Negative Math: How Mathematical Rules Can Be Positively Bent
https://www.martinezwritings.com/m/Kinematics.html
I was very impressed by Prof. Alberto Martinez book on the background of Einstein's relativity.
In that book he mentions working in Dinkytown by University of Minnesota at the Italian restaurant Mama Rosa's. I think he was the dishwasher - I can't remember and there is no way to read or search the book - maybe through Amazon? Nope.
Anyway I had read that book through Interlibrary loan - it's very cool.
So I was just reading the googlebook preview about the Replacements - and Bob Stinson also worked at Mama Rosa's as a dishwasher - and he was forced to quit until he reformed himself and got his job back...
The amazon book description of "Negative math" makes no mention of noncommutativity! But Martinez' website does.
In my book Negative Math
(Princeton University Press, 2005), I analyzed the history of negative
numbers and I formulated a coherent algebra in which minus times minus
is minus. In this new algebra, multiplication of numbers with different
signs is non-commutative, which introduces symmetries that are missing
in traditional numerical algebra.
amazon review excerpts:
A
very accessible (relatively speaking) way to understand, question and
contextualize the most important idea in Math: why is -2 -2 = 4 and
not -4 ?
And once you read the book, you realize you can go both ways (with pros and cons).
fascinating!
an arbitrary decision that makes some operations easier and some way more confusing (the need for i, other asymmetries, etc)..
The author's project in this book is to motivate then introduce an
alternative, non-commutative arithmetic which he feels may have use in
some mathematical descriptions of the physical world. He does not,
however, present this in a mathematically sophisticated way - for
example, there is no mention of groups, rings, or fields, and there is
no appendix containing a concise presentation of his ideas.
The
book is written as a popularization and it remains at that level
throughout. His attempt to motivate his alternative arithmetic involves
trying to create cognitive dissonance in the reader: to convince the
reader there is something unsatisfactory with the way we calculate with
negative and imaginary numbers. He does this by obdurately insisting
upon questionable physical interpretations of arithmetical equations,
then complaining about their obscurity and pointing at the mathematics
as the culprit behind the confusion.
.
It not only explains WHY a minus times a minus is a plus, but also
reveals that (essentially) the same reason is responsible for imaginary
numbers and also vector algebra and its seemingly archaic rules. It
opens the doors to a very deep understanding of mathematics.
Martinez
then shows why mathematicians had troubles with negatives by
demonstrating what happens if a negative times a negative _isn't_
positive. This _REALLY_ helped me because I learn best when I can see
the "wrong" way of doing something and what kind of results it produces.
It showed that you can have two systems that are different but equally
valid. It also helped reveal why vector algebra is the way it is; it
is essentially a "wrong" way of doing regular algebra but that,
critically, works.
No comments:
Post a Comment