So ancient nonwestern cultures seemed simplistic by just counting numbers for time and also frequency as ratios of music. In fact noncommutative phase science uses music theory to explain the concept of noncommutative phase!!
So this is easy to overlook as instead we are told that noncommutative phase CREATES spacetime! Yes because space is commutative amplitude as wavelength squared. So it was created by Archytas and Philolaus from the wrong music theory.
Science then says time-frequency uncertainty is from noncommutative phase. Yes but as Louis de Broglie discovered the Law of Phase Harmony is actually just the ancient nonwestern music tuning of subharmonics and overtones at the same time.
Science calls it "negative frequency" instead of subharmonic even though Stuart Hameroff and Professor JohnJoe McFadden both emphasize the SECRET of room temperature warm quantum coherence is due to musical resonance!!
So Dr. Mae-Wan Ho called this "quantum jazz" and Hameroff explains that it's like an orchestra but uses nonwestern tuning (like the three gunas of India or Daoist tuning)....
Hameroff gives a great talk for Gerry Pollack's quantum water conference
Since Free Will is proven by Quantum Mechanics - as Dr. Stuart Hameroff details and also Dr. Ruth E. Kastner - and also Professor Olivier Costa de Beauregard - I Pre-cognitively Preempted this vid and debunked it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEoHgMuYwHE&ab_channel=VoidisyinyangVoidisyinyang Noncommutative of the Paranormal: Olivier Costa de Beauregard Dr. Emilio Del Giudice Dr. Mae-Wan Ho https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3470100/ How quantum brain biology can rescue conscious free will and so https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztGNznlowic
Roger Penrose - Quantum Physics of Consciousness interview
"According to Aharonov"
Hameroff
Accommodating Retrocausality with Free Will
Retrocausal models of QM add further weight to the conflict between causality and the possible existence of free will. We analyze a simple closed causal loop ensuing from the interaction between two systems with opposing thermodynamic time arrows, such that each system can forecast future events for the other. The loop is avoided by the fact that the choice to abort an event thus forecasted leads to the destruction of the forecaster's past. Physical law therefore enables prophecy of future events only as long as this prophecy is not revealed to a free agent who can otherwise render it false. This resolution is demonstrated on an earlier finding derived from the Two-State-Vector Formalism (TSVF), where a weak measurement's outcome anticipates a future choice, yet this anticipation becomes apparent only after the choice has been actually made. To quantify this assertion, "weak information" is described in terms of Fisher information. We conclude that an already existing future does not exclude free will nor invoke causal paradoxes. On the quantum level, particles can be thought of as weakly interacting according to their past and future states, but causality remains intact as long as the future is masked by quantum indeterminism.
https://www.neuroelectrics.com/blog/2014/12/18/the-physics-of-neuroscience/
Interestingly Cifra and colleagues have also done a lot of work with microtubules, small structures found in cells, including neurons, that are the stars of Stuart Hameroffs, again controversial, theory of quantum consciousness (Orchestrated objective reduction) developed along with physicist Roger Penrose. One of the consequences of this work is that we experience reality through a series of conscious moments driven by quantum processes at a rate of about 40Hz. Hameroff claims that experienced meditators (and Michael Jordan) run at a higher clock rate so experience more reality per second than the rest of us. This explains why, for Jordan, time seems to slow down when he is in the zone.
Accuracy is more important than precision. Quantum mechanics plus relativity = noncommutative phase as the accurate foundation of reality. This is actually more mathematical physics. So everyone taking classical physics based on symmetric logic from commutative math has been brainwashed with an inaccurate foundation of reality! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIziuv-WLMM Connes explains noncommutative music theory. So in fact the wrong math as the basis for the wrong physics (very precise yet INaccurate) is from the wrong music theory! Newton learned Pythagorean music theory from Archtyas but Archytas learned it from Eudoxus and Eudoxus lied about music theory. As Math professor Luigi Borzacchini exposed - the secret music origins of Western math is "really astonishing" and "shocking" and a "deep pre-established disharmony" as the guiding "evoltive principle" of science.
Hi Drew!
ReplyDeleteI was recently looking up the books by Luigi Borzacchini in order to investigate one of your claims, namely that "with his book Plato's Computer, [Borzacchini] argues that our future will inevitably be some kind of artificial intelligence take over by machines."
All I could find were two of his articles, "Incommensurability, Music and Continuum: A Cognitive Approach" and "Light as a Metaphor of Science".
He apparently published three books, namely "The Plato's Computer", "The Ockham's Computer" and "The Kant's Computer".
However, none of them seem to have been translated into English and they remain in their original Italian.
Your claim seems to suggest that you've read "The Plato's Computer". Are you aware of any English translation of the book?
Thanks in advance!
yes thank you very much for looking into my claim. That is very rare for someone to actually research my claim. haha. I have corresponded with Professor Borzacchini several times - starting with a scrawled note I sent him with an equation I made up - back around 2001. And now he is retired but he does "tweet." Yes his books are not translated into English. His website goes into his same ideas found in his Plato's Computer book. I think I used google translate to translate part of his Plato's Computer book.
DeleteHe is also on Academia.edu - his Italian
So I'll see what I can translate of his Plato's Computer book. His website goes into artificial intelligence. But he argues that there will always be this cognitive disconnect due to "incommensurability" and paradoxes of math originated from music theory.
LUIGI BORZACCHINI
DeleteThe Plato's computer
The origins of logical and mathematical thought
reprint
preface by Piergiorgio Odifreddi
first edition 2005
An attempt to make a cognitive history on the beginning of syntactical paradigm in the Greeks antiquity, between mathematics, logics and philosophy, in order to discover the roots of the modern civilization: the computer.
https://www.edizionidedalo.it/foreign-rights/the-plato-s-computer.html
The book is an inquiry into the genesis of formal thinking, i.e. that human skill based on the manipulation of signs according to rules which forms the basis of computer performance and which appears substantially as the idea of representation/interpretation between reality and (natural or formal) language. This idea, even if obvious for us today, is not free of paradoxes that arise from the use of words concerning negative, being, truth, etc., and the book analyzes the appearance of paradoxes of formal thinking, as the «paradox of the negative judgment» or the «paradox of the liar», from Parmenides to the Sophists, Plato and Aristotle. The book argues that formal thinking was absent in pre-Greek civilizations and that it first appears in ancient Greece, in philosophy, mathematics and logic. Many chapters describe the evolution of dialectics and logic through the Aristotelian theory of science. For a comparative history the book deals with the problem of formal thinking and the related paradoxes in Chinese civilization. In order to show that Greek mathematics was born as the embedding of pre-Greek mathematical techniques in the frame of formal thinking, the book tries to answer some foundational historical questions: How did the ideas of infinite and continuity emerge? In Greek mathematics, why was there no 0, and why was 1 not a number? Why was the idea of a real number not even imagined? Where did the idea of proof (and of proof by contradiction) come from?
https://www.dm.uniba.it/~psiche
DeleteSo that was his website but it no longer exists!
He discussed artificial intelligence on the site.
I'll try find more.
a "radical opposition and incompatibility between science and philosophy", a belief that - underlines Borzacchini - "is one of the dominant characteristics of twentieth century thought" (p. 75).
DeleteHere, the computer of the twentieth century did not "appear as a miracle", or "like Athena already armed with the head of Zeus", as some would seem willing to believe: yes, it is "a sudden 'apparition', but it is also a 'karst river' whose origins are distant "and" can be found in Greek civilization "(p. 18). They find themselves in his anthropology, in the emergence of that very powerful "machine" - if we wanted to resort to the last of our metaphors - which was from the beginning the literate mind of the European man: "our oral language can be generated from a regular grammar, while our written language must be generated from a more complex grammar ", so that" our brain alone is a relatively simple machine, but [...] when it settles into the 'world of signs' it becomes a much more complex machine ”. In other words: "having a potentially unlimited external world on which to 'read / write' signs and move freely, the 'mind' can be structured like a Turing machine" (pp. 51-52).
http://www.recensionifilosofiche.info/2006/09/borzacchini-luigi-il-computer-di.html
The science of the twentieth century will build on
ReplyDeletedirect and univocal relationship between reality and language,
without the need to consider 'thought' as
intermediary between the two: it will be in psychology the
behavior, it will be linguistically
structuralism, formalism will be in mathematics, the disappearance of gods will be in physics
'Mechanical models', from Mach's phenomenology to standard interpretation
of quantum mechanics, neo-positivism will be in the philosophy of science. There
end of the millennial strategic function of the mind as a bridge between
language and reality, opens the way to the simulation of the reasoning that
will characterize Artificial Intelligence: simply reduce thinking a
language (more or less standard logic or an autonomous 'mentalese') or the
cerebral neurological reality (connectionism, cellular automata, neural networks).
Frege's logic had also introduced a revolutionary idea: calculus, in
past pure practical tool, and demonstration, in the past the most form
prized of rationality, they turned out to be coincident: the proof was
became a purely syntactic manipulation, and the computation was reducible to
a demonstration.
In this climate, Alan M. Turing resumes his investigation of the laws of thought of
Boole, addressing a theme that the crisis of Hilbert's formalism had left behind
open: the nature of the algorithm and its role in intelligence and science
[1]. The style of his famous On computable numbers is that of Boole: una
introspective investigation into the functioning of the mind. Turing analyzes the 'computer'
(ie the "man who calculates") to formalize it. It does not appear in the Turing article
never the word intelligence, and the word mind appears in the 'states of mind' whose
purely calculus is clear in the fact that they can be replaced with
'Notes of instructions', which simply explain how to organize the work,
and are therefore introduced only to indicate the analysis of the mental operations of
he who calculates.
https://www.academia.edu/42338029/Le_radici_concettuali_del_computer?auto=download
It is the culmination of the Cambridge spirit as in
ReplyDeleteformalism of the Turing machine any possible algorithm can be formalized
syntactic, and the universal machine outlines the architecture of the future computer
providing the final form of the general idea of the computable - all that is possible
do by manipulating signs according to rules -: is the calculus ratiocinator delineated by
Leibniz which is realized in universal programming languages. And Cantor to the
the end of the century had shown how with a set of numbers it was possible
encode any set of data, however expressible in any alphabet:
will be the characteristica universalis of computer science, as it means that
each dataset can be represented with strings of 0 and 1 [3].