Tuesday, November 21, 2023

Proof that Raymond Chiao's definition of spin-coupling wrongly excludes noncommutative time-frequency: Guenter Nimtz!

 

Proof that Raymond Chiao spin-coupling is excluding the truth of noncommutative time-frequency as per Guenter Nimtz superluminal sound signal experiments!
thanks,
drew

Date: Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: Please comment on Raymond Chiao's superluminal signal paper
To: Günter Nimtz <g.nimtz@uni-koeln.de>

Wow - thanks very much Professor Nimtz! I will study that book chapter. I have your book also. Your mention of Wick rotation spiked my interest for sure and your mention of "strange models" by Chiao is spot-on. It's all very tedious to have to sort all these claims out. hahaha. He is close but not quite there yet!

On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 10:50 AM Günter Nimtz <g.nimtz@uni-koeln.de> wrote:

-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: Please comment on Raymond Chiao's superluminal signal paper
Datum: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 13:47:50 +0200
Von: Günter Nimtz <g.nimtz@uni-koeln.de>
An: Günter Nimtz <g.nimtz@uni-koeln.de>

Hello Drew Hempel:

We are used to this behaviour of Chiao and Steinberg: not to cite our papers. Here, you shall find all the explained superluminal effects.

Sincerely,  Günter Nimtz


Am 05.08.2023 um 22:14 schrieb Voidisyinyang Voidisyinyang:
Hi Professor Emeritus Gunter Nimtz: Professor Raymond Chiao seems to be challenging your claim but doesn't cite you! https://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.2402.pdf I will check this for citations in googlescholar first. Yes it doesn't get cited much nor does he cite your work directly. I agree with your claims by the way. I also have experimented with this concept via quantum biology meditation training. Please comment and criticize Chiao for me since his analysis is very fascinating. I favor noncommutative phase as quantum algebra for the nonlocal foundation of reality.
thanks, 
drew hempel
re: Raymond Chiao's paper:
Superluminal phase and group velocities: A
tutorial on Sommerfeld’s phase, group, and front
velocities for wave motion in a medium, with
applications to the “instantaneous
superluminality” of electrons
 
 a superluminal signal velocity violates the relativistic causality, often called Einstein
causality: no signal can propagate with a velocity greater than c. ...The tunneling time is of the order of the reciprocal frequency of the wave
packet [13,15]. This time is spent at the entrance boundary as will be shown in
Sect. 6. From an experimental point of view the transit time for a wave packet
propagating through a barrier is measured as the interval between the arrivals
of the signal envelope at the two ends of that region.

An example of evanescent digital signals transmitted with microwaves is dis-
played in Fig. 1. The half width (the time duration at half the maximum inten-
sity) represents the number of digits....

 Here k0 is the wave number and λ0 the wavelength of waves in vacuum which
are related k0 = 2π/λ0. Furthermore, n(ω) = n′(ω) − in′′(ω) is the refractive
index n we are familiar with from Snellius’ law. The quantities n′ and n′′ real
and imaginary parts of the refractive index of the medium in question. Both
quantities, k and n are in general complex functions of frequency.

 citing https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-34523-x_19

sent to me via email!

  the square number of the imaginary refractive index
n′′2 corresponds to a negative effective potential E − U in the Schr¨odinger equa-
tion.

  virtual photons
are those modes which do not satisfy the Einstein relation W 2  = (ℏk)2c2.

 In all superluminal experiments,
the signal length is long compared with the measured negative time shift.

 these superluminal
pulses contain only evanescent frequency components.

 

 Several tunneling experiments have revealed superluminal signal velocity in
tunneling photonic barriers [5]

  A shorter signal with the same
information content would have an equivalently broader frequency bandwidth,
compare (55)

  The tunneling time is short and arises at the
barrier front as scattering time. This time equals approximately the recipro-
cal frequency of the carrier frequency or of the wave packet energy divided by
the Planck constant h [13, 15]. Inside a barrier the wave packet does spent zero
time [5, 30]. This property results in superluminal signal and energy velocities,
as a signal is detected by its energy, i.e. by photons or other field quanta like
phonons. The detector receives the tunneled signal earlier than the signal, which
traveled the same distance in vacuum as demonstrated in Figs. 1, 9, 12. Evanes-
cent fields like tunneling particles are not observable [22, 23, 25, 42–44].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

No comments:

Post a Comment