My replies to Dr. David Chester on noncommutativity

Hi Dr. David Chester: Thanks for your response. As you know, Noncommutativity is not limited to the quantum scale. As Pascual Jordan realized, noncommutativity self-amplifes to the macroscale. Professor Basil J. Hiley is focused on the Jordan Product (usually called the Baker Bracket) as being neglected in standard quantum physics. I have been corresponding with Professor Basil J. Hiley several times. He considers noncommutativity to be the truth of quantum gravity. Hiley is a very different approach than quantum field theory. Hiley is critical of both Dirac and Feynman. I just got a response from Professor Robert Flack, about a week ago, stating that he is going ahead with the weak measurement experiment using argon, testing Hiley's noncommutativity. Their lab was shutdown for the pandemic. The weak measurement research group of Yakir Aharonov explicitly notes these weak measurement experiments demonstrate "gravitational repulsion."

I'm glad to hear you've worked with Professor Lou Kauffman. I also corresponded with him several times. He worked on noncommutativity out of his discrete physics model with Pierre Noyes at SLAC. Kauffman also collaborated with Eddie Oshins at SLAC on noncommutativity with Oshins teaching Stanford Wing Chun as an example of noncommutativity. Kauffman admits that noncommutative "primordial time" is "almost mystical."

I trained in a similar type of "neigong" - just as Eddie Oshins realized the secret of "internal martial arts" energy (and nonwestern meditation energy in general) is from noncommutativity that he called the "self-referential motion" of "quantum psychology." I can assure you that Eddie Oshins is correct - just as Hiley emphasizes - there is a "new quality of energy" discovered on the macroscale via noncommutativity body-mind-spirit training as neigong. I have experienced a spacetime vortex being created out of nonwestern meditation qigong training that I did with http://springforestqigoing.com to finish my master's degree at University of Minnesota - I did intensive meditation in 2000. My own teacher, Chunyi Lin, actually did levitate up nine feet while in full lotus meditation, soon after finishing his 28 day nonstop full lotus meditation (no sleep the whole time!) in a cave at Mt. Qingcheng, China in 1995. For the best documented case of antigravity levitation see Professor Michael Grosso's books on Saint Joseph de Copertino.

Alain Connes emphasizes that all of standard physics has been based on commutative geometry with the technology trying to reduce the entropy of matter. Hence our ecological crisis today - due to not understanding noncommutativity. Connes also emphasizes that Jungian synchronicities are due to noncommutativity as nonlocality. I have studied the ecological crisis in depth - I even got arrested eight times protesting against its causes. haha.

I discovered noncommutativity from my music research since as math professor Luigi Borzacchini points out, standard western science is based on a "deep pre-established disharmony" as the "guiding evoltive principle" of science from using the wrong music theory as the secret origin of Platonic commutative geometry mathematics. Alain Connes is the only scientist providing the truth of music theory as also the truth of noncommutativity frrom an infinity of infinite dimensions as a factorization process he calls, "two, three, infinity" - from which linear time orginates. See Alain Connes lecture on youtube, "Music of Shapes." (several versions).

Math Professor Michio Durdevich cites Connes to explain the truth of Pythagorean philosophy is actually noncommutativity (not the Platonic b.s. that people claim is Pythagorean but is actually from Archytas and Philolaus). So you can see we've been brainwashed eversince Platonic philosophy set up the "Beauty is Truth: A History of Symmetry" lie (book title by math professor Ian Stewart).

Penrose emphasizes that gravitational entropy is the opposite of the entropy of matter and that gravitational mass originates from noncommutative time-frequency out of the de Broglie-Einstein Relation in Penrose's "palatial twistor" model. Penrose explains, as per Schroedinger, that life is from the gravitational potential as quantum negentropy and that time is "fundamental time" (term from Lee Smolin who had the same quantum mechanics prof that I had) that is asymmetric time and nonlocal protoconsciousness. Keep in mind that Penrose's quantum biology research with Stuart Hameroff emphasizes that Einstein's weak equivalence principle is debunked by quantum noncommutative nonlocality. Jean Bricmont makes this same point and Bricmont emphasizes that even Stephen Hawking didn't understand the truth of the Bell Inequality experiments.

Hiley includes Penrose's Palatial Twistor model in Hiley's noncommutativity, as he mentioned in his recent talk. https://emmy.network/mindandmatter.html

This vid is unlisted on youtube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl5RrZ4LEGg&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Femmy.network%2F&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo

I would not consider noncommutativity to be simply an extension of the real number spacetime continuum as you claimed in your first sentence to me (I realize that is the typical biased definition of noncommutativity in terms of Riemannian geometry) - on the contrary, Alain Connes emphasizes that noncommutativity is discrete and more dense than the real number continuum and is therefore fundamentally different than the real number continuum.

As Connes explains to physicists (see the youtube link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODAngTW8deg ), this is the secret negentropic origin of spacetime. Kauffman also emphasizes that the secret of the imaginary number is from a discrete iteration as "fundamental time" with an inherent asymmetric time shift inherent to each extermal measurement, so that reality inherently has a Minkowski spacetime to it. Kauffman also explains this is the secret asymmetric discrete time shift origin of supposedly "random" Brownian motion! (the same point as Connes). In fact in a recent Quicycle talk, Kauffman derives all of physics from noncommutativity.

https://www.academia.edu/100112972/Noncommutativity_alone_gives_rise_to_Physics_really_deep_stuff

That link gives some of the email replies I received from Kauffman and Hiley.

John G. Williamson attended the Kauffman talks and I have corresponded with Williamson also - with Williamson emphasizing that de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony is noncommutativity.

Have you studied Professor Jean Bricmont's emphasis that the de Broglie-Bohm model debunks quantum field theory via the Bell's Inequality experiments? I took quantum mechanics from Professor Herbert J. Bernstein (who was Lee Smolin's first quantum mechanics professor) who emphasizes that everyone should take quantum mechanics as their first physics course, otherwise people learn the wrong foundation of reality. Bernstein used the noncommutative torus for his superdense quantum teleportation satellite signal system being tested by NASA.

I have also corresponded with Nobel Physicist Brian Josephson on these issues (several times over the past five years or so) since Josephson now agrees that quantum biology is more primary to reality than classical physics - meaning there is a secret to the process of attention that Jack Sarfatti is overlooking. haha. Josephson explained to me that Jack doesn't understand this secret of attention - just as Jack pointed out he had been "debating" with Brian about these issues. Brian Josephson also now practices qigong at Cambridge.

Thanks for your feedback.

drew hempel

 

Hi David: Thanks for the response. You wrote: 

The commutator [A,B] = AB - BA, which is zero when A and B commute. Commutative structures have vanishing commutators. This is just a mathematical statement.

OK but this is what I want you to consider.Email to me from Basil J. Hiley:

“The Jordan product is the most neglected product in
the whole discussion of the foundations of quantum
mechanics.”

 

"But what if Newton’s first law is not valid at the quantum level?

Assume at this level these two expressions are not in fact equal, then
non-commutativity will be the consequence.... Since the [star]-
product can also be written as the exponentiation of the Poisson
bracket then classical mechanics must contain some trace of this
non-locality, suggesting that classical mechanics itself has some

features that we have missed simply by using Newton’s or even
Hamilton’s differential equations of motion."
Hiley, B. & Pylkkanen, Paavo. (2022). Can Quantum Mechanics Solve

the Hard Problem of Consciousness

"Bohm (and also de Broglie (1960)) called this term the “quantum
potential energy.” This new quality of energy enters as the
coefficient of h[squared] [relativistic from de Broglie] and this is why Dirac
missed the QHJ equation. Its appearance is intimately connected
with the Baker bracket (Jordan product) and therefore the non-
commutativity of (x✭ p)."

https://royalsoc.org.au/images/pdf/journal/154-2-Hiley.pdf

The Moyal-Dirac controversy revisited
B. J. Hiley

"This in turn implies that a non-commutative phase space can be
regarded as lying at the heart of quantum theory."...

"Thus the ✭-product is non-local in that it involves integrating over a non-local
region in the non-commutative phase space. It is this product that is used in M-
theory."...

I"n an analysis that focusses on the non-local nature of the ✭-product, Hiley (2015)
shows that the ( p, x) should be identified with the mean position of a “blob” in phase
space (de Gosson 2013)."

"On the other hand if the expansion of the Baker
bracket is limited to O(h) then it reduces to the usual commutative product. It was for
this reason that Dirac (1947) missed the appearance of the quantum potential energy.
Whereas it appears in the appendix of Moyal’s classic (1949) paper, as we will show in

section 5.1."

"To repeat, it is only when we go to order O(h2) and above that the Baker bracket
does not reduce to the usual commutative product. Generally terms of O(h2) are
assumed to be negligible and therefore are not discussed, but the bracket plays an
important role when energy (Hiley 2015) is involved."

 

Hi David: As you know I'm not a physicist but Basil Hiley has emphasized that most physicists are not truly dealing with nonlocality. 

Hiley is explaining that there is no escape from the environmental context being part of the "experiment" and the claim of an objective measurement otherwise has been the cause of our current ecological crisis. So I dare say it is easy for physicists to underestimate the implications of Hiley's physics worldview. Hiley is keen to emphasize that Bohmian "mechanics" is not correct - that David Bohm did not like the word "mechanics" and also that Hamiltonian Mechanics is incomplete at best.

What both Hiley and Connes rely on and emphasize is the original noncommutativity of the "transition frequencies" that Heisenberg studied in the Ritz-Rydberg combination principle. So I think to try to just claim one can just study Heisenberg's algebra and uncertainty principle is not true or accurate to the emphasis on spectral frequency that Alain Connes explains in his talk (on youtube), "Music of Shapes."

So Hiley told me he has not focused on gravitational entropy. You are discussing "entanglement entropy" in your research but Hiley is emphasizing that nonlocality is not a byproduct of creating entanglement. Nonlocality exists inherently via the noncommutativity process that as I said Penrose calls "fundamental time" but Connes calls it "primitive time" and Lou Kauffman calls it "primordial time."

The emphasis by Hiley on Planck's Constant squared and the quantum potential via noncommutativity as a process means there is no point particle and also no zero symmetric rest frame at measurement. Instead the noncommutative algebra deals with the "subobservables" in the weak measurements. Hiley told me that at zero spacetime there already is the future and past overlapping.

The frequencies are inherently discrete and as Hiley emphasizes there is no need for the collapse of the wavefunction. With proper practice the "negative frequencies" from a time-reversed signal can be stored in the body internally as increased photon energy. This is because listening to music is proven to be up to ten times faster than Fourier Uncertainty. The highest sound we listen to externally resonates the brain internally as ultrasound. You are probably already aware of Anirban Bandyopadhyay documenting ultrasound resonating the microtubules and tubulin as a quantum coherence superradiance - with 3000 times greater conductance than any other frequency.

This negative frequency nonlocal secret has already been demonstrated with the "dynamical Casimir Effect" and more recently with Sir John Pendry's research group doing the Archimedes Screw circulation of light experiment. I discussed with a quantum field theorist who insisted that it was impossible for a virtual photon to exist for real - that they are only a "mathematical entity" - (this is the view of PBS Spacetime for example) - well as you admit Dirac has problems and Basil J. Hiley details how Feynman messed up also. Did you see Hiley's informal talk that goes into Feynman error more?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl00BY8kopw

The Weak measurements experiments, based on noncommutativity, explicity demonstrate "gravitational repulsion" from a "nega-particle" or negative mass. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.09510

In particular, this implies the possibility of gravitational repulsion rather than attraction within the weak reality.

That study is cited with more discussion elsewhere. So I really see no need to rely on any switch to classical physics that inherently goes against the negentropy of quantum biology.

 https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article/75/7/30/2848581/Thermodynamics-of-the-climate-systemTo-understand

We have already over 250 Zettajoules of extra heat accumulated into the oceans since 1995 and the Aerosol Masking Effect, as per Daniel Rosenfeld's research group, shows a 40% decrease of burning coal also heats up Earth another 1 degree Celsius global average. The current CO2 emissions are 100 times faster than any previous time in the past 500 million years.

Clearly classical physics has greatly increased the entropy of life against the gravitational potential originated from quantum negentropy as Roger Penrose explains. There is also a 1200 gigaton pressurized methane reservoir in the East Siberian Arctic Shelf - the world's largest ocean shelf - that is already accelerating its emissions with a "very likely... abrupt eruption" soon - just a 5 gigaton abrupt eruption will double global warming. So clearly Mother Nature has serious plans for the future of "classical physics" as applied technology on Earth. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2019672118

methane is released from a large pool of preformed methane, as opposed to methane from slow decomposition of thawing subsea permafrost organic matter, suggests that these releases may be more eruptive in nature, which provides a larger potential for abrupt future releases.

Keep in mind this is not even discussed in the IPCC ar6 recent report of some 6000 plus pages!

I don't think just trying to expanding upon some classical field theory is going to fix the ecological crisis problem, and I think the wrong "commutative geometry" mathematics created a structural "deep pre-established disharmony" as the "guiding evoltive principle" of science to quote math Professor Luigi  Borzacchini again. Too bad his book, "Plato's Computer" was not translated out of Italian. haha.

If you listen to that 2015 talk that Connes gave to physicists (on the origin of quantum randomness) he relies on the same "Music of shapes" analysis from Milnor (Can you hear the shape of a drum? No..) - that there are "three kinds" of notes in music - and the two note chords are noncommutative. This is what Connes calls, "Two, Three and Infinity" as the simplest example and explanation of the infinity of infinite degrees of freedom as noncommutative factorization. Connes emphasizes in that 2015 talk - the link I already gave you - that this is a simple intuitive notion - yet it is very radical. It's a simple music notion that I realized from my training in music as a teenager.

There is an "overall motion" that we can't escape as Connes explains! The original time is not the linear time of primitive causality in relativity. This is Jean Bricmont's key emphasis also - that even Stephen Hawking did not understand Bell's Inequality since Bell's Inequality disproves primitive causality of linear time! Bricmont challenges physicists to find a quantum field theory textbook that discusses Bell' Inequality in this context. I have corresponded with Jean Bricmont about this also, of course he dismisses the paranormal and spirituality implications but he also does not discuss noncommutativity.

This is the secret of nonwestern meditation as quantum biology as well - from nonwestern music tuning practiced as a mind-body transformation of noncommutativity as Eddie Oshins, working at SLAC with Lou Kauffman, realized. So for example with the "Dirac Dance" that I was taught in my first year quantum physics course - the outside of the hand is yang that goes against the yin lower body while the inside of the hand is yin that goes against the upper yang body - as this "Dirac Dance" is practiced (called the Silk Reeling motion in Tai Chi). That is just one example of that concept as the secret of the training - it goes into all the energy channels of the body for a full body-mind-spirit transformation via the nonlocal, noncommutative protoconsciousness.

So we already have an explanation for antigravity levitation as realized and documented in the case of Saint Joseph de Copertino - see also the most famous Buddhist meditation master of Thailand, the free biography of Phra Acharn Mun discusses levitation as well. As I said, my own teacher achieved levitation - all that is needed is this simple intuitive yet radical understanding of philosophy that is practiced as meditation!

thanks for your conversation,

drew hempel