Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Someone tries to dismiss and attack me for my debunking of Philip Moriarity's wrong use of music theory to explain quantum physics: Physics Professor Dean Rickles rescues me!

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cevGdtPyuk&lc=UgzwQK93OnATvcT_EHB4AaABAg.8nEwF2a5C1C9cFNHRDTsna

 Artem Borisovskiy

Just wanted to thank Brady and Philip for their work on Sixty Symbols, which is one of my favourite channels on Youtube. It's always a pleasure to hear you guys chatting about science and whatnot. And special thanks goes to Philip for mentioning Rush and wearing Rush T-shirts a few times, because now I'm a fan of them too.
6
It's fun stuff but Moriarty doesn't understand noncommutative time-frequency. See Fields Medal math professor Alain Connes for his talk on music theory and "music of shapes" - he explains the truth of quantum physics from music theory. I also uploaded a debunking video of Philip Moriarty as well. thanks

Highlighted reply
 @Aki San  Oh your reply is hilarious because just yesterday I got a reply from a physics professor in Sydney Australia. I will post his reply here. He read my book and he corroborates my claim. Dean Rickles Mon, Jun 13, 7:03 AM (23 hours ago) to me Manfred Euler it is - hell of a name to live up to... On 13 Jun 2022, 9:44 PM +1000, Voidisyinyang Voidisyinyang wrote: > Oh thanks Professor Rickles! Actually here is the Manfred Euler that I refer to (link deleted due to youtube censorship) I corresponded with him a few times as we are doing. I greatly appreciate your feedback - fascinating about Feynman although Hiley is keen to emphasize that Feynman was wrong about how no one can understand quantum physics. haha. Have you listened to Hiley's latest talk? He has a new paper out now also that even mentions the Dirac Dance!! So maybe I had some feedback on his writing! haha. Oh yes I just read a Hiley paper from 2000 that discusses Hamilton re: time - very fascinating - so I uploaded a vid about it while also going into the secret of Blues music a bit more. I always cram links, etc. into the vid descriptions on my channel. hahaha. > I gotta run right now to clean up our place before the real cleaner arrives. haha. > thanks again, > drew >
 
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:50 AM Dean Rickles wrote: > > Hi Drew, > > I enjoyed this book - it’s weird how closely it overlaps with several [almost all in fact] current interests and ideas of mine. We seem to be on the same page in terms of the global situation and its deeper relation to metaphysical/occult principles. Likewise the suppression of knowledge related to non-dual ideas. I just placed an order for the Cosmic Humanism book you discussed early on, which I wasn't aware of. Wells, Ruskin, Puharich, Astor, I have been recently reading. Again, such odd mixture that I’m very curious about you and why you decided to write to me. Your book is like an AI has read my interests and constructed a book from it. Though I am not yet doing qigong - I only have some books on the subject. > > This was a nice line: > > “what we think of as childish trance dancing is actually the most sophisticated relativistic quantum unified field alchemy transmutation of matter and mind resonating in harmony with the mind of the Earth, Moon and Sun." > > I had a version of this while juggling [with the juggling pattern rather than dance as such providing the beat frequency] one time on mushrooms. > > I liked the Josephson remark on p. 364 too. He does not mention Heka in Egyptian magic, which is precisely what gives substance to thought through sound: the magic reside s in the word [which is where our notion of “spell” comes from]. > > By the way - on Feynman: he got interested in aspects of Mexico in his later years, in the Mayan codexes and so on, and then still later into Tannu Tuva. He also did some work on psychedelics and altered states - ketamine and sleep states. I think he had a kind of return to basics [all can be found in Surely You’re Joking Mr Feynman]. > > I found it interesting to see Hiley saying that we experience the implicate order through music - that was exactly what I was trying to get across in my Tucson conference talk. > > I also note that William Rowan Hamilton thought of algebra as the science of time, as does Connes: > > Best > Dean > > On 26 May 2022, 12:07 AM +1000, Voidisyinyang Voidisyinyang , wrote: > > Hi Professor Rickles: Here is the pdf you asked for. I forgot I had it on the computer still. haha. I recommend in your case to read the book backwards - starting with Basil J. Hiley's long email reply to me as the addendum. Then the final book chapter that is "quote heavy" as you mention in your talk - it relies on analyzing Alain Connes noncommutativity music theory philosophy of science. This book covers 20 years of published articles on the internet. The first chapter I call the noncommutative concept "complementary opposites" as I was explaining the concept without knowing the science term yet. > Thanks again, > drew > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 1:43 AM Dean Rickles wrote: > > Hi - I have not studied this. Do you have a pdf of the Preface/contents of your book? > Best > Dean > On 25 May 2022, 2:16 PM +1000, Voidisyinyang Voidisyinyang, wrote: > > Harold Atmanspacher said his talk was dry but he's really talking about noncommutativity. Have you studied Fields Medal Math Professor Alain Connes music analysis as noncommutativity? I have a new book on this - with a long reply from Basil J. Hiley as well. My book is called "Music as Meditation" and it's on noncommutativity as consciousness.
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment