https://www.science.org/content/article/presto-light-creates-matter
When the laser photons collided head-on with the electrons, they got a huge energy boost, much like ping-pong balls hitting a speeding Mack truck, changing them from visible light to very high-energy gamma rays. These high-energy photons then rebounded into the path of incoming laser photons, interacting with them to produce positron-electron pairs.
http://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/examples/mcdonald_210917.pdf
So this is what happens during meditation - the Shen as laser light is turned back around into the Yang Qi and Yin Qi (positive and negative ions)....thereby increasing the momentum of the light as a step up in frequency.
The key point is Hawking's equation is that H-bar is used against the surface area when in fact Planck's Constant as the "average energy of light" is noncommutative such that the black hole is actually a 5D Klein Bottle in noncommutative time-frequency energy.
So instead of assuming space exists with an acceleration of light rather light exists as pure time and frequency in a primordial noncommutative time-frequency nonlocality.
This is what creates new matter.
This is a review of new developments in entropic gravity in light of the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation (RTI). A transactional approach to spacetime events can give rise in a natural way to entropic gravity (in the way originally proposed by Eric Verlinde) while also overcoming extant objections to that research program. The theory also naturally gives rise to a Cosmological Constant and to Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) and thus provides a physical explanation for the phenomena historically attributed to "dark energy" and "dark matter".
Gravity from Transactions: A Review of Recent Developments
| 3:10 PM (19 minutes ago) | ||
| |||
Thanks. Basically RTI agrees with this in the sense that metrical time
(the 'time' of 'spacetime') is generated by transactions, which
always involve the 'choice' of a particular observable, so that there
is a commutative space for the emission and absorption events. But
this is physically real--it really happens-- it's not a matter of our
ignorance. Metrical time is really physically generated. So when we
perceive the passage of time in this way, it's not illusory. It's
veridical. Only the measure of 'how much time has passed' is relative
to our inertial frame--our internal clock at the quantum level, which
is also physically real and based on the intrinsic periodicity of
fermionic spin. The latter however is not a spacetime process. See
Chapter 8 of my 2nd edition, excerpted material here:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11245
No comments:
Post a Comment