The book describes the conceptual development of analysis from antiquity up to the end of the nineteenth century. Intra-theoretical processes are considered as well as the influence of applied problems and biographical and philosophical backgrounds. ... Google Books
Notice this is taking the Pythagorean Tetraktys to assume to refer to the concept of irrational magnitude of ratios as fractions!
A History of Analysis - Page 5 - Google Books Result
Hans Niels Jahnke - MathematicsHans Niels Jahnke ... The notion of compound ratio refers to the Pythagorean theory of music, one of the branches of the quadrivium and later part of the liberal...
So the fact that the Perfect Fourth PLUS the PErfect Fifth = the Octave from multiplying 4/3 x 3/2 = 2 already assumes that the Perfect Fourth is derived from the irrational magnitude of a HIDDEN and DIFFERENT value of the root tonic of "1" - the unit of the sound is thus taken to be arbitrary (with zero).
In other words it's only the interval as the dynamic relation of the ratios that matter with the assumption of the sound as a contained geometric materialism with symmetric inversion of the fractions.
this excerpt here on Pythagorean music
so the frequencies and intervals are different than pitches in relation to the root tonic. So that 2/3 as the Perfect Fifth is the pitch of F to C but is a Perfect Fifth INTERVAL while 4/3 is the pitch of C to F but the interval is the Perfect Fourth.
So the DISTANCE as geometry (one unit in either direction) is the INTERVAL while the PITCH is the geometric length - with a different root tonic value. So just as Professors Hugly and Sayward argued - there is a difference between analytic geometry of arithmetic distance as INTERVAL instead of PITCH as geometric length.
So then he conflates the ratios of 2:3 and 3:4 as being the SAME as 3:2 and 4:3 when in fact their PITCH is NOT the same!!
This is what I expose as the "bait and switch" at the origin of Western science - using music theory as the "vanishing mediator" that covers up the empirical truth of noncommutative phase of the PErfect Fifth and Perfect Fourth to the Octave and root tonic. pdf on Erasmus 1500 music theory
Why do you think Kepler was against the closed form solution of the Golden Ratio? Because he understood the iterations as male and female numbers with infinity not contained by geometric symmetry. Therefore the ratio can not simply just be inverted for the zero answer - hence chaos.
Zero comments? It's been proven Newton got his inverse square law from Pythagorean science (actually from Archytas). Zero, as negative infinity, was opposed by Aristotle.
Professor Vaughen: Thank you for responding! When you say "evolve" are you referring to conservation biologist Michael Soule pointing out that evolution for large mammals ended on Earth in the 1970s due to lack of habitat (and therefore your focus on outer space)? Or is your use of the word "evolution" more in line with Cambridge University Press having a book titled, "The Evolution of Technology." Surely you realize we are currently in the 7th mass extinction crisis on Earth - and this one caused entirely by modern human technology based on what math professor Luigi Borzacchini calls a "deep pre-established disharmony." So to claim it doesn't matter particularly - Borzacchini was referring to the secret music theory origin of Western math, a cover-up that he published as "really astonishing" and "shocking." For example: consider this book A History of Analysis by Hans Niels Jahnke - Mathematics
Hans Niels Jahnke ... The notion of compound ratio refers to the Pythagorean theory of music, one of the branches of the quadrivium and later part of the liberal ...
Notice this is taking the Pythagorean Tetraktys to assume to refer to the concept of irrational magnitude of ratios as fractions!
So the fact that the Perfect Fourth PLUS the PErfect Fifth = the Octave from multiplying 4/3 x 3/2 = 2 already assumes that the Perfect Fourth is derived from the irrational magnitude of a HIDDEN and DIFFERENT value of the root tonic of "1" - the unit of the sound is thus taken to be arbitrary (with zero).
In other words it's only the interval as the dynamic relation of the ratios that matter with the assumption of the sound as a contained geometric materialism with symmetric inversion of the fractions.
this excerpt here on Pythagorean music
so the frequencies and intervals are different than pitches in relation to the root tonic. So that 2/3 as the Perfect Fifth is the pitch of F to C but is a Perfect Fifth INTERVAL while 4/3 is the pitch of C to F but the interval is the Perfect Fourth.
So the DISTANCE as geometry (one unit in either direction) is the INTERVAL while the PITCH is the geometric length - with a different root tonic value. So just as Professors Hugly and Sayward argued - there is a difference between analytic geometry of arithmetic distance as INTERVAL instead of PITCH as geometric length.
So then he conflates the ratios of 2:3 and 3:4 as being the SAME as 3:2 and 4:3 when in fact their PITCH is NOT the same!!
No comments:
Post a Comment