It's just too bad that quantum mechanics is completely local in the physical sense of the word.
Me:
You need to study the weak measurement research of Yakir Aharonov and what professor Basil J. Hiley states on nonlocality:
"the physicists say
no to if I go to university to physics professor who knows a quantum
physicist I said "listen there's this entanglement all of this hitting
me" they will say yes we agree with you so so now would they explain
they will probably explain it's not in the same way as I explained it
because I've got the Bohm model which a lot of physicists refused to
talk about. Don't ask me why when I when I explained it to mathematicians and show them the math we don't they say well what's the problem it's what we do in mathematics always every day you've just separated a complex equation into two real equations oh that's fine no problem
"so what is that how did they put it into words they say oh it's quantum mechanics but but how did they react the relate to reality they don't care about that part they say I got an algorithm I got an equation which satisfies which gives me the right predictions but that's automatics what about the implications of them what do they say because after all that's not for us that's philosophy oh he's a philosopher don't want to speak to him
" I'm sorry that's that that's the reality well there are a lot of very eminent exceptions to that in the physics community that's clear and there if you go to to talk to Roger Penrose for example he will know that there is nonlocality there and he is worrying about that nonlocality but he has a different idea of how to deal with it and that is even scarier because it says that the space-time we as and as we know it is not the reality. There is something underlying it I've called it pre space John Wheeler called it pre geometry and in that space you can then talk about a local relations and now really going into my own speculations in other words space time is not our priority it isn't yes it's something we extract where from from this wholeness idea that I've been talking which is in line with what what we're discussing fit is it did absolutely
"oh yes I think it was the realization that locality could be a real relationship suddenly realizing that locality is not necessarily absolute that really made me much happier with the non-local entanglement results that people are getting and don't forget a non-local entanglement when I first first working on it people were saying you're wasting your time we know we know we know physics is local but then slowly ice to go lecture on this and I used to start saying oh I'm very sorry I'm going to introduce you to this and yeah when I started this I got a lot of hostility then 10 years down the line I went the same sort of return you be careful though to young students in the front of the lecture theater said why are you pushy footing around nonlocality we all know physics is non-local and we all know the world is non-local
"so you see this let's at least from that group there had been a paradigm change but do those students think about the implication of what you're talking I think some of them do if someone care-a-lot unfortunately I remember one of the old professors are coming and why are they wasting their time talking about this and I've never quite understood the dynamics of that whether or whether the older people felt I think it may be...."
Taher Gozel interview with Basil Hiley 1 of 2
No comments:
Post a Comment