Wednesday, October 5, 2022

Stephen E. Robbin's Bergson critique of the geometric continuum as spacetime: The answer is noncommutativity

 Bergson's Holographic Theory - 3r - Time, Subject and Object

 Voidisyinyang Voidisyinyang

This is why I secretly rejected the Pythagorean Theorem in 10th grade math. haha. Math Professor Louis Kauffman just published a NOncommutative Pythagorean Theorem tied to the Dirac "dance." Professor Jean Bricmont points out that even Stephen Hawking doesn't understand Bell's Inequality!! Yes Bricmont debunks Quantum Field Theory that relies on relativity. Even Roger Penrose now admits that quantum field theory ignores the Bell's Inequality as inherent nonlocality.
So noncommutativity explains that each zero point of spacetime already has the future and past overlapping. And also each distance between to points is not a geometric distance but rather a nonlocal noncommutative spectral or frequency time difference.
All matter is actually made of light as Gerard 't Hooft's article, "Light is Heavy" explains
That's fascinating that Bergson relied on melody since Alain Connes' lecture, "Music of Shapes" (that he's done several times on youtube) proves that music is in fact noncommutative and thus an interpentrating whole. This is the same secret of music that I figured out when I was only 16 years old taking adult music theory class! thanks
Bertrand Russell stated "irrational numbers are a convenient fiction."
Connes emphasis is that noncommutative numbers are MORE DENSE than the geometric symmetric continuum.
This is what Fields Medal math professor Alain Connes is stating also - that the brain is an "inverse Fourier transform" on spacetime itself (not as a mathematical calculation or algorithm). The future and past is overlapping via the noncommutative process. Professor Basil J. Hiley is working on a new published article based on Alain Connes' lecture to physicists.... 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment