Wednesday, August 28, 2024

Oxford Physics Prof. Raymond Pierrehumbert informs of his article on the Global Warming Nobel Prize 2021

 Fluid Mechanics: the quintessential complex system

Abstract:
The 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics recognizes advances in the understanding of complex systems, and underscores that ‘complex’ does not mean ‘imponderable’.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

 https://web.archive.org/web/20220805105643id_/https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/313B5D56A3BF8D4776D398A638A23C72/S0022112022000714a.pdf/div-class-title-fluid-mechanics-the-quintessential-complex-system-div.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

I appreciate you sharing your views openly. Yes I agree and I'm glad that you have pointed out that indeed modern science is based on Freemasonry - as my 2012 book also argues. Raymond Pierrehumbert did an interview with the NY Times - posted on youtube - where he calls global warming the "final exam" for humanity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-oVDW5QYbI
And yes Joseph Fourier was limited by what science calls Fourier Uncertainty - meaning that time is defined as a linear operator so it inherently "takes" time to convert time to frequency and vice versa. This also means that time is defined as a symmetric geometry but in noncommutativity time is not defined as a symmetric geometry. Rather time is defined as inverse frequency and relying on the secret of listening in quantum biology (that my 2012 book reveals - citing the tinnitus research on ultrasound) - actually my later research builds on this - but essentially that is the secret truth of meditation to bypass that time-frequency uncertainty).
Nevertheless - just as we rely on modern science now to communicate via the internet or cell phones - we define reality as per modern science. So Noam Chomsky, for example, points out how ever since Newton there has been this disconnect - since gravity is an "action at a distance" that Newton could only explain mathematically. So mathematically there is an inherent disconnect between the one to one correspondence of number and geometry - this is the Godel's Incompleteness Theorem that Roger Penrose emphasizes is the reason that "calculations" are not "consciousness" as defined by quantum nonlocal protoconsciousness.
So anyway when Pierrehumbert says that no believing in global warming is the equivalent of being a flat-earther - similarly people equate global warming with being as well-proven as gravity. But we also know that in deep meditation it is possible to achieve antigravity as Professor Michael Grosso's book "The Man Who Could Fly" demonstrates well - the analysis of Saint Joseph de Copertino. My own teacher, Chunyi Lin, did also levitate up nine feet after he meditated 28 days nonstop in a cave in full lotus at Mt. Qingcheng in 1995.
So yes in a fundamental sense it is possible to question abrupt global warming but in the context of modern science, tragically, we now have some 310 million people today needing food assistance as per the U.N. report for this year - with some 30 million people starving, mainly around the Sudan area. The conflicts are intensifying due to the increase in extreme weather - be it flooding or droughts. But in fact if someone is bold enough to consider the ecological crisis in greater detail we realize the abrupt global warming is actually much worse than even Raymond Pierrehumbert admits to. http://arctic-news.blogspot.com is an excellent site that goes into this but also https://guymcpherson.com/ the work of conservation biologist professor emeritus Guy McPherson.
thanks,
drew

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment