Monday, February 28, 2022

The Lunar Calendar effect in the science is measuring the rate of abrupt global warming: my response to Dr. Jim Massa, oceanographer

  11:50 Brad opens a book to find a Bushman woman doctor's testimony 12:58 Hillary reads Lesua's testimony of her grandmother and receiving God's water 22:49 Too Many Mornings (Brad sings of holy water with the help of Sondheim)

The Keeney's report Holy N/om water appearing just over a sacred turtle shell bowl - and collected as N/om healing energy water!! 

The Arctic is warming four times faster than the rest of the world by faster | Dec 14, 2021 | Blog DATE: December 14, 2021 SOURCE: Science It’s almost a mantra in climate science: The Arctic is warming twice as fast as the rest of the world. But that figure, found in scientific studies, advocacy reports, the popular press, and even the 2021 U.N. climate assessment, is incorrect, obscuring the true toll of global warming on the north, a team of climate scientists reports this week. In fact, the researchers say, the Arctic is warming four times faster than the global average. “Everybody knows [the Arctic] is a canary when it comes to climate change,” says Peter Jacobs, a climate scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, who presented the work on 13 December at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union. “Yet we’re misreporting it by a factor of two. Which is just bananas.”

Science Talk with Jim Massa
Voidisyinyang Voidisyinyang As you know, I discuss frequently, the arctic sea ice. I continually stress that the volume/thickness/multi year ice is drastically declining. Plus, the videos I did explaining the role of the ocean heat content as warmer waters move into the arctic ocean via both Bering and Fram Straits melts the ice, prevents the ice from forming, creates a longer/increasing open water yearly time period so that more heat energy is absorbed all which results in less and less ice, reduced extent, reduced thickness. Interesting point here. When you hear the arctic is warming twice, three times as fast, these findings are based on examining data from 60 degrees north latitude to the pole. When the same data is analyzed from the arctic circle to the pole (about 66 degrees north latitude), the arctic is warming 4x, even 5x times faster than the rest of the world. I prefer using the 60 latitude as the benchmark for this simple reason. The latitude of the arctic circle is not static. It is constantly changing depending on the the tilt of the axis, where in the Milankovitch cycles the planet is in and so on. So, from a let's be consistent in our methodology aspect, I prefer the use of 60 north. Having said that, the result using this benchmark indicates at least three times as fast. Just something to consider. 
My response:

 "Given the Moon’s role in the patterning of insolation at Milankovitch
scales, the potential of the Moon to fulfil such a role in a combination of periodicities at millennial-
scale should not be surprising (Section 5.3). On evidence presented here, the Moon is a key player in
the SdV cycle and 133-yr cycles (Sections 7.2.2 and 7.2.3). These two cycles interact to shape TOA
solar irradiance patterns at the scale of the Bond ‘cycle’ (Chapter 6 and Section 7.2.5). Additionally,
the Moon’s gravitational influence and interaction with the perihelion also produce millennial-scale
patterns in this range that can account for the occurrence of the Bond ‘cycle’, which is a climate‘pulse’ that underlies Heinrich and Dansgaard-Oeschger events (Section 7.2.5)"

"In terms of gravitation, it is clear that lunar gravitation causes IRD events, with the size of these events dependent on ice volume, and the magnitude of gravitation (Chapter 5). 
 The icebergs contained rock mass, eroded by the glaciers, and as they melted, this material was dropped to the sea floor as ice rafted debris (abbreviated to "IRD") forming deposits called Heinrich layers.

The icebergs' melting caused vast quantities of fresh water to be added to the North Atlantic. Such inputs of cold and fresh water may well have altered the density-driven, thermohaline circulation patterns of the ocean, and often coincide with indications of global climate fluctuations.

These events are also accompanied by fluctuations in insolation that cause extreme weather events in sensitive geographic regions, such as the Arctic and Antarctic Circles and the WPWP. These locations are linked by geographic longitude, being either of similar longitude or positioned 180° opposite."
 
from "Astronomical Forcing of Sub-Milankovitch Climate Oscillations during the Late Quaternary"
 
‘Tug of war’ between Earth, Moon and Sun could be driving tectonic plate movements
 
Over time, the position of the barycenter—the center of mass between the orbiting bodies of the Earth and the moon—has moved closer to Earth’s surface and now oscillates 600 km per month relative to the geocenter, Hofmeister says. This sets up internal stresses, as the Earth continues to spin.
“Because the oscillating barycenter lies ~4,600 km from the geocenter, Earth’s tangential orbital acceleration and solar pull are imbalanced except at the barycenter,” Hofmeister says. “The planet’s warm, thick, and strong interior layers can withstand these stresses, but its thin, cold, brittle lithosphere responds by fracturing.”
 
Jim - my theory is that modern science is based on a symmetric spatial measurement of time using radians and angular frequency - from the solar calendar based farming. So original human culture was based on the lunar calendar as a psychic pineal gland energy that resonated directly with time defined as a 5th dimension that can not be seen - it is the noncommutative phase at the zero point of geometry. So it can only be observed as the inner cross products of the noncommutative matrices - found in relativistic quantum science. Fields Medal Math Professor Alain Connes did his Ph.D. thesis on this in 1974 - that the supposed "random" entropy of thermodynamics actually originates from the noncommutative phase that is modeled by the discrete spectrum of frequency (due to the noncommutative imaginary number creating a constant as the basis of Fourier time-frequency uncertainty). 
 
So therefore time is not an external parameter but rather time is an internal operator.
Since water is a macroquantum molecule - as Gerald of "EZ Water" fame - Pollack - debated with Guy McPherson - if we truly understand the water cycle on Earth we realize there is a "fourth" phase of water based on virtual photons as the negentropic nonlocal force driving life on Earth (a reverse time and negative frequency). This is a discrete time accessed through our original lunar calendar based on the 12 number system also found in music.
 
 
 @Voidisyinyang Voidisyinyang  what source are you referencing? Need to look at that and ponder...
 @Science Talk with Jim Massa  hahaha. The first long quote has the source after it as the title of the pdf - it's someone's Ph.D. thesis. The next part is just my own speculation. The source starts with JL Finney, "What's so special about water?" The EZ Water claim is that right before water freezes the density is greatest but the macroquantum negentropy is also greatest as the volume expands - and then when this is "in vivo" based on pressure instead of temperature - then the "EZ Water" research of Gerald Pollack shows a splitting of the protons and electrons via virtual photons created. Then Pollack says how cloud formation is also due to these virtual photons.... and since the Moon controls the water cycle on Earth - and humans secretly have their pineal gland cycles controlled by the moon (only we don't know this due to left brain dominance) - then the solar calendar based classical science of symmetric space for time measurements as the basis of logarithms and exponentials, etc. - created the abrupt global warming crisis by suppressing our natural synchronization with the lunar energy.

No comments:

Post a Comment