Wednesday, June 8, 2022

Professor Basil J. Hiley's new relativistic quantum noncommutative paper and my respone to Michael Perrone

  I always enjoy getting feedback comments from you. If we are serious about antigravity then I have to agree with Roger Penrose that protoconsciousness is what solves the disconnect or logical paradox between gravity and the quantum measurement problem. More specifically Penrose's new "Palatial Twistor" analysis relies on noncommutativity as the foundation of reality based on what Penrose suggested to Stuart Hameroff as the lead clue to investigate: "Negative resonance" aka quantum beats. 

So the very definition of frequency has to be changed, as explained by Fields Medal Alain Connes, the mathematical physicist that Penrose relies on. Penrose admits he's not very good at noncommutative math but the colleague of Penrose, Professor Basil J. Hiley is good at noncommutative math. Hiley even recommended the "Twistor" term to Penrose. 

So this brings us to the recent Penrose debate with Gerard 't Hooft - both of them being Nobel Physicists and both focus on black hole research. This was a livestream discussion and the young moderator shut down their debate! Tragic. Essentially Penrose was claiming 't Hooft doesn't understand quantum black holes. The argument of 't Hooft is that there is a microblack hole that is both quantum and eternal. The problem is Gerard 't Hooft is not utilizing noncommutativity. 

So what's fascinating is that Professor Shahn Majid points out in noncommutativity the quantum nonlocal force from the future, as negative resonance, will cancel out the gravitational singularity of the black hole. So what remains is Penrose's protoconsciousness. Therefore the proper frequency is actually a quantum beat as a negative frequency from the future. 

The paper by Gerard 't Hooft and Martin van der Mark called "Light is Heavy" is correct to emphasize that all matter is actually made of light yet light itself is powered by the 1/2 spin of an eternal time-frequency motion due to the supermomentum of light as its relativistic mass. In fact that 1/2 spin is defined by noncommutativity as Alain Connes emphasizes from the discovery of Heisenberg. 

 So Connes argues that since noncommutativity is unobservable therefore matter appears to originate from randomness inherently yet in fact the entropy of matter originates from the inner cross products of the noncommutative matrices math as a quantum algebraic process of time-frequency in the 5th dimension. Ironically we can solve this problem through quantum biology as Roger Penrose recently emphasized in his later "Science of Consciousness" talk and discussion (recently uploaded to youtube). 

 So as JohnJoe McFadden, one of the founders of quantum biology points out, the reason there can be macroquantum coherence in biology at room temperature - aka superconductivity of the protons and electrons is due to quantum vibration as resonance. In fact, as Alain Connes details and explains, music theory also explains this noncommutativity time-frequency resonance. This makes sense if, as Penrose and Hameroff argue, reality is less of a computation but rather an understanding of consciousness as musical resonance. 

So the irony being. as Hameroff cites Aniriban Bandyopadhyay, is that the music resonance of quantum beats is NOT Western music!! It is from the "three gunas" of traditional Indian music - in terms of the Indian origin of Aniriban Bandyopadhyay. I have discussed this with Bandyopadhyay and he agreed that no one can "measure" the original Bloch Sphere of reality from noncommutivity or asymmetry as he acknowledges. Yet we can LISTEN to this source of reality and therefore through quantum biology we can literally resonate the source of light. This is called the "OM of Light" in the traditional Indian yoga philosophy. 

 So the secret of graphene is that the hexagon nanostructure is based on the quantum dipole as the "pi resonance" of the electrons. Meaning each electron is nonlocal as a 1/2 spin and therefore there is a superluminal signal - this is also the research claims of the Penrose/Hameroff investigations of the microtubules/tubulin in the neurons (and collagen our most common protein in the body). 

I should also defer to the research group of Professor Jack Tuszinski in Canada as the latest Science of Consciousness conference features his proteges. So in terms of the negentropy of quantum biology, this is defined by the decrease of gravitational entropy via the noncommutative protoconsciousness that is the source of quantum nonlocality. It's a well known fact in science now that quantum time-frequency uncertainty, the origin of the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle of momentum and position, also originates from noncommutativity. 

 http://www7.bbk.ac.uk/tpru/BasilHiley/noncommgeobohm.pdf

Basil J. Hiley - fascinating prose paper.

 "What I have tried to argue above is that for quantum processes space-time is not the basic manifold in which quantum processes evolve. The basic process unfolds in this pre-space, which is not subject to the Cartesian division, res extensa-res cogitans. What I want to suggest that it is in this pre-space that mind and matter appear as different aspects of the same underlying process....

Perhaps the clearest example of the role of this implicate order comes from listening to music. Listening is an active experience where we participate in the movement itself. We do not perceive a series of isolated notes. We hear new notes reverberating within the memory of the previous notes. This together with the anticipation of future notes constitutes an unbroken movement. What is apprehended, then, is an undivided state of flowing movement. We can argue that we directly perceive the implicate order because we become part of the total movement. We comprehend movement in terms of a series of inter-penetrating, intermingling elements of different degrees of enfoldment all present together."

 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491622000033 

It has been argued that spin is purely a quantum effect, but that conclusion is not correct. One can demonstrate the difference between 2π and 4π rotations in the macroscopic world as shown in the ‘‘belt trick’’ or variations of it [20]. The double valuedness of the symmetry group also has a profound implication for the canonical formalism of classical mechanics which is often overlooked. We will see that this leads to the appearance of gauge transformations which are necessary to preserve the Poincaré invariants. Furthermore we will also show, as an example, how gauge vector fields can be used to account for the appearance of Coriolis forces, purely classical effects. Understanding the classical canonical formalism in this way enables us to see quantum phenomena in a very different light and, in our view, makes the generalisation to the quantum domain much more easy to comprehend."

 peter

 @Voidisyinyang Voidisyinyang  This was such a good lecture. My favorite quote so far is "Our notion of point will emerge, a correlation of different frequencies". I always wondered what these channelers were talking about when they were explaining the concept of pinpointing locations in space/dimesional time based on frequencies. This statement, really gives it some grounding for me.
 @peter  yes the latest Basil J. Hiley noncommutative paper that I linked in my upload and my blog now - he explains (or actually it's that 2000 paper I linked) - that each point is an "idempotent" as being squared of the matrices. So this is the amplituded squared as probability - hence a "correlation" of frequencies. But as the music theory explains the Octave originally was defined as not just 2 as in a doubling of the 1 but as the Greater Octave or 4 that is a geometric mean or squaring (not doubling). And this double octave then covered up the noncommutativity to create a "point" as the continuum lie. haha.
 
 peter
Wow! I'm getting closer to getting this. I'm going to listen to this once a day for a week in hopes I can wrap my mind around d it... Thanks as always for sharing your wisdom..
1
Voidisyinyang Voidisyinyang
·
Wow Basil J. Hiley just debunked the Poisson Bracket! That's intense. "To return to the classical case of the Coriolis force, the motion of the particle on the surface of the earth rotates around the axis of rotation, which acts like a singularity that can contribute a factor of 2nπ to the circulation.6 It is here that we encounter the non-single valuedness of the rotation group. In intuitive terms this means that there are two topological types of closed curves γ on the surface of a sphere; those that encircle the rotation axis and those that do not. Since singularities are present, the above method of deriving the Lagrange bracket no longer holds and so any method using Poisson brackets will not hold. Thus Hamilton’s equations of motion and other methods based on infinitesimal transformations will not work unless there is some way of taking into consideration these global topological obstructions."

 There's this "cray cray" idea that technology can "refreeze the arctic" but the arctic ice is melting due to the ocean temperature increasing - mainly from the Mediterranean. So I don't see how people can stop the ocean currents? haha. Also even if they somehow refreeze the arctic that doesn't stop the CO2 emissions. So we've emitted already over half a trillion tons and a trillion tons will be 2 Degree Celsius global lock in for sure. Our temperature "goal post" keeps getting changed but really it should be from the late 1700s when coal burning kicked in big time. And of course the growth is exponential and so every time CO2 doubles then the Earth's temperature increases another 1 Degree Celsius. Then there's the Aerosol Masking Effect that NEVER gets mentioned now in the corporate-state media. It's TWICE as bad as previously thought so a 40% decrease in sulfur pollution from coal means another 1 Degree Celisus increase. Finally the oceans already have 240 Zetta Joules of CO2 emissions as HEAT stored up and that heat, as thermal mass, is radiating back out into the atmosphere. So our goose is cooked to be sure. Some people think due to other accelerating feedbacks that we have only five years left - check out the "arctic - news" blogspot for details

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment