Superluminal Evanescent Ghost Group Weak Waves: 1/2 quanta or spin 1/2 ether-awareness

The experimental science is finally checking up with relativistic quantum models that started with de Broglie - the superluminal momentum. Max Born introduced "relativistic mass" in 1920 - and now it is a term rarely used. Someone points out that rather "relativistic momentum" is better accepted now. It is really a matter of whether a quantum or a relativistic "spin" or perspective it taken on the theory.

So what I corroborated today - by reviewing some of my previous links I posted - yes the light is inverse to the particle emitting the light. The particles spacetime shift is then the relativistic mass or relativistic momentum (phononic field) that creates the subharmonic beat of the light being emitted.

 Sweeping beams of light can cast spots moving with superluminal speeds across scattering surfaces. Such faster-than-light speeds are well-known phenomena that do not violate special relativity. It is shown here that under certain circumstances, superluminal spot pair creation and annihilation events can occur that provide unique information to observers. These spot pair events are {\it not} particle pair events -- they are the sudden creation or annihilation of a pair of relatively illuminated spots on a scattering surface. Real spot pair illumination events occur unambiguously on the scattering surface when spot speeds diverge, while virtual spot pair events are observer dependent and perceived only when real spot radial speeds cross the speed of light. Specifically, a virtual spot pair creation event will be observed when a real spot's speed toward the observer drops below c, while a virtual spot pair annihilation event will be observed when a real spot's radial speed away from the observer rises above c. https://www.space.com/28332-faster-than-light-illusion-cosmic-secrets.html

In other words in both relativity and quantum physics - the "observer" very much changes the results of the experiment.


So this physics (pdf)  has yet to even be acknowledged in the "popular science" (i.e. materialistic skeptics) crowd - keen on being rationalistic. When we consider in terms of physical matter - the absorption band - when we achieve "resonance" for that absorption band - then we can achieve this superluminal velocity as the ether-awareness. This is what Mahayana Buddhism means by different levels of consciousness having different levels of emptiness (and vice versa).

So when we realize then that the source of Charge as Yuan Qi energy is the 5th dimension as non-local Spin - we then also realize that time itself is "asymmetric" as Sir Roger Penrose points out. There is a spin to time based on the spin of whether we "turn the light around." The 1/2 spin of light is its relativistic mass (or relativistic momentum). As B.G. Sidharth points out - it is the noncommutative spacetime that gives light mass.



Superluminal signals in science? pdf

 OK so in terms of science - these experiments are still quite controversial. But it just goes to show that such phenomenon as precognition in meditation - such things now have an experimental validation. And as I have quoted Olivier Costa de Beauregard - the physicists realized the connection between precognition and the relativistic quantum results.

This paper investigates the problem of a relativistic Dirac half-integer spin free particle tunneling through a rectangular quantum-mechanical barrier. If the energy difference between the barrier and the particle is positive, and the barrier width is large enough, there is proof that the tunneling may be superluminal. For first spinor components of particle and antiparticle states, the tunneling is always superluminal regardless the barrier width. Conversely, the second spinor components of particle and antiparticle states may be either subluminal or superluminal depending on the barrier width. These results derive from studying the tunneling time in terms of phase time. For the first spinor components of particle and antiparticle states, it is always negative while for the second spinor components of particle and antiparticle states, it is always positive, whatever the height and width of the barrier. In total, the tunneling time always remains positive for particle states while it becomes negative for antiparticle ones. Furthermore, the phase time tends to zero, increasing the potential barrier both for particle and antiparticle states. This agrees with the interpretation of quantum tunneling that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle provides. This study’s results are innovative with respect to those available in the literature. Moreover, they show that the superluminal behaviour of particles occurs in those processes with high-energy confinement.

Superluminal Tunneling of a Relativistic Half-Integer Spin Particle Through a Potential Barrier

pdf link





So as this paper points out, for "science" time is a parameter, not an operator, DESPITE time being a "physical variable conjugated to the energy." (i.e. time-frequency uncertainty).

So by science defining time through geometric space - there is this awkward "measurement problem" when time suddenly is frozen. This is called using a "linear operator" but when we LISTEN to time then hearing is nonlinear.



OK so that paper is June 2018 - pretty recent! So to get a handle on what this science means - for me - I just take a wide-angle approach. I read as many different sources as possible since everyone explains things a little differently. Then I began piecing everything today. I don't waste my time doing calculations - as computers can do calculations much faster. I focus on learning the meaning and concepts involved. But the basic thing is to question everything and to not limit yourself. So I questioned even the Pythagorean Theorem in school - and I held onto that personal challenge. Not until the deepest science has emerged - I had to keep digging - and sure enough - the highest level of science has proved me correct. This stuff is the very opposite of "woo-woo." haha.