The "dismissals" of her paper are not convincing. She is stating the genetic cleavages were inserted in previous research on the same virus. Also she is not saying it did not originate from bats - only the bats were military lab bats. Also she points out the supposed natural bat origin - it infects human ACE-2 receptor but when tested it did NOT infect bat ACE-2 receptor. So she argues that supposed natural bat was a fraud to cover up the military origin bat use. She provides evidence for her claims - it's only because the claim goes against the mainstream view that people are not willing to accept the implications.
Amazingly most of the dismissals of her claims have not even READ her science!
https://elixirfield.blogspot.com/2020/09/dr-li-meng-yan-says-pandemic-was.html
“SARS-CoV also used ACE2 as a cellular receptor, as do other SARS-like bat coronaviruses,” Rasmussen says. “It is not suspicious and is in fact expected that the receptor binding domains that bind the same protein would be similar.”
That claim by Rasmussen is just straight up incorrect! SARS-CoV relied on the Palm Civet to establish the ACE-2 so that the Palm Civet had to then infect the humans. The SARS-CoV bat source did NOT have the ACE-2 activation ability.
That's what makes SARS-CoV-2 way different. The Wuhan lab had used a MOUSE coronavirus to establish that indeed it could be added to the ACE-2 activation and thereby made contagious to humans. But since the Covid-19 did not have a mouse backbone then scientists said it MUST not be lab created.
So then the Chinese scientists claimed to have found a natural bat that DOES have the ACE-2 activation ability - but corroboration of this claim has not held up - since it ONLY infects HUMAN ACE-2 and not Bat Ace-2.
It has been speculated that RRAR, a unique furin-like cleavage site (FCS) in the spike protein (S), which is absent in other lineage B βCoVs, such as SARS-CoV, is responsible for its high infectivity and transmissibility. A coronavirus (CoV) infects the target cell by either cytoplasmic or endosomal membrane fusion.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-020-0184-0
"Rasmussen also said that the paper misrepresented basic facts about another part of coronavirus spike proteins known as furin cleavage sites. The authors claim that SARS-CoV-2’s cleavage site is “unique” and unseen elsewhere in nature. But according to Rasmussen, “Furin cleavage sites occur naturally in many other beta-CoVs, including MERS-CoV and other SARS-like bat coronaviruses.”
WRONG AGAIN! https://www.thedailybeast.com/steve-bannon-linked-groups-push-study-claiming-china-manufactured-covid "
So then we are told that because the website with MORE evidence - is being funded by a Steve Bannon collaborator in China - a billionaire - then it should be dismissed as more right-wing Anti-China propaganda...
The question is do two wrongs make a right? Just because the evidence is strong does not mean that the Bannon crowd are also not the problem...
However, undergoing a natural evolution, the possibility of 100% identical E protein between the cross-species 2019 nCoV and ZS bat-CoV is almost impossible.
Curcumin, Tumeric and Ginger all inhibit ACE-2
Coverup of the Century - mini-report on CCP coverup - of pandemic - intentional?
No comments:
Post a Comment