Why we don't exist in a supercomputer based on probabilities: Noncommutative logic inference and the Synchronicity model of Dr. Kirby Surprise

The environment reflects his thoughts

 You're seeing what you're looking for.

They are outside of time and space somewhat. They are NOT archetypes. There is no actual evidence anywhere that Jung's idea of universal archetypes exists: Except maybe in the abstraction of mathematics. And even that is questionable.

We exist in a range of moments, in a range of probabilities, all at the same time.

Dr. Kirby Surprise interview on Synchronicities

Dr. Surprise falls based on the "multiuniverse model" of reality without realizing that the probabilities, as quantum physicists now point out, actually are just for finding a particle, not for the reality that exists before the particle exists. Relativistic quantum physics has now proven that there is a mathematical model of reality that is before probabilities - this is the noncommutative phase logic.

Dr. Surprise defines the "environment" as some kind of abstract mental "system" without acknowledging that we are existing in an ecological and social justice crisis that is profoundly radical. So probabilities already assume a continuum of geometry as defined by irrational magnitude, logistic math. This is the mathematical assumption that Dr. Surprise is relying on. I will grant him the benefit of him graduating from a New Age college - "integral studies" - and so he most likely is completely unaware of noncommutative phase logic. It's not promoted in the New Age community as the "multiverse" model was. People "love" the multiverse model because it because says anything goes.
 

Aurobindo's ideas were further explored by Indra Sen (1903–1994) in the 1940s and 1950s, a psychologist, and devotee of Sri Aurobindo and The Mother. He was the first to coin the term "Integral psychology" to describe the psychological observations he found in Sri Aurobindo's writings (which he contrasted with those of Western Psychology), and developed themes of "Integral Culture" and "Integral Man".^[23]
These ideas were further developed by Haridas Chaudhuri (1913–1975), a Bengali philosopher and academic who founded in 1968 the California Institute of Integral Studies.^[24]

Dr. Surprise does say he believes in a "fundamental unity" but doesn't know anything more than that. The concept of a "unit" is again a Western mathematical bias that assumes symmetric logarithmic math. Plato argued for "two-ness" as the fundamental symmetric unit. I exposed Aurobindo's Ashram as part of the U.N. Actual Matrix Plan. Aurobindo received the Freemasonic worldview spirit of Vivekananda and then the Aurobindo Ashram published Professor Oliver L. Reiser's Theosophist think tank Actual Matrix Plan as radio-eugenics. I quoted Aurobindo stating the future human will be radioactive!

Quantum entanglement still works but the range is smaller.

 Again this logic that he is using assumes that probabilities are the foundation of analysis - which is thoroughly not true. I have detailed numerous relativistic quantum physicists doing lab research published in the top journals - using "weak measurements" - before any probabilities. They are called "quasi-probabilities" at best. But that still is just science, and does not include logical inference as meditation, which is entirely different than relying on external measurements. It's not based on a boundary condition as a "range" or parameter. It's not defined geometrically but rather through the logic of "pure time" as quantum physics professor Basil J. Hiley calls noncommutative phase logic, in honor of Hamilton.

Dr. Surprise says,

The most important of this is our relationship to other people.

So he's promoting the "transpersonal" woo-woo model of the Integral Studies school. No people exist in ecology. I critiqued Ken Wilber's "integral" model of reality in my master's thesis - I debunked his model as being racist and against ecology. For example the original human culture females would kill their new babies if they were still nursing a baby, which they did till 2 years old. This is how the original human culture made sure they respected Mother Nature as ecology. Only female humans, as primates, have their estrus cycle, menstruation, synchronized with the lunar cycle precisely, as females living a in group in Nature. So this is the most important aspect of what it means to be human and this connection is through the heart and pineal gland and the womb - the oxytocin love connection via melatonin levels.

I can see how Dr. Surprise has good intentions to help people and that's great. But I think the overall framework of the book is to maintain a "progressive liberal" technocracy. The fact is that Westernized civilization is not "sustainable" and literally not sustainable in the immediate future of the next 5 to 10 years. It used to be normal for males to go off in solitude in Nature for long terms - a month every year - to do intense trance dance training as noncommutative phase logic - complementary opposites as with Taiji.

We don't have the math for it.

Yes we do have the math for it! I would contact Dr. Surprise but I honestly think he is controlled by his worldview. I will suggest to him to consider noncommutative phase math but I am not sure he is able to get beyond his "myth" as he calls it.

He thinks "technological possibilites" are making progress in recognizing people as people. haha. Good luck with that.

There is no math of the transition.

Yes there is!

Oh the book was published by Samuel Weiser! No wonder. I received a reply from Weiser in 1996 - saying my analysis was too academic. haha. The problem with Samuel Weiser is they are too Westernized and so not ready yet to consider deeper analysis. You have to really search deeply into science to find the answer.

Here is his book Synchronicites - he says he lists 200 books at the end

The brain is NOT a "computational system" as Sir Roger Penrose has proven.

This dude's worldview is deeply troubling - he says "don't be afraid" that the brain is a "computational system." - sorry - no need to be condescending that disagreeing with you is just an "emotional" reaction!

Two trillion galaxies! Wow - that in no way "saves" the ecological crisis.

He said he had 200 books listed - but his Bibliography is only 20 books! Maybe I heard him wrong?

31 different authors - and why does he rely on "Theosophy" so much when it was blatantly racist? Jung also had troubling ties to the Nazis - so not the best "lineage" to embrace. Joseph Campbell was a eugencist racist also.

Serendipity, Synchronicity, Coincidence - Joseph Campbell Foundation

https://www.jcf.org › ... › The Wisdom Pool: The Associates Research Dialogue

Feb 23, 2007 - Can anyone describe a difference between serendipitous occurrences, incidences of synchronicity, and coincidence? Is there a discernible ..