But getting an M.D. is a lot easier than doing the research for a Ph.D. and M.D.s make a lot more money from Big Pharma, etc. Hence all these superficial surgeries and "special needs." The fertilized egg stays in the fallopian tube for 3 or 4 days before it heads to the uterus. There it attaches to the lining and continues to grow until a baby is born. yep - it's called the Womb-Tomb for a reason. Pregnancy is very dangerous for real females. In contrast the job of real males is to heal the females. Nature is inherently female - this is what we learn from Oxytocin receptor love. Males need to train to have right side vagus nerve orgasms, just as females have. https://archive.org/stream/TheOriginsOfYogaAndTantraGeoffreySamuel/The%20Origins%20of%20Yoga%20and%20Tantra%20-%20Geoffrey%20Samuel_djvu.txt
As for the posture of the figure on this and similar
A For early Siva iconography, sec N. Joshi 1984 and Srinivasan 1984.
5 For further in rerp relation^ see Dhyansky 1987: 90-1
4 Origins of yoga and Tatum
Figure 1. 1. Proto-Siva' Seal (M-304)
seals, for Van Dhyansky (1987: 94—9) and Thomas McEviliev (2002: 104),
it is clearly the yogic posture mulabandbasana , and has to be understood in
terms of proto-Tantric techniques aimed at driving ‘the sperm-marrow-soul
fluid up the spinal channel’ (McEviliev 2002: no; cf Dhyansky 1987: 100).
Sullivan notes that the posture ‘seems to us a natural enough one and need
Our "2nd brain" is our gut - way more neurons than the heart. But the gut is mainly serotonin - and so dopamine is inverse to serotonin. So for a male to lust - this triggers the prostate to release lecithin as the "cum" or semen - that trigger is fired by the sympathetic nervous system connection from the pineal gland down to the kidneys - the adrenal medullae - and then to the prostate. Then with increased desire the erection happens from the parasympathetic nervous system - and this retracts the testes to pull the sperm out. But the ejaculation itself is a massive switch from the parasympathetic to the sympathetic nervous system that then spikes cortisol levels. This does NOT happen for females - the female orgasm stays in the parasympathetic nervous system.
So the MORE female orgasms that happen then the right side vagus nerve gets ionized and the lower body serotonin is able to bypass the blood brain barrier via the pineal gland blood into cerebrospinal fluid. the enteric cells mediate the serotonin via the vagus nerve - this is also what causes people to crap shit out. So the blood brain barrier is based on the Ohm resistance level and so as the vagus nerve gets ionized through increased piezoelectric force (pressure of the collagen) from trance dancing - then the right side vagus nerve opens up the connection to the pineal gland. So you then fill the brain with serotonin and this in turn increases the oxytocin levels as the right side vagus nerve goes to the right side of the heart. So then all that lecithin from male celibacy then myelinates the neurons to hold the "charge" from the vagus nerve and also the biophoton energy. The spirit biophoton energy is a laser energy that coordinates all this energy exchange. here
Third, blood-brain barrier permeability could be more permissive in females than males,72 enabling systemic oxytocin to have more access to the female central nervous system.
So the typical modern male is literally ejaculating his brains out when he loses all that lecithin. In the nonwestern spiritual cultures - this lecithin is known as N/om (snake energy) or kundalini or ambrosia or Ion (western asia- Pythagorean). So the pineal gland itself is an electrogravitic transducer - of lunar-solar forces. We modern huamns are cut off from the fact the Mother Nature is controlled by the lunar cycles via the pineal gland - that's what is really means to be a female. Most of Nature reproduces through parthenogenesis - no need for the male. But to be a real female mammal is an entirely different thing all together then some cheap M.D. procedure as a late capitalist commodity fetish. (my earlier blog post on this subject)
"Oxytocin is produced in pregnancy, levels increase significantly during active labor and childbirth, and both mom and baby produce oxytocin after birth and as long as baby breastfeeds. Oxytocin evokes feelings of contentment, trust, empathy, calmness and security and reduces anxiety and fear."
this is why real females have WAY more oxytocin neuron receptors than males.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1089/gg.2017.0017
Sex-Specific Differences in Oxytocin Receptor Expression and Function for Parental Behavior
https://doi.org/10.1089/gg.2017.0017
"should" is a logical error. The issue here is that Western civilization has wiped out Nature - and it's a proven fact that female mammals in Nature are based on oxytocin neuron receptors that DO NOT EXIST IN MALES. PERIOD. It has nothing to do with "should" and everything to do with Western civilization completely wiping out Nature due to not understanding nor respecting real female mammalian love bonding.
For example - medical doctors tell mothers to "let the baby cry it out" - this is literally torture that is then hard-wired into the baby's brain. I corresponded with the clinical psychologist who took the cortisol levels of babies "left to cry it out" - and their dopamine neuron receptors are permanently damaged as PTSD.
So PTSD is much more common than we realize. Now in the original human culture - the babies are breast-fed until 2 years old!! How many modern scientitific Westernized cultures do that? Yet it is proven that a REAL FEMALE has her oxytocin levels increase during pregnancy - and then spiking at giving birth - and while breast feeding - because JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER FEMALE MAMMAL - the oxytocin is the love bonding between the female and the baby mammal.
So whether "trans people SHOULD exist" is a moot question. They DON'T exist because there's no high-tech Westernized surgeries based on scientific technological lies about ecology that can CREATE female mammals.
Wow
- that's some creepy stuff. I had NO idea that "climate change" was a
right-wing meme but I'm not surprised. Thanks - I'm gonna post that over
on Black Bear News - where I discuss all things "abrupt global
warming."
The denial about this stuff is deep.
For example consider the promotion of "Trans" rights - I just posted research on my blog. Female mammals have way more oxytocin receptors than male mammals - that's what induces female bonding with the baby. It's hard-wired physiology! But no - instead the debate is whether Trans people "should" exist - because everyone knows Nature can just be engineered by your local M.D. or whatever. haha. Meanwhile we are completely wiping out Nature in the real world.
Behaviorally, male and female mice began expressing parental behavior similarly after cohousing with experienced females; however, oxytocin enhanced parental behavior onset in females but not males.
We showed that both endogenous oxytocin (released optogenetically) and exogenous oxytocin (either injected systemically or directly infused into left auditory cortex) could enable the initial expression of pup retrieval behavior.
For example, pair bonding in adult voles displays a similar sex-specific enhancement by oxytocin supplements. Exogenous oxytocin was found to increase pair bonding in females but had little effect in males, which might instead be regulated by vasopressin.69
Finally, left-lateralized oxytocin receptor expression in female auditory cortex is reminiscent of some features of human speech and language representation.68,77,78 Understanding the mechanisms and consequences of asymmetrical cortical pup call processing might therefore provide some information about the biological basis of human language abilities.
"should" is a logical error. The issue here is that Western civilization has wiped out Nature - and it's a proven fact that female mammals in Nature are based on oxytocin neuron receptors that DO NOT EXIST IN MALES. PERIOD. It has nothing to do with "should" and everything to do with Western civilization completely wiping out Nature due to not understanding nor respecting real female mammalian love bonding.
I think our ecology is a little messed up these days. Too many hormones and endocrine disrupting chemicals in our water. I think we should focus on the root causes of things such as, how the hell do we get these pollutants out of our environment? Focusing on whether or not Trans people should exist is kind of a silly side note, in my opinion.
For example - medical doctors tell mothers to "let the baby cry it out" - this is literally torture that is then hard-wired into the baby's brain. I corresponded with the clinical psychologist who took the cortisol levels of babies "left to cry it out" - and their dopamine neuron receptors are permanently damaged as PTSD.
So PTSD is much more common than we realize. Now in the original human culture - the babies are breast-fed until 2 years old!! How many modern scientitific Westernized cultures do that? Yet it is proven that a REAL FEMALE has her oxytocin levels increase during pregnancy - and then spiking at giving birth - and while breast feeding - because JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER FEMALE MAMMAL - the oxytocin is the love bonding between the female and the baby mammal.
So whether "trans people SHOULD exist" is a moot question. They DON'T exist because there's no high-tech Westernized surgeries based on scientific technological lies about ecology that can CREATE female mammals.
15 hours ago, ralis said:
The denial about this stuff is deep.
For example consider the promotion of "Trans" rights - I just posted research on my blog. Female mammals have way more oxytocin receptors than male mammals - that's what induces female bonding with the baby. It's hard-wired physiology! But no - instead the debate is whether Trans people "should" exist - because everyone knows Nature can just be engineered by your local M.D. or whatever. haha. Meanwhile we are completely wiping out Nature in the real world.
Quote
Now
ask yourself - what's in the news more - FAKE TRans "human rights"?
Or... the above - the wiping out of real female mammaling bonding in
Nature? I think you know the answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment