Noncommutativity can be mimicked by commutative geometry adding another magnetic field to reality: Noncommutative predicts accelerating universe as Dynamical Dark Energy

 

 B. Vakili; P. Pedram; S. Jalalzadeh (2010). Late time acceleration in a deformed phase space model of dilaton cosmology. , 687(2-3), 119–123. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.016  

 So that's the new "spin field" as Nobel Physicist Yang calls it and Professor Hiley calls it the new force as "formative cause."...

 yeah Hiley uses the Moyal brackets I think...

 Fascinating indeed!!

As the Universe expands, the amount of dark energy in a given volume stays the same, but the matter and energy densities go down, and therefore so does the expansion rate. ... Both of these things are simultaneously true: the Universe is accelerating and the expansion rate is very slowly dropping.

 If dark energy does exist, we need to understand it, as it seems to account for 70% of all the matter in the Universe. Crucially, we want to understand whether it is constant in space and time (a cosmological constant), or it is dynamical, which would indicate a new type of physics.

 https://www.hilarispublisher.com/proceedings/dynamical-dark-energy-and-the-relativistic-bohmpoisson-equation-32700.html

Dynamical dark energy and the relativistic bohm-poisson equation

 Penrose's "'one-graviton' level" criterion forms the basis of his prediction, providing an objective criterion for wave function collapse.

 

This is why we’ve constructed our detectors in the fashion we’ve built them. When a gravitational wave passes through a detector like LIGO, one of the arms will compress while the other expands, and then vice versa, in a mutually oscillatory pattern. The LIGO detectors are deliberately placed at angles to one another and at different locations on Earth’s surface, so that no matter what the orientation is that the wave passes through, at most one detector will be immune to the gravitational wave signal.

In other words, no matter how the gravitational wave is oriented, there will always be a detector that experiences one arm shortening while the other one lengthens, in a predictable, oscillatory fashion, so long as the wave passes through the detector.

 

 Since the light moves through them both at the speed of light, the wavelength changes are unimportant; when they meet again, they’re at the same location in spacetime, and so their wavelengths will now be identical. What matters is that one beam of light spends longer in the detector, and so when they meet up again, they’re now out-of-phase. That’s where the LIGO signal comes from, and how we detect gravitational waves!

 

 

 

 

 

 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.02823.pdf

 

 

 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Dynamical-dark-energy-and-the-relativistic-equation-Perelmanp/cb510508020f5b9c0a6bf2046fbac5967365e29c