Gravity is a force that we logically infer; we make it up: Ian Morison on Einstein's theory of general realivity

 In Einstein's view, our Earth is going around the Sun simply because that's what things do in curved space. There's no force being applied to it. It just thinks it's going in a straight line.

Gravity is a force that we INFER: We make it up: to explain what happens in a curved three dimensional space; if we believe or assume that the space is flat, NOT curved.

Ian Morison - Proving Einstein right!

 

 Too bad he used the wrong colors together. haha.

So what noncommutative phase logic states is that there NEVER is an assumption of straight lines. Spacetime is inherently curved asymmetrically and therefore in eternal motion.

SAme lecture in High Def!!

 Yep he's repeating the SAME lecture only nine years later!!

So the curved space is CONCENTRATING the photons and therefore acting as a gravitational lens.

 

 Ian Morison in his 2nd lecture, nine years later:

AND THIS IS SOMETHING I'VE MADE UP: I hope it's true but I'VE NEVER HEARD IT ANYWHERE ELSE.

Gravity is a force that we infer: We MAKE UP, to explain what happens in a curved three dimensional space if we assume that space is flat, not curved. Because we can't CONCEIVE of Curved Space; it's a force we make up.

So noncommutative phase logic IS curved space!! Euclidian space was wrong.

Nonwestern music theory is correct.

That's why my 1996 manifesto was called "The Fundamental Force" and my friend jokingly said I was referring to "action at a distance."

 So he says how if the Earth clocks receiving the GPS signal are not set SLOWER then the GPS signal would be in error by 10 km or 6 miles.

I had a post some 15 years ago called "Was Einstein Wrong?" and it was precisely about this claim.

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR614/MR614.pdf

 

Considering our "smart" missiles MISSED their targets then I guess there were still "operational issues."....

Methods for determining target coordinates in a relative GPS frame are presented which allow for removal of GPS related system bias errors. Missile accuracy also depends on the missile platform-target geometry and missile flight trajectory. Short range standoff trajectories can stress the time required for the missile's GPS receiver to acquire and track the satellite signals. In addition, the jamming vulnerability of the GPS receiver in an operational environment is of major concern. The paper presents a review of the major jamming parameters such as the defense's effective radiated jamming power, potential GPS anti-jam enhancements, and jamming range to break GPS signal track.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/1061/why-does-gps-depend-on-relativity 

 If you look at the wikipedia page about GPS and relativistic corrections, they make it clear that this 10km/day drift applies to the 'pseudoranges' - the initial distance calculated between the receiver and each satellite. This error would cancel out in solving the triangulation problem to obtain the receiver position, since it is a an equal error in all the satellite clocks.

 Two US professors of high GPS pedigree, independently explained that the '10km/day' claim presupposes that between 1 and 3 of the satellites used for a 4 satellite fix do not incorporate the 38us/day clock rate ('factory') offset.

 Ian Morison:

If we sort of in our imagination, had a wonderful optical telescope, we could look the longer way, seeing FUrther back in time, we could see a couple being later - while SIMULTANEOUSLY we could look the other way and see their baby being born!!

It shows you that time and space get mixed up.

So the curvature of spacetime causes a brightening of distance objects... due to the concentration of the photons.