The Quantum Potential Energy as inherent nonlocal energy: Secret of the Ouroborus and music harmonics

So the energy is not localized at the particle. In fact the particle energy is less than it would be if you tried to measure it without the entanglement....The energy is in the curvature of space and not in the flat region.

This is the secret of the relativistic quantum potential of David Bohm and Basil Hiley's model of reality. Hiley interview vid (part 5) on youtube

I corresponded with Professor Hiley a bit - and so...

 At zero time there is noncommutative phase of time-frequency energy as nonlocality or the quantum potential information field - the 5th dimension as relativistic quantum noncommutative phase. That is the secret of the Ouroborus.

 Quantum professor Basil J. Hiley, 2016: "Quantum Trajectories: Dirac, Moyal and Bohm"

 In many ways it seemed to be a new form of inner energy possessed by the particle, organising the flow lines in a novel way and suggesting a 'formative' cause rather than the traditional efficient cause.

....quantum phenomena emerged from a non-commutative phase space.

https://roelhollander.eu/en/blog-music/zodiac-signs-and-tonality/

So this is a great overview tracing the Ouroborus to music harmonics as the Zodiac. But with Professor Basil Hiley and Bohm we entered into relativistic quantum science as the true noncommutative phase origin of the Cosmos. It is not something we can visualize but we can logically infer.

So as Hiley (part 6) emphasizes if you change the order of measurement then it changes the energy momentum. Reality is inherently interactive. What the Bohm model shows is that this is not because of the measurement itself - it is inherently nonlocal, already there, due to the spin or angular momentum. Hiley says that Bohm first got his implicate order from the noncommutative math.

 Bohm's Approach and Individuality, 2016, Oxford University Press: Basil J. Hiley:

 "There we see that if one of the particles enters the field of a Stern-Gerlach magnet, it is then deflected either "up" or "down" depending on the positions of each particle at the time just before the particle enters the magnetic field. The particle in this field has its trajectory changed, while the other particle continues in a straight line. At the same time both spin components become well defined. This is a surprising result, but clearly shows that the individual parts cannot be thought of as isolated "little spinning spheres," a point that was emphasized by Weyl (1931)."

http://ecoechoinvasives.blogspot.com/2018/02/12-spin-virtual-phonon-noncommutative.html

So I blogged on this before - the spin 1/2 couples to the magnetic field but not the electric field - and so the spin 1/2 stores long term information as a magnetic black hole of the 5th dimension - the Soul.

And then it is Field Medal professor Alain Connes who describes this as music theory. This is what I intuited in high school but I kept it to myself - well I shared the intuition with my piano teacher. They got me books on the intuition process behind music composition and science - a book called "The Creative Process" - and a book called "Talks with Great Composers" - although this 2nd book was shown to not be accurate on some levels.

So in this part 5, Professor Hiley is emphasizing that nonlocality is the pre-emptive foundation of reality. Normally quantum mechanics teaches you have to set up quantum entanglement to achieve nonlocality. What Professor Hiley is stating is that - it is in the Schroedinger equation - the quantum potential is not the same as kinetic energy nor classical potential energy - but rather the quantum potential is a field that has its own energy that is nonlocal.

And the famous Bell's Inequality was because of Bohm and Hiley already doing the experiments showing nonlocality - and so because of Bohm's model, then Bell devised his Inequality experiment, that proved that locality is violated.

And so Professor Hiley says -

"why has this quantum potential been rejected? Because it's strange, Sure it's strange. Quantum mechanics is strange! ...The energy is not localized at the particle....This common energy...this energy is nonlocal. Here we go. People don't like having nonlocal."

So then Professor Hiley says this is just starting to be recognized by science. He's talking about EPR=ER. But Hiley is saying you don't even need a particle - this nonlocal field is primary. Fascinating questions

There's no difference between physics and biology. Fundamentally. And then you can even be outrageous, well then maybe even the electron has a proto-consciousness. There's a thought!

Professor Basil J. Hiley

Whether other physicists agree with this or not, they don't talk about it, so I think they don't agree. Even though they want to put information in.... It might have a proto-consciousness. I don't know if you want to call it that.

 Not only does energy push and pull things but it's also a more subtle energy that guides things.

I've got the Bohm model which a lot of physicists refuse to talk about. Don't ask me why? When I explain to mathematicians and show the mathematician and they say, "What's the problem, that's what we do everyday?"...  

 Jack Sarfatti claiming he can hack the Chinese quantum teleportation satellites using the Bohm-Hiley "updated" retrocausal model - talk

Jack Sarfatti

The debate over the meaning and completeness of quantum mechanics between Einstein and Bohr has never been settled. David Kaiser describes it in his book "How the Hippies Saved Physics." I will describe some extraordinary recent papers by Huw Price, Roderick Sutherland and others that make David Bohm's 1952 pilot wave "hidden variable theory" completely relativistic replacing nonlocality with local retrocausality especially for complex many-particle entangled systems. The need for configuration space is eliminated by Costa de Beauregard's "zig-zag" used by John Cramer and Yakir Aharonov, and this permits quantum gravity to be reformulated in a simple way. Even more important is that Sutherland's use of the Feynman-Schwinger action principle in Bohm's picture shows how statistical linear unitary quantum mechanics is a limiting case of a deeper non-statistical nonlinear non-unitary post-quantum mechanics. Indeed, the latter's relation to the former is identical to the relation of general relativity to special relativity - both generalized theories use Einstein's action-reaction as the common organizing idea. God does not play dice with the universe in the new post-quantum mechanics.  

 However, this does not mean that Nature does not allow locally decodable keyless entanglement signaling. In fact Nature does allow it in living matter as seen in brain presponse and the SRI CIA precognition data et-al. It just means, as Einstein thought, that quantum mechanics is incomplete and that God does not play dice with the universe.

I've corresponded with Dr. Sarfatti also.



 “Suppose there is even something vaguely teleological about the effects of consciousness, so that a future impression might affect a past action.” Roger Penrose, “The Emperor’s New Mind” pp 442-445 (1989)

In Penrose's theory it is the back-reaction of the classical gravity field beable on the electron beables inside the protein dimers etc. that in turn causes a change in the wave function of those electrons et-al that is the quale. Therefore, the wave function is an intrinsic mental field in order for Penrose's scheme to make any sense at all. Same for Henry Stapp's and Wigner's consciousness as collapse - the thing that collapses must be intrinsically thought like.

“It seems to me that biological systems are able in some way to utilize the opposite time-sense in which radiation propagates from future to past. Bizarre as this may appear, they must somehow be working backwards in time.” Sir Fred Hoyle, “The Intelligent Universe”, p. 213 (1986)
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79-00999a000200010077-1

Fascinating paper by Jack Sarfatti for the CIA Stargate program!!