Brian Clegg in his The God Effect book recounts the 1930 Solvay Einstein "thought experiment" of a photon leaving a box - and the paradox of the relativistic mass of the photon or gravitational mass as defined by the frequency energy versus the particle position measured as the photon leaves the box. The idea by Einstein was to side step the inherent probability or indeterminate foundation of reality. Bohr pointed out that due to the reciprocal relation of time and frequency in relativity and quantum physics there would be an inherent uncertainty still to the experiment.
What Clegg doesn't point out is that experiment is completely based on the de Broglie-Einstein relation - the same "Law of Phase Harmony" that Roger Penrose uses as the basis for proto-consciousness from Godel's Incompleteness Theorem.
Sure enough I happened upon precisely this analysis of Einstein's 1930 "thought experiment.
https://www.academia.edu/4830107/Perspectives_on_the_EPR_and_the_measurement_problem
That article is twenty years old but there is a 2021 publication by the same physicist.
So going back to the original paper on the Einstein thought experiment:
So here we have the same basic argument of Roger Penrose about the proto-consciousness of the Universe. It's not just a mathematical axiom but an actual truth of the measurement problem.
And so due to Bell's Incompleteness Theorem being proven this means that the "microstate" of quantum physics as nonlocality is the foundation of reality even though it requires external macro-measurements of science to be incomplete and even more so "inconsistent."
So now we can turn to his latest publication, twenty years later, to see how his analysis has developed. He was relying on an early promotion of the "weak measurements" model - as a sub-quantum truth that has since been confirmed by Yakir Aharonov's research group.
Of course the standard view of the de Broglie-Bohm model rejects any implications of inherent proto-consciousness - I'm referring to Professor Jean Bricmont and his colleagues - in contrast to say Dr. Ruth E. Kastner, and Professor Basil J. Hiley who do not rule out such possibilities. Professor Paul S. Wesson also recognized the validity of the de Broglie-Bohm model to explain spiritual paranormal powers. De Broglie protege Olivier Costa de Beauregard was insistent that the de Broglie model proved the a priori truth of the paranormal through precognition creating telekinesis (antigravity) and telepathy.
So the empty wave....
No comments:
Post a Comment