The I-thought is non-commutative imaginary primordial time as infinite iteration

  [p,q]=iℏ,

and we have arrived at Heisenberg’s fundamental relationship between position and momentum. This mode of arrival is predicated on the recognition that iΔt represents an interactive interval of time. In the notion of time, there is an inherent clock and an inherent shift of phase that enables a synchrony, a precise dynamic beneath the apparent dynamic of the observed process. Once this substitution is made, once the imaginary value is placed in the temporal circuit, the patterns of quantum mechanics appear. In this way, quantum mechanics can be seen to emerge from the discrete.

The latest from math professor Louis Kauffman and his colleague from Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (where Eddie Oshins realized the secret of Daoist neigong)

That format doesn't scroll easily - so there is also a pdf link

 By starting with a discrete time series of positions, one has immediately a non-commutativity of observations, since the measurement of velocity involves the tick of the clock and the measurement of position does not demand the tick of the clock.

What we have learned from science is that "attention" is right-brain dominant and "attention" is the source of the I-thought - it is silence awareness.

So the "primordial time" referred to in this article is actually non-commutative, non-dual, non-local, non-linear, non-western attention as formless awareness in silence.

 we see that, in this way, i becomes inextricably identified with elemental time, and so the physical substitution of it for t (Wick rotation) becomes, in this epistemology, an act of recognition of the nature of time. One does not have an increment of time all alone as in classical t. One has it, a combination of an interval and the elemental dynamic that is time.

So time is being reincorporated as an operator instead of an outside parameter.

 A simplest and fundamental instance of these ideas is seen in the structure of i=−1−−−√. We view i as an iterant [5,6,7,8,9,10,11], a discrete elementary dynamical system repeating in time the values {⋯,−1,+1,−1,+1,⋯}. One can think of this system as resulting from the attempt to solve i2=−1 in the form i=−1/i. Then, one iterates the transformation x⟶−1/x and finds the oscillation from a starting value of +1 or −1. In this sense, i is identical in concept to a primordial time. Furthermore, the algebraic structure of the complex numbers emerges from two conjugate views of this discrete series as [−1,+1] and [+1,−1]. We introduce a temporal shift operator η such that η[−1,+1]=[+1,−1]η and η2=1 (sufficient to this purpose). Then, we can define i=[−1,+1]η, endowing it with one view of the discrete oscillation and the sensitivity to shift the clock when interacting with itself or with another operator.

 And so from the basic non-commutative philosophy of primordial time then both quantum and general relativity are unified.

But from our perspective we also have an accurate explanation of non-western vichara or self-enquiry of the source of the I-thought as also being non-commutative, non-local, non-linear, non-dual natural resonance harmonics. (i.e. just as Alain Connes derived the same noncommutative unified field theory from music harmonics).

What the scientists do is replace the classical derivators with commutators to convert the non-commutative logic back into commutative logic.

In terms of meditation we are interested in acknowledging the scientific truth of the primoridial synchronization of time as inherent to reality - secretly guiding reality, what Louis de Broglie discovered as the Law of Phase Harmony.

I called this the secret of the "I-One-Eye." So that the "one" - as a time iterant is tied to the I-thought but also the opening of the third eye as non-commutative resonance. What Kauffman et. al. are doing is addressing the "measurement problem" of relativistic quantum physics as an inherent non-commutative logic problem! This moves it out of the lab - where Roger Penrose wants the "measurement problem" solved - and instead moves it into the existential realm of what is science - fundamentally - as a process of entropy based on math. The mathematicians are being honest.

More importantly they are admitting that what appears to be "random" or "chance" is actually due to this discrete measurement problem of science itself creating entropy! This is what I have been claiming all along - only I don't have the fancy math equations to back up my claim, nor am I promoting the commutative conversion to commutative math-science. haha. On the contrary - I'm pointing out how science has destroyed ecology by projecting this entropy onto the real world, as a psychological projection.

Eddie Oshins also figured out this secret with his Neigong connection of non-commutative logic. He was the only one to do so.

Dr. Grauer: Have you considered that the original music culture was based on non-commutative logic? (In contrast to how modern music is taught as based on commutative logarithmic math). Eddie Oshins realized that non-western "trance dance" training - (i.e. Daoist neigong) as martial arts was due also to non-commutative logic - that also explains quantum physics. He worked at SLAC (Stanford Linear Accelerator Center) but Oshins also taught Wingchun. So as you write in your book - the Daoist music harmonics of yin and yang are from the San Bushmen music harmonics. So in the San Bushmen culture for example the females sleep on the left hand of the fire and the males sleep on the right hand of the fire. That is an example of noncommutative logic. It's all complementary opposites. Math professor Alain Connes has a lecture on youtube about how music theory is actually non-commutative logic that also explains a unified field theory. I have the link if you're interested - and the quotes are on my blog - excerpted from Connes work. thanks, drew http://elixirfield.blogspot.com - Connes summarizes his theory as this (2, 3, infinity). Pretty simple! But people just don't understand the noncommutative phase aspect of it, since this was covered up at the foundation of Western symmetric math logic.

thanks,

drew