https://elixirfield.blogspot.com/2019/11/how-noncommutative-logic-explains.html
How Noncommutative Logic explains biological growth: new Caltech Ph.D. thesis
So based on my previous blog post - similarly there is a new Professor Michael Corballis paper on the evolution of human language.
Evolution’s great mystery - Michael Corballis 124,265 views •Aug 24, 2020
So that vid does not emphasize what I pointed out in the comments. The asymmetrical right hand (left brain) bias of modern humans...
From Mouth to Hand: Gesture, Speech, and the Evolution of Right-Handedness
Humanity and the left hemisphere: The story of half a brain
- June 2020
- Laterality
These asymmetries are not indicative of language itself, but suggest that the lateralization of speech may have longstanding precursors.
So I had this discussion with Professor Corballis about 15 years ago. I documented this at the time in my early self-published rants. haha. I said that birds also have recursive language only it is due to changes in time-frequency signals. So that one above statement by Corballis is a whole new revolution in science. He is stating that human language evolved out of right hand tool use but that this process of a left brain and right hand dynamic is already found in various forms in other life species going back about 170 million years ago.
Crow’s theory also implies that species-wide cerebral asymmetry and handednessSo we know that music is right brain dominant as frequency. But learning sound as frequency is different than learning musical "arranging" as a grammatical language. Trained musicians also have a stronger left brain bias towards music beyond the inherent right brain frequency processing of harmonics and resonance.
are unique to humans, but cerebral and behavioural asymmetries are
widespread in the animal kingdom (Rogers, Vallortigara, & Andrew, 2013).
Chomsky is probably right in asserting that only humans are capable of
true language, but the left-hemispheric control of vocalization itself has
been demonstrated even in the frog, suggesting an ancestry that may go
back to the very origins of the vocal cords some 170 million years ago (Bauer, 1993).
(4) grammatical (noncommutative) concatenation of signs.
The structure and evolution of symbol
So when we "think" as Chomsky points out there is a deeper hidden logic in the brain that enables children to listen to something that is unheard. As the above research emphasizes this logic in biology is actually Noncommutative phase logic. I also pointed this out about Chomsky's research, in an earlier blog post. And so human "thinking" as Corballis emphasizes, is a coevolution of our right hand bias in tool use because we then needed to switch from using right handed gestures to using left brain controlled sounds.
So since music is right brain dominant as frequency then language is based on simply a noncommutative structure of sounds as phonemes, using phase. So then the sound remains the same despite the frequency changing for switching to phonetic written language. Whereas the older human language is the more musical and thus more frequency based it is. So then the oldest human language has the most sophisticated use of sounds and frequencies while the San Bushmen original human culture has also the most sophisticated training for harmonization of emotions as spiritual healing energy.
So as Corballis emphasizes the left brain bias in using vocal sounds for communication is even found in frogs but frogs also rely on antiphony, meaning the male and female voices are an octave apart as frequency harmonics. Acoustic ecology has proven that indeed there is an orchestra of harmonization in ecology with each animal developing a timing niche as well as frequency. This dynamic of ecology as evolution then is, just as in biology itself, driven by noncommutative phase logic.
The lingering belief that humans are special has often provoked a search
for the ingredient that defines our uniqueness. To Aristotle it was our “more
exquisite symmetry of parts”—something of an irony in the light of the
recent emphasis on asymmetry. One eighteenth-century writer attached
special importance to the nose: “Man is, I believe, the only animal that has
a marked projection in the middle of the face” (Price, 1810, p. 223)—he
appears to have overlooked the elephant. To Descartes, it was the pineal
gland.
So there is nothing "special" about human language. As I have pointed out with babies then the third eye is open. Corballis references twice the claim of Descartes that the origin of human language in the brain was the pineal gland as the connection to our infinite soul. But this claim of the pineal gland as "symmetry" is simply a Western bias due to Plato. It LOOKS symmetric but biology has proven that the vagus nerve is asymmetric and the vagus nerve is what controls the pineal gland functioning. So the right side vagus nerve DOES connect to the left side of the brain but the left side vagus nerve does NOT connect to the right side of the brain.
So Stan Gooch emphasized this role of the larger cerebellum in Neanderthals for their paranormal spiritual abilities with the brain being cross-wired. So the vagus nerve is what creates this cross wiring function. Musicians training from before age nine then have shown, in contrast to any other type of human cultural training, to have a much larger corpus callosum.
Later still, Gazzaniga (2000) asked “Does theSo Corballis excellently critiques Jaynes and even Gazzaniga
corpus callosum enable the human condition?” As the left brain evolved its special capacities, he argued, these were at the cost of perceptual functions
previously housed bilaterally. These were then retained in the right hemisphere,
a legacy of our primate heritage, while the corpus callosum enabled
the newfound powers of the left to be integrated with the routine functions
of the right. Gazzaniga describes the left hemisphere as the interpreter, “the
glue that keeps our story unified and creates our sense of being a coherent
rational agent” (p. 1320).
What we need to realize here then is that meditation spiritual training is going against the very foundation of what it means to be "human" itself as defined by using right hand dominant technology and left brain dominant grammar as our so-called "special" human language. But rather than humans as being an expression of some kind of secret infinite connection to God due to our language skills, we need to realize that we are destroying ecology itself due to the left brain's inherent biases of a contained symbolic structure. So by glorifying the supposed infinite permutations of a digital language system we try to disconnect it from the way infinite is defined in the West.
So by projecting this symmetric definition of infinity onto Nature then we have reversed the negentropy of Life (as Schroedinger points out) such that right-hand dominant technology is destroying left-hand dominant based life (amino acids) with right-brain bias of noncommutative phase time-frequency energy.
No comments:
Post a Comment