"redistribute political power to MUCH MUCH lower levels?" Yes there is a
reason that EVERY congressional district in the US has a major military
contractor - don't want to lose all those "jobs"! haha. Actually the
judge dropped all our charges after I gave my testimonial - saying that
the attorney general should revoke the corporate charter of Alliant Tech
(my dad was the assistant attorney general of Minnesota). Anyway - yes
the political power distribution is hard-wired into our technological
power - both are based on logarithmic/exponential math that goes back to
Plato as the "Greek Miracle."
New Peter Wadhams interview on methane
As for the "methane bomb" that I
mentioned and you responded: "Methane bombs are purely theoretical and
the effects are localized and short lived." Actually I corresponded with
Dr. Mark Serreze on this topic - he is the director of the National
Snow and Ice Data Center in Colorado. At first he said - over a year
ago - he replied to me that "abrupt methane eruptions" were - what was
the term - "sensationalism." Sounds like your view right? But then Dr.
Serreze was quoted last fall saying that the Arctic melting was "Crazy,
Crazy!" So I emailed him again and now he said - well Dr. Natalia
Shakhova is the "expert" on methane in the arctic but he still
considered the Methane Bomb to be a "low probability." Then he sent me a
link to one of her studies. Too funny!
He sent me the SAME link that I
had sent him when I first contacted him. So I replied with the quote
from Dr. Natalia Shakhova about how "each year matters" for the methane
bomb to double global warming immediately. Now if he admits she's the
EXPERT - then why does he still think it's a "low probability"? Also I
sent him her latest published report that repeats once again, when the
ice is gone then the methane bomb will go off. NOW.... Dr. Peter Wadhams
gives us the answer as to why Dr. Mark Serreze doesn't know what he's
talking about.
Serreze is relying on "models" of supercomputers while
both Shakhova and Wadhams have gone to the arctic to do the actual
empirical research. So Wadhams, having gone to the arctic to study the
ice, 50 times - he agrees with Shakhova that the Methane Bomb could go
off any year and its effect will be global. The general issue here is
what Professor Naomi Oreskes identified in her history of science book
on plate tectonics. I was promoting her book around 12 years ago - she
detailed how US scientists rely on Deductive models and so it took US
scientists decades to accept plate tectonics! The Brits in contrast
relied on empirical data.
So then after I read her book on plate
tectonics I was very glad to discover she switched to focusing on global
warming (where the same problem has happened). Of course first she
exposed how the corporate-state junk science has used the PR industry to
cover up and lie and do mass mind control about the problem. haha.
Merchants of Doubt was that book title with a great documentary that
went along with it.
Methane Time Bomb science study
1988? I started a recycling program at my high school, then I started
riding my bicycle to school - it was 15 miles each way so didn't do that
much. But I did fill 2 garbage bags full of JUST cigarette butts along
the Mississippi river...1989? Full time job for Citizens for a Better
environment - rode bicycle to work. 1990? Lived in a cabin in the
wilderness in Alaska - no running water, no electricity, no heat, no
phone, no car, for 4 months, just south of steepest mountain the world.
1991? Joined the University of Wisconsin Greens, began protesting
against US imperial genocide and ecocide. (FBI starts a file on me).
1992? Studied conservation biology and sustainable development for a
college semester in Costa Rica - School for Field Studies.
1994 - finish
a new degree in International Relations with environmental
sustainability option - realize that academic science is completely
against sustainability with economics lying about biology and political
science lying about biology. I get arrested to protest nuclear waste
being stored in the Mississippi river and I get assaulted by a police
officer. 1995 - more protesting against corporate-state destruction of
the planet and I realize we are doomed. - 1996 work for Greenpeace, my
boss tells me that his biggest concern is global warming. After that - I
kept doing activism but mainly just for "fun" - just to fill the time
in - and 1999 - I started at Clean Water Action part time - worked there
for 10 years. Then in 2009 I took off an old 3 speed bicycle - left the
big city - started pulling out all the invasive buckthorn and began
farming. Here we are ten years later - bought some land up north for the
accelerating eco-apocalypse.
YEAH did you see that movie, "The Day
After"? I've pretty much been losing sleep since then.... I saw it on
t.v. when it was released. Great movie!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iyy9n8r16hs 1983 - so I was 12 years
old. So actually I've been losing sleep for 35 years. Nuclear apocalypse
and abrupt global warming ecocide go together.
yes GEE McFearSun's big point is that we need viable ecological habitat
and that the meltdown of the 450 nuclear power plants would destroy such
viable ecological habitat. Your emphasis on the phrase "single human"
is a psychological inversion of what the self-fulfilling prophecy of
Western imperial Platonic Christianity believes, to wit: That because
one single human died, therefore all Christians (who pledge to the
imperial Western system) will survive the apocalypse and be born again
in flesh.
It is a convenient belief but actually originates from the
Platonic concept of the "Unit" as a transcendental materialism of
geometry - the "process" of geometry as an idealistic materialism of
technology. An excellent book exposing this structural drive of the West
is former MIT history professor David F. Noble's book "The Religion of
Technology" and his final book was a follow up - "Myth of the Promised
Land." If you are "not the ONE" (meaning if you truly are NEO) and you
can escape the Matrix to recreate Zion on Earth, then the best of luck
for you. Personally I think you're view is a Westernized anthropocentric
fantasy that is boring.
No comments:
Post a Comment