So is MATT O'Dowd trying to make up for his gaff where he claimed that virtual photons did not exist in reality but were only a theoretical mathematical trick?
Boom - Matt O'Dowd now admits the truth of noncommutative phase as the foundation or "unobservable property" of reality - with powerful manifestation!!
Indeed.
By anti-symmetric he means noncommutative phase.
I'd like more explanation as to why the assumption is made that two electrons would resist entering the same state rather than simply annihilating each other as the math would seem to suggest.
I know that that this is demonstrated experimentally, but how does the math indicate a preference for one outcome rather than the other?
@Herman Von Petri particles with 1/2 integer spin cannot occupy the same state. its the Pauli Exclusion Principle.
I asked the same thing over on science asylum.
@Scumfuck McDoucheface its just the way it is. we just happen to be in a universe where these values and property's allow for life. so of course the values are what they are its an observer bias.
@Herman Von Petri If you read Nobel physicist Gerard 't Hooft's article, "Light is Heavy" - he argues that the electron is actually made up of light. Dr. Fred Alan Wolf also presents this view in his TedX talk. But Matt O'Dowd previously tried to claim that virtual photons are just a mathematical theory since they're unobservable. Yet recent experiments actually do "capture" virtual photons now and turn the virtual photons into real photons. So Matt O'Dowd hinted at this when he brought in the Dirac equation. Basically the 1/2 spin of the electron is actually noncommutative phase from Heisenberg - as Dirac realized the math of the Poisson Bracket is from matrices that are noncommutative.
@Leto Jaxa sure only Louis de Broglie already figured this out due to the Law of Phase Harmony in his critique of relativity. Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Dürr, former head of the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Munich "That is the reason why when people are doing quantum physics, if you only use quantum mechanics, they do not see the difference. Only if you go into relativistic theory, you have not only one, but an infinite number of them, disappearing as matter and occurring at interactions. So we are in a way mislead by Schroedinger who said, "Why do we need the Matrix mechanics of Heisenberg, when with only the algebra I make the Schrodinger equation that is in space and time. And that is the way, to my mind, the reason why we are on the wrong track. If the biologists try to get an understanding of biology is a complicated [interrupted] of the old physics. They make it so complicated...if you have dead matter and glue it together....it will never get alive."
No comments:
Post a Comment