Sunday, November 18, 2018

Why do physicists ignore abrupt global warming? The wrong symmetric math

You might notice that NONE of these physicists discuss abrupt global warming. why? Entropy. So entropy is a classical byproduct of symmetric math. So I recommend looking into Alain Connes (fields medal mathematician) on noncommutative geometry. I'm not saying he's "the answer." No - I've corresponded with Nobel physicist Brian Josephson quite a bit - he practices qigong meditation and realizes that biology is more fundamental than physics. So does Sir Roger Penrose and Professor Basil J. Hiley, another quantum physicist professor I've corresponded with - he realizes biology is interwoven with physics. but again the key issue is the ecological crisis is created from the wrong symmetric math. So Eddie Oshins figured out the secret - based on quantum psychology - from noncommutative math. He collaborated with math professor Louis Kauffman with whom I've corresponded.

So Kauffman argues that complex numbers are inherently noncommutative because 3-D space is based on an odd time iteration - so for the square root of negative one. or negative unity as he calls it. Yes math is actually from music theory and so we can not visualize the 4th dimension of space - like a Klein Bottle - it can not be visualized. But it's proven we can listen faster than time-frequency uncertainty. Listening is nonlinear and noncommutative - and so we can logically infer and LISTEN to the 5th dimension, as quantum biology has realized. So we can't recreated this science in the lab as technology but we can study it in quantum biology. But to "practice" it then it has to be done internally. All growth happens from within. We evolved from the forest where listening was our dominant perception. So now we rely on visual perception as dominant and this has caused a wrong definition of infinity, over the last 5000 years or so. Anyway Louis de Broglie did realize there is an inherent "harmony" to the Universe - the pilot wave model is now being newly embraced. Einstein rejected it as too simple even though Einstein got de Broglie's Ph.d thesis approved. haha. Yes the secret is there is no "invariant" rest mass - but rather eternal motion as time that is an operator, not an external parameter as time is normally considered in physics. So anyway I have more details on my blog http://elixirfield.blogspot.com yes - people grasp for various conceptual models but the noncommutative math model actually is not very well known at all. I figured this out intuitively from music theory logic.

Then I had to keep digging. Alain Connes did his music theory lecture that confirmed my research. But then Eddie Oshins connected it, the noncommutative phase logic, back to meditation and alchemy training. I had to REALLY dig to discover Oshins. No one has heard of him. He was pissed that the quantum consciousness stuff and the holographic model ignored his foundational research. He parted ways with karl Pribram since Pribram could not understand the noncommutative phase logic but instead just relied on the symmetric Fourier analysis. Even Dirac struggled with this - as he realized Heisenberg's matrices are noncommutative math from the Poisson bracket that was used by Whittaker for Maxwell. But the point of the Poisson bracket is to "convert" the noncommutative math back into symmetry. So yes there is a psychological blockage to left brain dominance - it is physiological. The left side vagus nerve does not connect to the right side of the brain!

The joke is on us literally. We say "math works" and Math is beauty as truth as symmetry - but again this IGNORES the ecological crisis. Albert Bartlett pointed this out - the logarithmic/exponential math CAUSED the ecological crisis. haha. Yea - I even debated this with math professor Ian Stewart, author of "Why Beauty is Truth: A History of Symmetry" - and I debated it with math professor Joe Mazur, author of "Euclid in the Rainforest." And then Mazur asked me to pursue my music-math research and he asked me to submit it for publication. haha. Of course it was rejected from a math journal. Mazur is supposed to have a new book published on perception of Time from math - in 2019. It got delayed a year. I corresponded with him about it - he said it would have a chapter on music. I asked him to include precognition. haha. Oh well. Scientists are not willing to really consider these things. But Olivier Costa de Beauregard, the assistant of Louis de Broglie - HE realized that precognition and telekinesis were real. So did astrophysics professor Paul S. Wesson (who also embraced de Broglie). Wesson died just in 2015 but he said this science model explains spiritual phenomenon as well. Pretty amazing. So the skeptics dismissing spiritual paranormal abilities as "woo woo" actually have not researched science ENOUGH. That is what is so funny.

No comments:

Post a Comment