Monday, August 31, 2020

Konstantin Meyl Scalar wave = Eric Dollard Tesla wave tries to equal (but does NOT equal) quantum spin energy = Maxwell's electrical potential energy

That is a mistake. A friend had written that many many years ago and I didn’t catch that.

Thanks for the heads up on that.

A better explanation is that the Tuning resonance peak is found by turning the amplitude dial.

 Don Paris replies to me about the "mistake" in his radionics mass mailing promotional.

 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335271748_Magnetic_Wave_Transmission_of_Drug_Effects_about_the_Waves_Generated_in_the_Measurement_Set-Up_and_Used_ie_for_Anticancer-Treatments/link/5f16a1b292851c1eff23d6ef/download

So Don Paris, promoter and seller of Radionics, says he uses the same type of Scalar waves as Konstantin Meyl. How many other researchers even cite Meyl? Ah Yupapin does!

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/21691401.2012.759124

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Task of the introns, cell ... - NCBI

Sep 18, 2011 - RETRACTED ARTICLE: Task of the introns, cell communication explained by field physics. Konstantin Meyl. Additional article information ...
by K Meyl - ‎2012 - ‎Cited by 9 - ‎Related articles

 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Konstantin_Meyl

 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296628742_A_critical_consideration_of_the_theories_by_Konstantin_Meyl

 Neither his longitudinal or scalar waves nor his potential burbles follow a straightforward reasoning. Concerning longitudinal waves, it is noted that these are well-known within the classical Maxwell theory - typically in combination with transversal field components, even though Meyl claims the opposite. in summary, nothing was found in Meyl's theories that meets any scientific requirement whenever it goes beyond well-established scientific knowledge. Moreover, careful experimental analyses [5, 6] of Meyl's demonstration kit for scalar waves could not reveal anything remarkable.

see https://sci-hub.tw/10.1515/FREQ.2003.57.9-10.174

dang the article is in German...  

1. Introduction For some time now Konstantin Meyl has been more or less arousing spectacular statements on all kinds of natural science Appearances the attention of many popular science Circles. Broader public classes and Relevant specialist groups are also informed through the Internet, books and cleverly staged lecture events addressed. At first glance, many of Meyl's statements seem to be halfway sensible, but show something deeper Checks usually very quickly numerous contradictions and above all gaps in the argument. Very The preface is instructive in this context of Meyl's first book [1]: “... The cited Examples and contributions solely for suggestion and motivation serve and do not claim to be complete in any way or correctness .... ". Without" no "claim to "Correctness" is certainly not difficult with all possible Speculation to the public and anyone who this Speculation should pay attention to himself ask himself what he can expect from it. Independently of Meyl claims to describe his statements mathematically and to prove theoretically.
This article looks at some of the
Arguments a little closer to show that Meyl in places where he delivers concrete statements that deviate from the established theory, mostly in irresolvable contradictions involved.
In other places it tries to be vague To think further along Meyl's statements according to its implications, until here too the usual contradictions are evident become.
Finally, some physical phenomena are discussed,
which Meyl would like to re-explain through his theories, which however for many years within the framework of classical theories can be described completely without contradiction and Both theoretically and practically understood excellently become.
Against the classical Maxwellian theory, Meyl in Equation (6) its so-called potential density b and equation (8) completely newly introduced. Since this is in the context of the classic Interpretation of the existence of magnetic space charges (Monopolies) would mean, and he didn't the fact doubts that such has not yet been observed, he goes one step further and doubts this dual also the existence of electric space charges (monopoles).
As a result, the usual electrical space charge density is missing in (2) pe. He does not doubt that electrical charge quanta can be observed, however, he claims that these are basically dipoles due to potential vortices acts where the opposite pole is in the center of the charge and is not accessible for measurement purposes. More on this follows in the section on potential vortices. At this point, first Meyl's demand for perfect duality be illuminated a little more closely. The duality comparison of (7) and (8) shows that the newly introduced so-called hydrotic conductivity Kb actually around a specific one magnetic resistance according to the specific electrical Resistance p acts. This is crucial if you look at Meyl's "answer to the key questions" (Existence of electrical and magnetic monopoles) in [2] takes a closer look. Meyl writes: “In the ideal vacuum there are no charge carriers at all, which is why there are no currents no current vortices and consequently no magnetic poles can exist. "
"No currents" means electrical conductivity K = 0 and thus the specific electrical resistance goes p- * 00, because = l / p assuming complete duality and the fact that electrical and magnetic quantities in ideal vacuum are certainly equal, requires that too no magnetic currents (corresponding to Meyl's potential density b) can be present and that KI, = - »°° apply got to. In contrast to this, Meyl argues completely arbitrarily: "At the same time, the hydrotic conductivity KI, minimal, the potential density and thus also the potential vortex maximum. This vortex forms electrical poles .... It is due to the boundary condition of the microcosm attributed that without exception electrically charged particles are entitled to exist. ".
Obviously this boundary condition of the microcosm consists in that Meyl completely arbitrarily the behavior of magnetic quantities in contrast to that of the electrical quantities and thus in contradiction to the duality that he himself demands. As a conclusion, it should be noted at this point that there is no physical or theoretical justification for existence the Meyl's potential density 6 and accordingly its hydrotic conductivity IQ, there. That’s his theories Basically, the basis has already been withdrawn at this point.
in the
rest it should be noted at this point that it is in the classical
electromagnetic field theory is quite common and useful
is to work with fully dual Maxwell's equations.
The Meyl potential density is thereby - as already indicated
- called the magnetic current density, and there is about it
also magnetic space charges. However, in
this context does not claim that these are magnetic
Quantities physically exist, rather it is about
purely virtual sizes that allow for a more elegant formulation of the
theoretical apparatus can be used.
3. The fundamental field equation The derivation of Meyl's fundamental field equation is one Standard task of vector analysis when considering the equations (1) to (8) take for granted. Since this derivation, however only applies to constant material parameters, but arises immediately the question of what is supposed to be fundamental about this equation?
The equation is e.g. in [2] as Eq. (11) to find and is to think ahead, until here too the usual contradictions are evident become. Finally, some physical phenomena are discussed, which Meyl would like to re-explain through his theories, which however for many years within the framework of classical theories can be described completely without contradiction and Both theoretically and practically understood excellently become.
...
Meyl is adept enough to use his potential vortices never gives a formulaic description, e.g. then could be checked to see if it could solve its own field equations represents. The interpretation is accordingly the potential vortex relies on Meyl's indications to be supplemented by assumptions that are as realistic as possible. According to his statements (e.g. [2] page 18), a wave, which propagates at the speed of light, due to a symmetry disorder Roll up into a ball vortex. Obviously goes the time-varying wave thereby into a static structure over as indicated in picture 1, and at which just as much Energy is bound inside, how to get out, with the particles now appearing as an electrical monopole Can determine interaction with its environment
According to the usual rules of field theory, it is the so-called potential vortex, as shown in Figure 1 and e.g. is also
illustrated on the title page of [2], by no means around a 57 (2003) vortex, but a pure gradient field. Since a gradient 9-10 ten field always arises from divergences (sources), this can Potential vortex certainly not a solution of the "generalized" Meyl's equations Eq. (1) - (8) represent.
One lets Disregarding this, if the structure in picture 1 were still nonsensical, since one can easily show that with the indicated arrangement of the plus and minus pole is the space outside the minus pole would be field-free. However, it is suggested to Meyl at this point that to change his potential vortex so that only "half" Positive pole is in the center and the other half in infinity which at least resolves this contradiction would.
AH so there is the hidden noncommutative 
phase logic!!
Independently of this, however, Meyl claims that his potential vortex in a similar way to the dipoles on side S in [2] a divergence-free potential density b arise. This would be from him to indicate what the potential density b looks like, the one Potential vortices generated as in Figure 1. To the trouble which he will have to clarify, for example, that from equations (1) - (8) one can obtain continuity conditions can deduce from which it can be seen that the dielectric Displacement density D no jumps in the direction of flow may have. The electric field strength can correspond accordingly according to D - only have jumps in the normal direction, when they change the material properties by leaps and bounds. How with it a sudden reversal of the field strength direction, like shown in Figure 1, can be achieved, would be explained by Meyl.
Another example of Meyl's contradicting lines of reasoning
can be found e.g. on page 28ff in [2] when he
the various elementary particles with its potential vortices
explained. He writes: “As is well known, every electrical field has one
result in a vertical magnetic field on it. "Some
Lines on you can find: “Magnetic and electric field lines
now run parallel to the surface of the sphere. "Another
Comment on this is certainly not necessary. Similar pointlessness
can always be found in Meyl's representations
again.
5. Deriving the Schrödinger equation from the fundamental field equation Deriving the Schrödinger equation from its fundamental Meyl describes the field equation as one of the most important theoretical evidence for his theories. Because of this you should the reasoning, as it can be found in [1], is something in the following be considered more closely. The starting point is the so-called fundamental field equation for the magnetic field strength H, Eq. (83) in [1], (in analogy to the somewhat differently written Eq. (6) above)
This approach Meyl calls it periodically, although this is not the case is. A periodic approach would have to be time-dependent of the form e "" * included. In contrast, the real exponent leads to e-function in Eq. (12) together with the minus sign to form a exponentially decaying time dependence. This means, that any field solution that Meyl describe with this approach can, vanishes asymptotically towards zero if the exponential Decline not due to the further time dependency in fir, /) is compensated.
The half-life of this decay process depends about on the electromagnetic material parameters. In free space one would have to come from duality and For reasons of symmetry, assume that both p - »°° and KTh - »° o apply, as has already been explained above. In this Case = 0, and any further consideration of Meyl's Derivations would be irrelevant. If * 0, then how would already mentioned, every possible solution function and thus everything what Meyl wants to describe with it (matter, ...) disappear asymptotically.
A compensation for this decay process is at Meyl is not envisaged because after some reshaping of (11) using (12) with the further approach (13) continues. The time dependency chosen here is now periodic, and what Meyl does with it can possibly be considered awesome or better described as brazen. When evaluating the temporal derivatives of (·, /) he partly uses the already time dependency, sometimes ignoring it:
Finally, he directs using the time dependency specified (13) a differential equation for the function 9fcr) with any time dependence, which he calls the Schrödinger equation designated. Conclusion: Meyl's derivation of the Schrödinger The equation is based on absolutely senseless assumptions

  and supplements

this through completely arbitrary and unjustified

 arithmetic manipulation.

From a physically conclusive or also theoretically consistent derivation of the Schrödinger equation absolutely nothing can be seen.
Meyl brings scalar or longitudinal waves mainly in context with electromagnetic compatibility environment (EMVU) into play, claiming that these, from the classic Maxwell's equations not described, scalar waves - also called Tesla radiation by him - biological phenomena be able to convey and explain. Starting point of his - very brief - theoretical considerations on this topic is the wave equation in the form [3
which corresponds to the fundamental field equation if TI, T2 - »» Is accepted. Meyl claims that his scalar waves can be described by the grad div Js-Tenn of this equation. If so, it would be both classic and also contradict Meyl's Maxwell equations, because for the derivation of (16) was by definition provided that div is E - 0. Without this assumption, the Equation in the form
This is in fact a longitudinal wave, which spreads in the x-direction and the one £, component having. In addition, the wave propagates at the usual speed of light c off. Meyl postulates a whole range of Scalar waves that move at different speeds expand, but he gives the corresponding solutions of (18) not on. At this point it should be noted that the term propagation speed of a wave is often not as clear as one might think. So it is e.g. expedient, between terms such as phase velocity and group velocity or to differentiate between the speed of energy. On the At first glance, the phase velocity appears very often of a wave as its speed of propagation. Indeed more complicated waveforms (solutions of classical Maxwell's equations) any phase velocities from 0 to °°.
The upper limit of the speed of light applies to the speed of the energy or Transport of information, usually via group speed given is. Absolutely false information that Meyl constantly

  spreads,

is the fact that the classical Maxwell equations, z. B. in the form of the wave equation (17), only

describe transverse waves. Under so-called far field conditions in the homogeneous free space, this statement is asymptotically correct, however can be the solutions of Maxwell's equations in general Take on a variety of manifestations, which do not necessarily have to be a solution of (17), since these derived for the special case of a homogeneous solution area and does not contain any excitation terms.
Meyl cites the near field as an example of his scalar waves a dipole antenna (Fig. 2 in [3]), which he even illustrates graphically. Has anyone ever asked him where did he get the field line images shown? They are exact the field line pictures, which are shown in common antenna books are (see e.g. [4]), and which are solutions of the classical Maxwell's equations result. That is, the classic Maxwell's equations are quite capable of Describe longitudinal waves. The term antenna near field is very familiar to classical antenna engineers. In general, these are solutions to Maxwell's equations a mixture of longitudinal and transverse field components. Examples of this are the antenna fields already discussed, Waveguide waves or guided waves at material boundary layers, like the so-called bump, the subject of the next section will be. Conclusion: the theoretical Reason for Meyl's longitudinal or scalar waves is wrong. Already the classic Maxwell equations describe electromagnetic waves that are a mixture of Represent longitudinal and transverse waves.
Finally, there should be a reference to Meyl's experiment kit allows to prove the existence of its scalar waves should. The kit has been purchased from various reputable institutions examined in detail and it was found that the behavior of the kit based on classic electrical engineering and Maxwell's theory can be described excellently. There was no evidence of scalar waves, with von Meyl postulated properties, can be found [S, 6].
Another false statement that Meyl spreads
 in his lectures,
is the claim that antennas only have standing waves can receive. There are both resonating antennas like Dipoles, on which standing waves form, as well as so-called "Traveling Wave" antennas on which the transition from guided line waves to the so-called sky waves occurs

in a continuous manner (e.g. Hörn and Vivaldi antennas).
7. The phenomenon of wave propagation The phenomenon of bump propagation is discussed by Meyl very often cited as evidence for the existence of its scalar waves. He claims the bump is a Longitudinal wave that tunnels through and across the earth the classical Maxwell's equations cannot be described is [3]. It should be said that the bump has been around for many years excellent over the classical Maxwell's equations can be described. Meyl is right that the Bump in fact - besides the usually dominant one Transverse Component - a longitudinal field component having. However, both field components result in completely natural from the solution of the classic Maxwell's equations. To a good approximation applies to harmonic Time dependency [7]
where the relative dielectric constant of the ground,
is its conductivity and the free space wavelength. About these
Relationship can be the material properties of the soil
from a measurement of the longitudinal and transverse components
the electric field strength can be determined.
In the beginning broadcast technology this was done very extensively, a comprehensive mapping of these material properties and, based on this, a reliable one Supply planning for the broadcasting services in the To be able to make long, medium and shortwave bands. Of course, the material properties of the soil can also be determined with other methods, and the Agreement with the results obtained therefrom thus an excellent confirmation of the theoretical description the ground wave propagation based on the classic Maxwell's equations. The theoretical treatment wave propagation is relatively complex [8]. Therefore the theory and corresponding measurements were made Propagation curves determined, which in graphic form the Drop in electric field strength over the distance between Describe the transmitter and receiver along the surface of the earth [9]. Another statement from Meyl is that it is completely nonsensical would be to assume that the bump spreads along the curved one Earth's surface from [3]. It should be said that the classical Maxwellian theory is a bit too complex after all, in order to make them understandable and intuitive for the layman Describe thought experiments. The classic field description allows waves to propagate along the curved surface of the earth, and the time lag of the wave on the recipient is of course the same as the one due to the propagation speed of the wave and the distance along the curved surface. Recently it is planned to provide digital broadcasting in the To operate long, medium and shortwave bands where the signal propagation times between different transmitters and receivers are vital. Planning this Systems is based on the classical theory, and the first pilot projects have already been successfully operated.
8. Summary A critical look at that of Konstantin Meyl, above all through his books [1, 2] but also through many lectures (e.g. [3]), widespread theories, shows very quickly that these are numerous Show contradictions as soon as they leave the foundation of classical physical

theories. Meyl's statements are often very difficult to grasp because they

only contain hints. However, Meyl also raises in particular in the Books [1, 2] claim to be mathematically correct demonstrations to deliver. These are usually incorrect and contradictory. Both its longitudinal or electromagnetic also lack scalar waves and its potential vortex any mathematical / physical basis. Lots of physical Phenomena such as the electromagnetic phenomenon Bump propagation, which according to Meyl supposedly still requiring explanation have been under the for many years classical physical theories excellently describable.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKTkpC-DHZ8&list=PLwORZIjZSh6_Qq965PprCbY_2nygcWRG_ 

So He says in the interview that Maxwell's Potential energy was set to zero and in engineering the potential energy is just discounted as lost heat dissipated. He says that in fact it's from the scalar vortex from the opposite phase.

 According to Dr. Prof. Konstantin Meyl, the DNA generates a scalar wave (longitudinal wave) that propagates in the directions of the magnetic field vector.

So I actually quote the quantum physicist who corroborates this claim about Maxwell and states that in fact it's referring to Spin energy. That Heaviside and Hertz changed what Maxwell was referring to and so the quantum potential as spin energy was lost. Meyl says Tesla used electric scalar waves while Meyl uses magnetic scalar waves....

So he doesn't use quantum physics and tries to just disregard it.

He tries to use the Golden Ratio instead when in fact any scalar waves are from noncommutative phase logic which is what quantum mechanics is based on.

Professor Konstantin Meyl has a background in electrical engineering and field physics. His extensive knowledge of Eddy Currents made him wonder about vortices in electromagnetic theory, and specifically with regard to Tesla's work. 

Dr. Meyl discovered a fundamental mistake in Maxwell's Equations.

 So the problem with Meyl and Dollard is they don't understand noncommutative phase logic.

My quantum mechanics professor Herbert J. Bernstein emphasized this point - he said scientists are brainwashed by studying classical physics first when in fact the foundation of science is now based on quantum mechanics noncommutative phase logic.

At the same time, Davydov discovered the related principle of longitudinal wave forms called solitons. Solitons with discrete wave frequencies can induce direct changes in DNA/RNA conformation and/or epigenetic changes, in addition to perturbation of protein folding and disturbance of intra and intercellular wave communication that is essential for the health ecology of cells.It is further hypothesized that such wave energies and eigen-frequencies can be optimally expressed by a toroidal geometry.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316058728_Cancer_is_promoted_by_cellular_states_of_electromagnetic_decoherence_and_can_be_corrected_by_exposure_to_coherent_non-ionizing_electromagnetic_fields_A_physical_model_about_cell-sustaining_and_cell-de/link/58ee5f90a6fdcc61cc1259b1/download

the longitudinal wave has no constant speed...

says Meyl.

So he's really talking about the pulsation phase speed....

resonance is occurring if we have the same frequency, if we have the opposite phase angle between transmitter and receiver and if we have the same modulation, meaning the same form of the curve. So these three conditions are necessary to bring both the transmitter and receiver into resonance.
Meyl.



No comments:

Post a Comment