What we did is a simple experiment, if there is a helical structure or a geometric phase generator, any device, if a photon falls on it, then that structure rotates the photon: so it generates a hologram, it projects a hologram. So what we did is a microtubule, you can take it out and you can... with resonance... since the 1930s it will have been measuring protein resonance. So there is nothing new of it. What we did is combination of quantum optics and microbe...
And microtubule we assigned on the neuron and then photon falls on it, and photon comes out. But when photon comes out photon interacts with different structures differently. For example if there water inside the microtubule they interact differently and protein interact differently and any other structure...
so we get many different rings of light, distinct rings of light because of that. So this is how the hologram is produced by this. So when neuron is fired, many different components are there for the neuron. So we with an antenna now we excite microtuble and those holograms become brightened, they get brighter. So we understand, ok they belong to them. So we can deconvolute this hologram.
So we think that somehow, my concern is that the neuron, spike is an electrical vortex...if you imagine a membrane at action it's an electrical field vortex. So I think somehow that electrical vortex and holographic projection are interrelated. ...
about 3 hour 30 minutes in as a reply to a question
Quantum mechanics depends on complex numbers. The whole structure of quantum mechanics really depends on complex numbers. People think of it as probabilities, but the probabilities are really the squares of the amplitudes of the complex numbers, so they're the square of the distance of the origin of the complex number.Roger Penrose
Penrose says this is the equation for the graviton.
So you got massless at both ends [End of the Universe and Before the Big Bang] - this very rarefied remote future could somehow be like the very very hot, very very dense Big Bang - so long as there is nothing there with any rest mass, such as photons. And then they don't register the size of the Universe, they only know the conformal structure. So the idea was, if you have either the remote future, when it's photons... or the Big Bang, where it's so hot, that things are moving around so fast, that the rest mass makes not a hoot of difference, they are more or less massless. Everything is massless before the Big Bang. So you've got massless at both ends and massless things don't know the difference between big and small - so this very rarefied remote future, behaves just like a very hot, very dense Big Bang. Crazy idea, absolutely crazy, but it seemed to make physical sense: That you could make a Big Bang of a remote future of a previous eon. And our remote Future will become the Big Bang of another eon.
https://accelconf.web.cern.ch/e06/papers/thespa01.pdf
The answer lies in the fact that the high entropy of the
microwave background refers only to the matter content
of the universe and not to the gravitation field, as would
be encoded in its space-time geometry in accordance with
Einstein’s general relativity. What we find, in the early
universe, is an extraordinary uniformity, and this can be
interpreted as the gravitational degrees of freedom that are potentially available to the universe being not excited at all. As time progresses, the entropy rises as the initially
uniform distribution of matter begins to clump, as the
gravitational degrees of freedom begin to be taken up.
This allows stars to be formed, which become much
hotter than their surroundings (a thermal imbalance that
all life on Earth depends upon),
and finally this
gravitational clumping leads to the presence of black
holes (particularly the huge ones in galactic centres),
which represent an enormous increase in entropy.
Although, in general, there is no clear geometric
measure of the entropy in a gravitational field in general
relativity, we can at least provide proposals for the nonactivation
of gravitational degrees of freedom at the Big
Bang. I have referred to such a proposal as the Weyl
Curvature Hypothesis (WCH) [2]. In Einstein’s theory the
Ricci curvature Rab is directly determined by the
gravitational sources, via the energy-momentum tensor of
matter (analogue of the charge-current vector Ja in
Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory) and the remaining part
of the space-time Riemann curvature, namely the Weyl
curvature Cabcd, describes gravitational degrees of
freedom (analogue of the field tensor Fab of Maxwell’s
theory). WCH—which is a time-asymmetrical
hypothesis
With such
conformal invariance holding in the very early universe,
the universe has no way of “building a clock”. So it loses track of the scaling which determines the full space-time metric, while retaining its conformal geometry.
If we assume that in the
very remote future, conformally invariant equations again
govern the universe’s contents, then we can apply the
same mathematical trick as before, but now in the reverse
sense that we look for a boundary at which the conformal
factor Ω becomes zero, rather than infinite. This amounts
to using a metric, such as ĝab above, in which the future
infinity is “squashed down” to be a finite boundary to
space-time, which is conformally regular in the sense that
the space-time can be mathematically extended across this
future boundary as a smooth conformal manifold [5]. If
we also assume that there is a positive cosmological
constant present, as current observations appear to point
strongly towards, then we find that this future conformal
boundary is spacelike.
Physically, we
may think that again in the very remote future, the
universe “forgets” time in the sense that there is no way to
build a clock with just conformally invariant material.
This is related to the fact that massless particles, in
relativity theory, do not experience any passage of time.
We might even say that to a massless particle, “eternity is
no big deal”. So the future boundary, to such an entity is
just like anywhere else. With conformal invariance both
in the remote future and at the Big-Bang origin, we can
try to argue that the two situations are physically
identical, so the remote future of one phase of the
universe becomes the Big Bang of the next. This
suggestion is my “outrageous” conformal cyclic
cosmology” (CCC) [4].
the strength of gravity may be
considered as being infinitely large at the Big Bang
(which is, in a sense, why the gravitational degrees of
freedom must initially be set to zero), and this strength
gets smaller as time progresses, eventually reducing to
zero at the final boundary.
as it also involves an exponential
expansion, though this occurs before the Big Bang in
CCC, rather than afterwards.
https://www.newamerica.org/weekly/catalytic-potential-entropy/
Efficient communication reduces the probability space of all possible events, allowing us to act more quickly and effectively.Our goal is to find ordered sources of energy and resist the influence of entropy on our bodies. In communication, we minimize entropy by finding information and reducing uncertainty. We've invented technologies to help us with both—we use machines to expend energy and computers to communicate vast amounts of information. Maximizing the returns of technology requires an understanding of both the physical and digital domains—and of the powerful law that connects them.
No comments:
Post a Comment