A daobums poster asks:
Is there a tie-in with spirituality?
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9789813232044_0001 NEW PAPER by KAUFFMANThe simplest discrete system corresponds directly to
the square root of minus one, when the square root of
minus one is seen as an oscillation between plus and
minus one. This way thinking about the square root
of minus one as an iterant is explained below. More
generally, by starting with a discrete time series of
positions, one has immediately a non-commutativity
of observations and this non-commutativi ty can be
encapsulated in an iterant algebra as defined in Sec-
tion 2 of the present paper.
All of this points out how the complex numbers, as
we have previously examined them, live naturally in
the context of the non-commutative algebras of iterants and matrices.
I corresponded with Math professor Louis Kauffman recently about complex numbers. There was an electrical engineering paper out of China that tried to dismiss Kauffman by claiming you do not need noncommutative math to explain complex numbers. http://ecoechoinvasives.blogspot.com/2018/01/rukhsan-ul-haq-wani-and-time-of-reality.html
My claim, and original idea, has been that this is circumnavigating a T'ai Chi (Yin/Yang) symbol! More recently (Oshins, 1993b) I have suggested that this proximate technique can be used to realize Wing Chun kung-fu's "bong sau/tan sau" movement [youtube] out of the Kauffman/Oshins "quaternionic arm" discussed and referenced below in end note 5.
He said he would respond. This is his latest paper. Kauffman was a colleague of Eddie Oshins at SLAC - Stanford Linear Accelerator Center - where Oshins realized that noncommutative quantum logic is the secret of Daoist Neigong training. http://ecoechoinvasives.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-physics-of-tao-eddie-oshins-cracked.html
Kauffman 2011These Majorana Fermions can be symbolized by Clif-
ford algebra generators a and b such that a [squared]
= b[squared]= 1
and ab = −ba. One can take a as the iterant corre-
sponding to a period two oscillation, and b as the
time shifting operator. Then their product ab is a
square root of minus one in a non-commutative con-
text.
http://ecoechoinvasives.blogspot.com/2018/01/lawrnence-domash-former-professor-where.htmlIn this sense the square root of minus one is a clock and/or a clock/observer.
and then a collaborator of Kauffman gives us more details:...superconductivity within one neuron could become phase coherent with that in an adjoining cell by virtue of quantum tunnelling, and this could be stimulated by the macroscopic analog of stimulated emission (alluded to before in connection with the mantra), that is an AC Josephson effect. ...At a more interesting level, the quantum vacuum state may be said to be empty (of excitation) and yet full in the sense of pure potentiality; it contains "virtual" (unphysical) representatives of all possible modes of matter and excitation in the form of vacuum fluctuations or "virtual particles" (zero-point excitations of each field mode, assigned one-half quanta of energy, due directly to the non-commutative property of the field operators).
imaginary number x Planck's Constant as h-bar [ h divided by 2π,]....a comparable commutator between energy [frequency] and time... [change in]energy x [change in]time = 1/2 h-bar [half of the quantum phase space is quantum spin, which cannot be put in a Poisson bracket].
A Proof for Poisson Bracket in Non-commutative Algebra of Quantum Mechanics by Sina Khorasani, University of Vienna, 2014 pdf
noncommutative math as the T'ai Chi secret of Neigong
How can we tie this back to music theory and Professor Connes 2, 3, infinity music theory noncommutative model?
When 2/3 is "negative" frequency and 3/2 is "positive frequency" - then the 3 is the new "root tonic" as the "negative one" - since it has to be the new "one" - to double back as 4/3 for C to F harmonic, as the PErfect Fourth.
In other words by covering up the noncommutative music - the "one" had CHANGED to negative one as a time change - but this was covered up.
The OP continually refers to me in the third person despite my direct engagement with his "complex numbers" attempt to connect to Daoism. He says he can "prove" that complex numbers are commutative and not non-commutative. This is very funny because in the post I made in this thread - the first post - this is now my third post - the first post I made I stated how I had corresponded with math professor Louis Kauffman about how a couple Chinese electrical engineers were claiming in a paper that complex numbers are not based on non-commutative logic. Professor Kauffman has made a career out of emphasizing that noncommutative logic source of complex numbers - so their paper was directed at his claim. He responded to me that he had not seen that paper and so he would respond. Then I posted his latest research paper which is his response - in that paper he demonstrates that complex numbers are derived from noncommutative logic.
Now the connection to Daoism is that I had corresponded with math professor Kauffman before about his collaboration with Eddie Oshins, the founder of quantum psychology at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Both Kauffman and Oshins worked at SLAC together. Oshins also taught Wing Chun martial arts and he realized that the secret of Daoist neigong was the same noncommutative logic of quantum physics based on complex numbers.
So you can study Eddie Oshins articles for more details. For example Oshins also worked with Karl Pribram on Pribram's "holographic mind" model of neuroscience. But Pribram could not understand the noncommutative logic of quantum physics. So Pribram continues to make the mistake of promoting a symmetric math logic based on Fourier analysis. Oshins pointed out Pribram's error but instead Pribram just had his ideas promoted in the New Age scene - especially Michael Talbot's book The Holographic Universe. So qigong master Chunyi Lin said he read that book, "The Holographic Universe" and says yes it is an accurate portrayal of what reality is for qigong masters.
So then the other scientist featured in that book the Holographic Universe is David Bohm. I have also corresponded with quantum physics professor Basil J. Hiley who collaborated with David Bohm. Bohm had expanded on de Broglie's first critique of relativity, in the foundation of quantum physics. Schroedinger's wave equation is based on de Broglie but Schroedinger took out the relativity foundation and so the noncommutative logic was lost. Instead it became the "measurement problem" as Schroedinger's Cat. But the new "weak measurements" analysis of the double slit experiment has proven once again that the noncommutative logic is the foundation of reality, and so corroborates Daoism as well.
Eddie Oshins was pissed that the woo-woo New Age science scene promoted the wrong logic for the Holographic Model as quantum consciousness and he died early - but his legacy lives on. Here is math professor Louis Kauffman newly demonstrated a math move of complex numbers as noncommutative logic - based on his work with Eddie Oshins.
The "Quaternion Handshake" illustrates the fundamental orientation-entanglement relation that interlocks the structure of the quaternions with the geometry and topology of an object connected to a background in three dimensional space. In this case the objects are human hands, the background is the body and the connection is the arm that links hand to body. ...
Starring:
Martial Arts By: Louis Kauffman
John Hart
Eddie Oshins
Starring:
Martial Arts By: Louis Kauffman
John Hart
Eddie Oshins
https://www.evl.uic.edu/hypercomplex/movies/handshake.mpg
http://www.quantumpsychology.com/
So if you study SLAC - these are real quantum physicists who acknowledge that quantum physics enables precognition and other paranormal abilities as well. They are high level scientists and yet the "general science" promoters as "skeptics" know nothing about noncommutative logic. It is quite funny.
I had to really dig to discover Eddie Oshins! I figured - I just read books on my own, despite my master's degree and so SOMEONE must have discovered this same secret besides me. Sure enough! Thank you Eddie Oshins.
Here is Oshins demonstrated the Complex Number noncommutative logic hand shake with another scientist at SLAC.
http://ecoechoinvasives.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-physics-of-tao-eddie-oshins-cracked.html
So I blogged on this - 1 year and 4 months ago.
So it is originally called the Dirac Dance. I learned this in my first year of college in my quantum mechanics class taught by Professor Herbert J. Bernstein. He is using noncommutative logic for NASA to test out his quantum teleportation signal system with satellites.
Soon after creating the binary number system (used in modern day computers), Leibniz found out about this ancient symbolism and attributed the origination of the binary numbers to the Chinese. In addition to their usage as oracles or as representations of patterns of Nature, these symbols were precursors to a school of health systems, mind exercises and martial arts known collectively as neigong/noi kung (the "inner" or "internal" school of "shaddow boxing"). The most well known of these esoteric skills are taijiquan/t'ai chi chuan ("grand pinnacle" boxing), hsing-i chuan ("form of mind/will/intent" boxing), and baquazhang/pa kua chang ("8 trigrams palm" [boxing]).In this talk, Eddie will give a short history of the above concepts and, in light of some work he has been developing in his Quantum Psychology Project®, he will propose a new reinterpretation of these symbols. He will demonstrate mathematical aspects, such as the consequent "orientation-entanglement relation" and the Kauffman-Oshins "quanternionic arm." Eddie will use these concepts to illustrate his notion of "self-referential motion," and relate such understanding to both gongfu (kung-fu) and psychology.
So it would have served no useful purpose to use Kauffman's approach here.
Unless you want to understand the connection of complex numbers to Daoism. This is a "Dao" website.
Symmetric logic is Western logic NOT Daoist logic. yeah noncommutative phase is not difficult to understand unless you've been brainwashed by WEstern symmetric logic since learning the square root of two. haha.
So a good overview of WEstern math is
I have corresponded with math professor Ian Stewart. He does NOT believe in natural telepathy whereas the SLAC noncommutative phase scientists DO believe in natural telepathy, as is the case with Daoism.Why Beauty Is Truth: The History of Symmetry Kindle Edition. At the heart of relativity theory, quantum mechanics, string theory, and much of modern cosmology lies one concept: symmetry. ... In Why Beauty Is Truth, world-famous mathematician Ian Stewart narrates the history of the emergence of this remarkable area of study ...
So to promote complex numbers as commutative logic is to do against Daoist philosophy.
To combine relativity with quantum physics requires noncommutative logic and so noncommutative logic is the foundation of reality - this is the point of math professor Louis Kauffman.
My quantum physics professor made the same point - people learn classical physics in high school whereas quantum physics is the foundation of reality now - and quantum physics is based on noncommutative phase logic. Paul Dirac realized this was the truth from studying the Heisenberg matrices.
Qigong study in China has realized there has to be a revolution in science that combines relativity with quantum physics. Qigong master Yan Xin calls it the "virtual information field" when he does his healing. This is why Westerners do not understand Daoism because all people learn is symmetric logic and so fail to consider the foundation of reality.
I am simply conveying what the SLAC scientists teach - Eddie Oshins directly realized that DAoist neigong training is due to noncommutative logic of complex numbers. I realized this on my own by studying music theory. Fields medal math professor Alain Connes has corroborated my research - that music theory is noncommutative and so explains relativistic quantum physics as the ether. Also quantum physics professor Basil J. Hiley argues that noncommutative phase logic is the foundation of reality as well - as a new causative self-force. Professor Shajn Majid is another example, as are Sir Roger Penrose and Dr. Stuart Hameroff.
So there is a whole discipline of science connecting consciousness, paranormal spiritual training and noncommutative phase logic of complex numbers. The OP wants to pretend this does not exist. haha. Daoism confirms the noncommutative phase logic.
Symmetric Western logic goes against Daoism.
No comments:
Post a Comment