherent to the foundation of reality as eternal motion that can not be observed but it can be listened to.
Also my view on "crop circles" is that they are manufactured by skilled humans as tricksters. These tricksters have already confessed and explained how they make the crop circles.
So when you define God as not-moving then this is the "Yuan Shen" in Daoism - it means the light is turned around to resonate its "relativistic mass" as protoconsciousness - the "gravitational potential" of light as Penrose calls "dark energy."
So as Penrose points out the "gravitational entropy" is the opposite of the entropy of matter. So when civilization claims to decrease the entropy of matter through technology this is actually increasing the gravitational entropy, thereby inherently destroying the negentropy that drives life on Earth.
So in terms of physics I follow Professor Basil J. Hiley and the deceased Eddie Oshins - both of whom think that the noncommutativity does not need to 'collapse" any "wavefunction." The noncommutativity resonates to the macroscale as the secret of the ancient "non-equilibrium" foundation as you point out about Plotinus.
Even still Plotinus is based on Plato who relies on the problem of the symmetric spatial definition of time.
The promotion of your book but this retired physicist is fascinating.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17K0BxWvyqwuXO7u-brZ9LwemXd7NScET/view
Beckwith, Andrew; Robertson, Glen A. (2009). [AIP SPACE, PROPULSION & ENERGY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL FORUM: SPESIF-2009 - Huntsville (Alabama) (24–26 February 2009)] AIP Conference Proceedings - Hypothetical Dark Matter∕Axion rockets: What can be said about Dark Matter in terms of space physics propulsion. , (), 276–284. doi:10.1063/1.3115506also very fascinating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-_VPRCtiUg
I corresponded with Steve Strogatz about 15 years ago and again very recently. As much as synchronization is crucial - the key factor is the noncommutative phase as the negative entropy that is the original "causative force" of the synchronization. So whether it's chaos or fractals the math is still based on symmetric logic.
ilbert, S. A., and Batelaan, H. (2007). Acoustic analog to quantum mechanical level splitting. Am.
J. Phys. 75(11), 1003; also in Faculty Publications, Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Paper 103, http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicsfacpub/103.
I will check that out. thanks
http://www.cmsim.eu/papers_pdf/april_2012_papers/3_CMSIM_2012_Krasnoholovets-Gandzha_2_323-335.pdf
http://jointlab.upol.cz/icssur2009/proceedings/Krasnoholovets-ICSSUR09.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment