The apparent power is therefore a linear
combination of a scalar (active power) and of a
bivector (reactive power) and it could be
(geometrically) interpreted as a spinor
Is it really the first time?
I referenced this SAME "wattless power" as noncommutative phase - pretty sure.
Let's see.
https://ecoechoinvasives.blogspot.com/2017/09/the-amazing-analysis-of-se-robbins-on.html
Steinmetz figures prominently - and it was Steinmetz who realized that Tesla had utilized noncommutative phase as the secret of "wattless power."
So I guess I published that LATEr.
Yeah he published in 2014.
J x 1 = J while 1 x J= -J
Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society
https://books.google.com/books?id=4qQ-AQAAIAAJ1901 - Mathematics... EI cos w, and the second the author calls the ' 'wattless power," or EI sin to. ... but is unattractive, except to those versed in non-commutative algebra, 1901.
Further, the scalar product is commutative, and has no definite line of action, while the vector product is non-commutative, and must be considered as acting along an axis perpendicular to the plane of the original vectors.
So actually it was mentioned WAY BACK when....
Vectors and Vector Diagrams applied to the Alternating ...
No comments:
Post a Comment