Wednesday, May 18, 2022

Is Jack Sarfatti's 1967 Goldstein Theorem paper actually about noncommutativity (as symmetry breaking)? Well yes and no....

 

 Sarfatt, J; Stoneham, A M (1967). The Goldstone theorem and the Jahn-Teller effect. Proceedings of the Physical Society, 91(1), 214–221. doi:10.1088/0370-1328/91/1/331  

 

 Yes that is noncommutativity! I'm surprised he doesn't use the term noncommutative.

 This is the noncommutativity core secret.

 OK so that's why he doesn't mention noncommutativity. He's emphasizing a classical analysis.

Yes the noncommutative analysis has the zero/infinity as a discrete algebraic analysis due to inverse frequency of time - aka "primitive" or "fundamental" or "primordial" time with no wavelength at all! Thereby an inherently radical redefinition of what constitutes geometric length at the small scale of the 5th dimension.

 So the issue here is that Heisenberg realized the observation of measurement of light is inherently noncommutative as Alain Connes points out.

Let's see who cites this paper. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0953-8984/19/25/255208/meta

The earliest ideas of the polaron recognized that the coupling of an electron to ionic vibrations would affect its apparent mass and could effectively immobilize the carrier (self-trapping)..... The phonon modes that initiate self-trapping can be quite different from the longitudinal optic modes usually assumed to dominate.

https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217979210055378 

 Several problems in the field of statistical physics of complex materials and systems (e.g., the chirality of molecules) and the foundations of the microscopic theory of magnetism and superconductivity were discussed in relation to these ideas.

 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/174/1/012045/meta

The following article is Open access

The emergence of gravity as a retro-causal post-inflation macro-quantum-coherent holographic vacuum Higgs-Goldstone field

and

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation Jack Sarfatti and Creon Levit 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 174 012045

 

Dr. Sarfatti: I got initiated by qigong master Effie P. Chow in 1995 when she blew the fuse in the room behind her at St. Mary's University - the security guard wandered in near the end, stating, "just wondering what's going on in here since the fuse got blown in the room behind you." haha. Then I had a dream that I wrote down at 2:30 a.m. since it was more real and more vivid than being awake! I wrote, "I think this dream is going to come true." It came true in great detail three years later - when I was looking at this newspaper photo and suddenly I got this uncanny sensation as I remembered the dream I had since then long forgotten. I drove up to my folks where I had my journal stored to confirm it had come true - of my environmental activists and native americans standing on the roof of a house, holding a banner, to protest for the protection of a sacred "origin" spiritual forest site at the confluence of the Mississippi and Minnesota rivers. So Olivier Costa de Beauregard is definitely correct that precognition is "de facto proven" real by relativistic quantum mechanics.
This screen projects the voxels of our accelerating expanding 3D space hologram image back
from the future - indeed, back to the moment of inflation 13.7 billion years ago in what Igor
Novikov calls a “globally self-consistent” strange loop in time.
To summarize: The area of an observer’s future de Sitter horizon holographically determines
the dark energy density seen by that observer.
Yes I think it's possible for the spiritual masters to merge back to the origin of the universe. I really like the way you explain this.
  This is an example of what Leonard Susskind calls “horizon complementarity” [5],
in analogy with Niels Bohr’s quantum complementarity of wave-particle duality from the non-
commutativity of the Lie algebra of observable operators on qubit Hilbert space fibers over
classical field configuration space.
Nice to see mention of noncommutativity. Thanks!
I would argue though that what Penrose calls the "gravitational potential" as "dark energy" as the negentropic power of life on Earth is the opposite of the entropy of matter. So the attempt of symmetric-based mathematics as applied technology to decrease the entropy of matter on Earth has actually increased the entropy of gravity! I call this the "Strong Misanthropic Principle" as the basis of the ecological crisis, biological annihilation, abrupt global warming, and the aerosol masking effect, etc.
So as per Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and quantum biology based on phonons, we can listen faster than time-frequency uncertainty (up to ten times) that then resonates the microtubules as quantum coherence via the "gravitational potential" before the "collapse." And yet our modern science is based on external observations with time defined by a symmetric spatial measurement - as a linear operator - and so the noncommutativity is lost. If you study Fields Medal math professor Alain Connes - he co-wrote a paper with physicist Carlo Rovelli on how entropy actually originates from the noncommutativity and thus is not actually random. So this corroborates Louis de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony. Just because the noncommutativity is limited to the observable does not mean that by logical inference and listening we can't resonate with the proto-consciousness directly, thereby absorbing the magnetic moment of the virtual photons.
the future de Sitter horizon for a co-moving observer in our universe is a Wheeler-Feynman
perfect absorber – an infinite red shift surface – just like a black hole event horizon is for a static
LNIF observer.
So in alchemy meditation this is turned around and instead the blue light is absorbing virtual photons from the future in order to convert the red shift into a transmutation of creating new gold matter - what's called bilocation or the "yang shen" or golden immortal body. The soul light is the blue light seen internally while externally time slows down. Actually Stuart Hameroff's most read paper on quantum free will does a pretty good job explaining this via the Benjamin Libet experiments (that Fred Alan Wolf also discusses in his paper).
Thanks again,
drew hempel
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

at

No comments:

Post a Comment