why coherent quantum phase information is the key to superluminal force in the EPR paradox of Bell's entangled experiment: C.S. Unnikrishnan

 

 

Is the Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Complete? Proposed Resolution of the EPR Puzzle

• February 2002
• Foundations of Physics Letters 15(1):1-25

DOI:10.1023/A:1015823125892

Authors:

C.s Unnikrishnan

• Defence Institute of Advanced Technology

 

 

 

 While this is considered local - I think the coherent phase is in the 5th dimension?

  He's against 

"local realism at the level of eigenvalues....this means that quantum systems have their objective reality at a level deeper than that described by the EPR definition of reality."

 

 Bernard d' Espagnat refutes the claim about phase by Unnikrishnan

But is d' Espagnat correct? 

 The physical origin of the phase change is universally a term
of the form R E dt, where E is the interaction energy. I show that the topological nature
of the phase comes from the gradient free nature of the interaction energy in the problem.
Since quantum phases and ‘polarization’ are closely related, these remarks are relevant in
the context of rotations of polarization or spin as well.

 https://tifr.academia.edu/Unnikrishnan

 Processes like decoherence diffuses the individual phase
and thus the relative phase, slowly washing out the fidelity of the conserva-
tion law (preserved however when the total system including the interacting
environment is considered) and hence the entanglement fidelity. With this
insight, it is much easier to understand the subtleties of quantum entangle-
ment. ...The crucial physical input to the
understanding of quantum correlations that respect strict Einstein
locality is that the local conservation laws are directly encoded in
the quantum phases [29], which correspond to the quantum action.

 

 a topological phase is nonlocal...The noncomutativity of space introduces
this dependence in the phase  https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0610222

 Rębilas, K. On the Unnikrishnan resolution of the EPR puzzle. Found Phys Lett 17, 277–286 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOPL.0000032477.55284.00  He argues that indeed Unnikrishnan's reliance on "relative phase" is actually nonlocal. Is the noncommutative phase-space considered nonlocal? yes. "This nonlocal picture is made equivalent by the Weyl map to a full noncommutative picture in the phase space formulation of the theory. The connection between the entanglement and nonlocality of the representation is explored and specific examples of the generation of entanglement by using the concept of generalized Bell states are provided."

 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.10928

 Towards Noncommutative Quantum Reality1
Otto C. W. Kong

 the simple move to fully embrace the quantum noncommutativity of Nature