Qigong and T'ai Chi and indigenous healer Ken Cohen on Sinification Science

Recently there has been a new threat launched by the World Health Organization and, I believe, fueled by one of the most science-obsessed countries in the world: The People’s Republic of China. Here is a link to the article I recently wrote on this subject, published in the national Native American newspaper, News from Indian Country

http://www.indiancountrynews.com/index.php/news/indian-and-first-nations/14583-attempts-to-regulate-first-nations-healing-practices

  Ken was trained since his youth by traditional indigenous elders and maintains close ties with his adoptive Cree family in Saskatchewan. His lectures and cultural programs have been hosted by the Mayo Clinic, the Menninger Institute, medical schools, and numerous Native American/First Nations communities. He is currently based near San Diego, California.

I cannot help wonder if China’s policies and attitudes towards indigenous peoples helped shape the scope and recommendations of the WHO document.

Consider these two strange contradictions. Firstly, although China recognizes 55 ethnic minority peoples, it does not recognize the term “indigenous peoples.” Secondly, China signed The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples yet will not implement many of the provisions. As summarized by the IWGA (the International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs), China has forcibly relocated original peoples and virtually eliminated hunter - herder - nomadic lifestyles that had persisted through many thousands of years.8 Why? To promote mining and property development, and in the case of the Evenki tribe to also create the Aoluguya Ethnic Reindeer Resort, a Disney-like theme park that displays, for Chinese tourists, the lifeways of a “backward” people.9

In 1998, Qi Jingfu, former Minister of Agriculture stated, “It is the PRC’s national policy to end the nomadic way of life for all herdsmen by the end of the century.”10

Whether driven by ignorance, nationalism or economics, China’s denial of indigenous rights and knowledge has reached beyond its borders. I cannot count the number of times I have argued with Chinese scholars to counter the Sinocentric and academically unsound notion that “America’s indigenous people came from China, which is why their healing traditions are similar.” I even met a Chinese doctor of TCM who claimed, “Mexico belongs to China; we settled Mexico first.” I am not trying to impugn or ascribe attitudes to the many dedicated physicians and scholars, Chinese or other, who work for the WHO and are sincerely trying to improve worldwide health and quality of living. I am only advising caution, especially when a member nation, not known for its protection of ethnic or environmental rights, may sway, manipulate, or control opinion.

My blogging is pretty much done: Moribundity and the Moebius Strip

I have had half a dozen blogs - and a few people have managed to follow me across cyberspace. Congratulations! I started out on the internet looking for "intellectual self defense" of my intense meditation experiences - my "enlightenment experience" of seeing ghosts, doing strong healing, and smelling cancer non-locally. I have gone into extreme research across the spectrum of academic disciplines. But the conceptual realm is a dead-end of left brain moribundity.

adj. 1721, "about to die," from Middle French moribund (16c.), from Latin moribundus "dying, at the point of death," from mori "to die" (see mortal (adj.)). Figurative sense of "near an end" is from 1837. Related: Moribundity .

As my old high school buddy told me, "Blogs are Dead." He emailed me that about 8 years ago. I didn't listen to him. I'm not on a popularity contest but rather just needed a place to compile and cross-correlate my research and to get critical feedback as usual. I've been lucky enough to correspond with a dozen or so real "professors" in science.

Dr. Michael Persinger - just died. He emailed me back in 2006 that Dr. Andrija Puharich's research was "great under-appreciated" and then he went on to do experiments that corroborated Puharich's research.

Professor Steve Strogatz: He emailed me back that he was researching chronobiology now and so I suggested to him how the meridians were based on 2 hour cycles just as the NIH has shown that dosing melatonin in resonance with its natural peak hour (11 pm to 1 am) then gets best anti-oxidant healing against cancer. Strogatz also admitted that science, due to chaos supercomputers, is now inherently "authoritarian." Strogatz even stated the Riemann Hypothesis (based on the diverging harmonic series) is a "conspiracy between atom and arithmetic, nature and number." I posted that quote online and noticed his promo blurb was then removed from the soft-cover edition of that book.

Stan Gooch: We corresponded via snail mail. No I didn't save his letters but mainly he joked how he wanted to write a new book on how 90% of humanity got psychology wrong. I tried to tell him about the original human culture, the San Bushmen, since Gooch had instead obsessed about the Neanderthals. But ironically a geneticist on t.v. just hypothesized an ancient Homo lineage could have survived in Russia - and we know that the San Bushmen had interbred with our other Homo cousins.

Professor Robert Adair: This was regarding the Higgs Field - before it was discovered. I read his book on physics - and I was skeptical about the Higgs Field. I think that noncommutative geometry solves this condundrum.

Professor GEE McFearSun: that's not how is real name is spelled but he is litigious since people like to do ad hominems against his densely compiled evidence for irrevocable abrupt global warming. Mainly I just shared with him that I believed he was under surveillance since even my own academic activities doing voluntary "policy" work on sustainability proved to bring great attention from the authorities.

Dr. Ruth E. Kastner: I actually passed on her research to Nobel Physicist Brian Josephson who then cited Kastner in his recent talk and so I informed her of this. Whether it was all just a conspiracy I contrived to suit my own fancies, I'll never know. But she shared with me about our mutual piano training as well.

Nobel Physicist Brian Josephson: He at first told me he didn't know music theory well enough to comment on my research. Then he asked me what I thought of his music compositions. Then he thanked me for sending him that quote from Lawrence Domash, that refers to the Josephson Effect via meditation and mantras. Then he said he practices qigong now with another Cambridge colleague. Then he said I didn't understand music theory well enough. haha. So that was a very interesting email correspondence. I still send him occasional research based on his Josephson Effect.

Professor Michael Corballis: Admittedly I went out "on a limb" with this one - but he argued that no other species has - what human language has - multiple syntax layers of meaning aka recursion. I argued that we should consider rather that frequency is asymmetric and an infinite spiral as meaning. So birds might not appear to have recursion but when we factor in the higher harmonics then they do have recursion. His focus is on asymmetry in evolution: Left brain/ right hand dominance. He states that language of humans may have arose as part of tool use - hence the primary association of the left brain with language and right hand with tool use.

Well there's been another half a dozen research scientists I've corresponded with.

Ian Stewart; Joe Mazur; Luigi Borzacchini; Anirban Bandyopadhyay; Stuart Hameroff; Manfred Euler; Victor Grauer; John Curtis Franklin; Louis Kauffman; Mark Serreze; Basil J. Hiley

Yes and many others. Thanks for the critical feedback.

Acoustic Alchemy is a practice done through various asymmetric complementary opposite harmonics, as Dr. Alain Connes summed it up: (2, 3, infinity). It's that simple yet that powerful, as qigong master Chunyi Lin says: the simplest is the most powerful.

From that simple philosophy then a very broad yet very radical critique can be made of science and society. As far as actually practicing the acoustics - this involves meditation and so can not be done by blogging. My initial interest was in demonstrating with hard science, "why" qigong works. I feel I have now made my case - the answer is noncommutative geometry as Eddie Oshins realized, when he worked at SLAC, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. I had discovered this same solution on my own. But I had done so from music theory directly - without all the science jargon to back up my intuition from music training.

So it's been a fun mystery adventure. A few people have followed it. Online I mean. In real life - no one can really figure out what I have "done" with myself. haha. Am I into "religion"? or.... People are not really sure what to make of me.

I don't go around promoting my books - since they are just compilations of my previous research and so not clear reads in any sense. But recently I did show off my books to a relative. I said, "See these are my books to read." She had no idea that I had "written" the books - until I explained to her - no they are really MY books. haha.

Yes they are all "full free preview" on lulu - linked on my previous blog - just scroll down.

I like to "dabble" in science as mythology. So I never do calculations or computations - on a rare moon. I consider writing as a means of communication to be something of a farse. We really can't change what is hard-wired as psychology from out of puberty. Our culture is the opposite of what our original human culture was. This presents a lot of absurdities.

The UN climate panel has officially declared we have 12 years to completely reverse the course of modern civilization before total collapse happens. But that report was being overly optimistic by half! And yet we've all been hard-wired to think there is no way humans could alter the planet as a whole, Mother Nature is just too powerful. Yes we are part of Mother Nature and she is a part of us. So it's all coming back full circle as a Moebius Strip - reversed. I lived very much a backwards lifestyle - like the Trickster indigenous native shaman who had to walk backwards every where. Recently I was chased out of my tepee by some very aggressive chipmunks wanting to get at a mouse nest. haha.

What remains? the Cosmic Mother will Never Be Unveiled! She is Nuit or Nothingness as being a Nut-Case. She is the formless awareness or Wuji of the Universe that is the Absolute Void that radiates light. The pineal gland at 2 centimeters - is our porthole to bend spacetime as spacetime is now known to be bent circular at 2 centimeters. Each of us exists in the 5th dimension with the future and past happening at the same time, at the speed of light as our spiritual ego. We turn that ego around and spacetime itself shifts as an Emptiness vortex that is eternal. We can never see the Emptiness but we can logically infer it or listen to it as harmonics or acoustic alchemy.

Superluminal Evanescent Ghost Group Weak Waves: 1/2 quanta or spin 1/2 ether-awareness

The experimental science is finally checking up with relativistic quantum models that started with de Broglie - the superluminal momentum. Max Born introduced "relativistic mass" in 1920 - and now it is a term rarely used. Someone points out that rather "relativistic momentum" is better accepted now. It is really a matter of whether a quantum or a relativistic "spin" or perspective it taken on the theory.

So what I corroborated today - by reviewing some of my previous links I posted - yes the light is inverse to the particle emitting the light. The particles spacetime shift is then the relativistic mass or relativistic momentum (phononic field) that creates the subharmonic beat of the light being emitted.

 Sweeping beams of light can cast spots moving with superluminal speeds across scattering surfaces. Such faster-than-light speeds are well-known phenomena that do not violate special relativity. It is shown here that under certain circumstances, superluminal spot pair creation and annihilation events can occur that provide unique information to observers. These spot pair events are {\it not} particle pair events -- they are the sudden creation or annihilation of a pair of relatively illuminated spots on a scattering surface. Real spot pair illumination events occur unambiguously on the scattering surface when spot speeds diverge, while virtual spot pair events are observer dependent and perceived only when real spot radial speeds cross the speed of light. Specifically, a virtual spot pair creation event will be observed when a real spot's speed toward the observer drops below c, while a virtual spot pair annihilation event will be observed when a real spot's radial speed away from the observer rises above c. https://www.space.com/28332-faster-than-light-illusion-cosmic-secrets.html

In other words in both relativity and quantum physics - the "observer" very much changes the results of the experiment.


So this physics (pdf)  has yet to even be acknowledged in the "popular science" (i.e. materialistic skeptics) crowd - keen on being rationalistic. When we consider in terms of physical matter - the absorption band - when we achieve "resonance" for that absorption band - then we can achieve this superluminal velocity as the ether-awareness. This is what Mahayana Buddhism means by different levels of consciousness having different levels of emptiness (and vice versa).

So when we realize then that the source of Charge as Yuan Qi energy is the 5th dimension as non-local Spin - we then also realize that time itself is "asymmetric" as Sir Roger Penrose points out. There is a spin to time based on the spin of whether we "turn the light around." The 1/2 spin of light is its relativistic mass (or relativistic momentum). As B.G. Sidharth points out - it is the noncommutative spacetime that gives light mass.



Superluminal signals in science? pdf

 OK so in terms of science - these experiments are still quite controversial. But it just goes to show that such phenomenon as precognition in meditation - such things now have an experimental validation. And as I have quoted Olivier Costa de Beauregard - the physicists realized the connection between precognition and the relativistic quantum results.

This paper investigates the problem of a relativistic Dirac half-integer spin free particle tunneling through a rectangular quantum-mechanical barrier. If the energy difference between the barrier and the particle is positive, and the barrier width is large enough, there is proof that the tunneling may be superluminal. For first spinor components of particle and antiparticle states, the tunneling is always superluminal regardless the barrier width. Conversely, the second spinor components of particle and antiparticle states may be either subluminal or superluminal depending on the barrier width. These results derive from studying the tunneling time in terms of phase time. For the first spinor components of particle and antiparticle states, it is always negative while for the second spinor components of particle and antiparticle states, it is always positive, whatever the height and width of the barrier. In total, the tunneling time always remains positive for particle states while it becomes negative for antiparticle ones. Furthermore, the phase time tends to zero, increasing the potential barrier both for particle and antiparticle states. This agrees with the interpretation of quantum tunneling that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle provides. This study’s results are innovative with respect to those available in the literature. Moreover, they show that the superluminal behaviour of particles occurs in those processes with high-energy confinement.

Superluminal Tunneling of a Relativistic Half-Integer Spin Particle Through a Potential Barrier

pdf link





So as this paper points out, for "science" time is a parameter, not an operator, DESPITE time being a "physical variable conjugated to the energy." (i.e. time-frequency uncertainty).

So by science defining time through geometric space - there is this awkward "measurement problem" when time suddenly is frozen. This is called using a "linear operator" but when we LISTEN to time then hearing is nonlinear.



OK so that paper is June 2018 - pretty recent! So to get a handle on what this science means - for me - I just take a wide-angle approach. I read as many different sources as possible since everyone explains things a little differently. Then I began piecing everything today. I don't waste my time doing calculations - as computers can do calculations much faster. I focus on learning the meaning and concepts involved. But the basic thing is to question everything and to not limit yourself. So I questioned even the Pythagorean Theorem in school - and I held onto that personal challenge. Not until the deepest science has emerged - I had to keep digging - and sure enough - the highest level of science has proved me correct. This stuff is the very opposite of "woo-woo." haha.