Wednesday, May 9, 2018

Will Chiralized Carbon-Nanotubes "save" the Biosphere from Global warming meltdown: Revisiting the NanoPanel

Sandy - thanks for contacting me to listen to the vid - I liked your asides to the reading. In terms of abrupt global warming - the main issue is "entropy." So we know the amount of heat being released into the atmosphere by global warming is - how many "equivalents" of nuclear bombs a day? It is quite staggering. And so entropy as defined by standard physics assumes the Earth's natural radiation of heat back into the atmosphere - the infrared heat absorbed by CO2 - is actually an "increase" in entropy in comparison to the sunlight entering the atmosphere. Why? Because the energy is "red-shifted" to a lower frequency of energy from the cosmic rays - it is reflected by the earth, into a longer wavelength, than from what came in from the Sun directly. And then ironically it is considered that Civilization technology then converts the entropy of carbon-based energy into "work" which is against entropy. And so entropy is defined as the byproduct of useful energy as work, that is emitted as randomized information. But you can maybe notice that physics as industrial work is actually against ecology and in fact it is ecology that absorbs the infrared heat and enables life on Earth - the plants and bacteria absorbing the CO2 and emitting oxygen, and then animals and fungus in reverse. So then we say with all this "clean" or supposed "free" energy technology then it will be renewable - which means it won't rely on fossil fuels - but this neglects to mention that the sulfur aerosol byproducts then also prevent the CO2 heat effect from being even worse. So as you are aware - this Global Dimming Effect is not considered normally when people talk about switching to renewable energy.

And so when we talk about quantum-based energy or some kind of quantum relativity energy - the article you read references Hal Putoff and he mentions "frequency-cubed spectral distribution" - so what this means is that the virtual energy can be "captured" and utilized. This is already being done in open lab technology by Per Desling who sits on the chair of the Nobel Physics committee. It is in my playlist on my youtube channel - he is "capturing" virtual photons and converting the virtual photons into real photon energy. And also Sir John Pendry is doing this as "metamaterial" research. But yes this research gets classified as top secret very easily or suppressed - as patents are not so much about efficiency but rather market control. And for example I saw a big black equilateral triangle craft up so close I could have hit it with a rock! This craft, the supposed TR-3B - has been researched due to so many sightings, with claims it goes Mach 9 - but also, just as I saw it, goes so slowly it defies gravity - and then can shoot off, disappearing practically. So based on the supposed reports of this craft - it does have some kind of antigravity propulsion. And this should not be too surprising considering the military black budgets have raided other federal agencies for funding - like Social Security and Housing/Welfare - and so the Pentagon does not get audited and literally has tens of trillions of dollars get "disappeared." So for example one person saw an insignia on this black triangle craft and described it and someone else recognized it as very specifically - the Space Innovation Center in Colorado - and so the claims this craft can go into outerspace seems to also be true.

So the claim is that Tesla's inventions did develop based on a free energy ether - and then scientists were hired to essentially reverse engineer his inventions, to convert them into mathematical equations - which is what Steinmetz did. And so then Heaviside and also Whittaker - their mathematical models of electromagnetic power included this math that Hal Putoff refers to - the "frequency-cubed" means there is a reverse time phase or noncommutative phase from the future. This is the virtual energy of the ether. And so the story is that supposedly one of the big wealthy funders - probably J.P. Morgan - realized this was the free energy math and demanded it be removed from Maxwell's early equations. This is definitely true that that equations were changed - and so in early electromagnetic power books it is called "Wattless power." And so when quantum mechanics was developed then the math secret was realized to be noncommutative phase from Heisenberg and then Dirac studying Heisenberg's equation realized it was the same math from Whittaker - who himself had gotten it from Poisson. So in quantum mechanics it's called the Poisson Bracket and it converts the noncommutative phase back to symmetric commutative math.

So anyway yes there is quantum computing being developed that will scale up this virtual energy - and also technology to harness the virtual energy - and one example is even in solar panels, based on nanotechnology. http://ecoechoinvasives.blogspot.com/2017/09/why-solarwind-wont-save-world.html So I did a blog post on this - So this is the "NanoPanel" - it converts the "entropy" of light - the infrared light remitted by the Earth - into electricity - so you get 92% energy efficiency - "When a thin sheet of carbon is rolled into a nanotube, it is manipulated to form a tube of particular diameter and twist, defined as its chirality. Each chirality absorbs a narrow range of optical wavelengths, and because several hundred different chiralities are possible, scientists are now able to reach parts of the electromagnetic spectrum never before used by existing solar devices."

Nanotech Engineering Inc Invents Worlds First Nanopanel™, A Solar Panel that is 92% efficient http://www.abnewswire.com/pressreleases/nanotech-engineering-inc-invents-worlds-first-nanopanel-a-solar-panel-that-is-92-efficient_151008.html

So that is essentially the "free energy" revolution for real - but the question is - can it be scaled up to "capture" all the carbon that has been released - from hundreds of millions of years of storage - sent out in the last 100 years? We have about 5 years to find out. http://nanoscienceinc.com/ And so - the key point here is that Ecology that thrives off the ambient infrared energy of the Earth - it is not "entropy" - because being alive requires this "reverse time" free energy that is also actually proto-consciousness of the Universe. It is called the 5th dimension - a combination of gravity and quantum as a kind of inherent uncertainty, in terms of "science" technology. But in terms of being alive - it transcends the energy of the Sun - it is the ether that creates the whole Universe - the dark energy.

 Boom

Zitterbewegung, chirality, and minimal conductivity in graphene

 It has been recently demonstrated experimentally that graphene, or single-layer carbon, is a gapless semiconductor with massless Dirac energy spectrum. A finite conductivity per channel of order of e2/h in the limit of zero temperature and zero charge carrier density is one of the striking features of this system. Here we analyze this peculiarity based on the Kubo and Landauer formulas. The appearance of a finite conductivity without scattering is shown to be a characteristic property of Dirac chiral fermions in two dimensions.
And

Chiral tunnelling and the Klein paradox in graphene

 The so-called Klein paradox—unimpeded penetration of relativistic particles through high and wide potential barriers—is one of the most exotic and counterintuitive consequences of quantum electrodynamics. The phenomenon is discussed in many contexts in particle, nuclear and astro-physics but direct tests of the Klein paradox using elementary particles have so far proved impossible. Here we show that the effect can be tested in a conceptually simple condensed-matter experiment using electrostatic barriers in single- and bi-layer graphene. Owing to the chiral nature of their quasiparticles, quantum tunnelling in these materials becomes highly anisotropic, qualitatively different from the case of normal, non-relativistic electrons. Massless Dirac fermions in graphene allow a close realization of Klein’s gedanken experiment, whereas massive chiral fermions in bilayer graphene offer an interesting complementary system that elucidates the basic physics involved.
 

 So then the secret is that the "antimatter energy" is just reverse spin of the electron - due to relativistic quantum mechanics - that Schroedinger had removed from de Broglie!
I'm citing this pdf - Discrete Symmetry in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
In other words - only by getting rid of the "continuous time" function - is the paradox solved...according to that author...



 And so the quantum coherence originates from the superluminal phase velocity that is relativistic, just as de Broglie formulated in his Law of Phase Harmony cited...



Our post quoted Nanotech's PR, stating that Jeffrey Grossman, Professor of Engineering at MIT verified the technology and said that
“Pound for pound, the new solar cells produce up to 1,000 times more power than conventional photovoltaics”.
https://www.graphene-info.com/chinese-scientists-develop-go-based-3d-conic-device-increase-solar-thermal-conversion 

https://www.graphene-info.com/proton-transport-graphene-may-lead-renewable-energy-production

So first of all, Nanotech's panels are reportedly built from ten layers of graphene and a carbon nanotube forest on top. The CNTs convert the photons to electrons while the graphene is the conducting layer. The company says that this structure enables the high conversion efficiency - while still being very cost effective.

Our readers pointed out the Schockley-Queisser limit - according to research the maximum theoretical limit of PV efficiency is 86.8%. Nanotech, however, says that this limit is only applicable to Silicon, but for Carbon Nanotubes and graphene it does not hold.

Regarding MIT, Nanotech admits that this was a mistake. The original post came from their advertising company which made a wrongful statement. Nanotech later removed that article and post. The quote from MIT was correct - but it had no relation to Nanotech's technology - it was about graphene solar potential in general.

Nanotech posted the technical specification of their panels - actually stating that the cell efficiency is 96.9% and the module efficiency is 94.7%. These results are from the company's own testing, and it has signed up for a third-party test by Intertek which will inspect the panels and provide its own results. The Intertek results are expected within a few months. Towards the end of 2017 Nanotech received its first panel samples, and posted the video you can see below.

where the motion (right or left) of a spin- particle is decided by a measurement of the z-component of its spin. Subsequently, the measurement was replaced by a unitary operator on the internal space, also known as coin space [5,6], determining the evolution of the internal degree of freedom of the system.

An intrinsic relativistic quantum processes of the Dirac field, denoted Zitterbewegung, first considered by Schrödinger [35] and corresponding to a jittering of the mean position for a relativistic particle, is recovered from the QW evolution. The theoretical existence of the quivering motion has been evidenced by numerical simulations of the Dirac equation and of quantum field theory. While Zitterbewegung oscillations cannot be directly observed by current experimental techniques for a Dirac electron since the amplitude should by very small (equal to the Compton wavelength   with m the rest mass of the relativistic particle, namely     m for an electron), solid state and atomic physics provide physical hardware to simulate the phenomenon [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52], and they have recently boosted a renewed interest in the Dirac equation features.
 Geim, A.; Novoselov, K. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

 In this article, we show that the wave equation for a free Dirac electron can be represented in a form that is analogous to Maxwell’s electrodynamics. The electron bispinor wavefunction is explicitly expressed in terms of its real and imaginary components. This leads us to incorporate into it appropriate scalar and pseudo-scalar fields in advance, so that a full symmetry may be accomplished. The Dirac equation then takes on a form similar to that of a set of inhomogeneous Maxwell’s equations involving a particular self-source. We relate plane wave solutions of these equations to waves corresponding to free Dirac electrons, identifying the longitudinal component of the electron motion, together with the corresponding Zitterbewegung (“trembling motion”).
 https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zna.2018.73.issue-4/zna-2017-0328/zna-2017-0328.xml?intcmp=trendmd

 



From the above Chiral Tunnelling and the Klein Paradox on Graphene....




So we have "massless" quasi-particles - and so get phase coherence resonance as quantum tunneling so can have conductance of charge without resistance. The "charge" is created from the noncommutative phase of the positron (virtual or reverse time) momentum in the same wavelength vector as the electron momentum - so in the same relativistic wave function (as with de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony).




Interconnected - being the key word - at the intersection of the graphene lattice.




So - because it is noncommutative phase in the "imaginary" dimension - 3-dimensional phase - you get reverse time at the "same time" - for zero tunneling time -

 

I am researching this now - the company was in "pre-IPO" stage and asking for $30 million to have a scaled up production process. At first investors were incredulous and so they were getting 3rd party verification of their efficiency results. But I have not found any follow up - although their graphene is being used for golf clubs. haha. Yeah this is the secret of noncommutative phase - that I was trying to explain from music theory. It means you have the phase of the reverse time positrons lined up in the bilayer graphene - so the charge the electron can "tunnel" with zero resistance through the graphene as a reverse time phase positron (in zero time).... So it is the secret of what Ramana Maharshi called the "3 in 1 unity" - haha. Or 3 dimensional frequency - at a zero point in space you have opposite frequency/wavelength but the same positive energy as momentum. So then they can "harvest" all the frequencies of light - meaning also infrared and so get the 92% efficiency. Or in music was can say the pitch as Perfect Fifth stays the same even though the "chirality" is noncommutative - the 2/3 is C to F as subharmonic while 3/2 is C to G overtone harmonic - but both are still Perfect Fifth and so in regards to the root tonic - the 1 - or C - the octave as 2 has a zero time phase with 3 as both G and F at the same time. Alain Connes calls this (2, 3, infinity) as his secret of quantum relativity - from music theory. He got the Fields Medal for that secret - which is harder to get than the Nobel Prize. haha. Where's my Fields medal? haha. If these solar panels don't get funded - it's game over - in my view. Oh well - at least the science got figured out....macroquantum resonance that is relativisitic - just as with black hole ether energy. The science even says - this is mathematically only for black hole tunneling and so previously could not be "demonstrated" in a lab....

pdf - Subwavelength "conical" Graphene meta-material - for harvesting of all wavelengths of light

Because it is so thin - then the light is not lost





So it's a metamaterial and the scattering is zero-time tunnelling and with a single layer of graphene it is "massless" whereas with the bi-layer it is "mass" electrons with zero tunnelling - but the "barrier" has to be at 90 degree - as an "infinite" potential.

One of the interesting tunneling phenomena is negative differential resistance (NDR), the basic principle of resonant-tunneling diodes. NDR has been utilized in various semiconductor devices such as frequency multipliers, oscillators, relfection amplifiers, logic switches, and memories.
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep30669?WT.feed_name=subjects_condensed-matter-physics

conduction proceeds by phonon-assisted tunneling (hopping between adjacent wells)38. Under forward bias (V > 0 on graphene),
direction perpendicular to the layers and conduction proceeds by phonon-assisted tunneling (hopping between adjacent wells)38. Under forward bias (V > 0 on graphene), the barrier oxide field increases linearly with the applied electric field2, resulting in a flow of majority carriers (electrons) through SQDs:SiO2 MLs from the substrate (n-Si) to graphene by electron tunneling through minibands, thereby producing a dark current (DC).
So it is called a "dark current" because it is actually reverse time as zero time tunnelling - and due to the thin layer of the graphene - you can trap "subwavelength" of light and conduct it with zero resistance without loss. So you can then trap the whole frequency spectrum of light - the infrared. -













No comments:

Post a Comment