On Connes, Hiley and Constantin Antonopoulos: music theory as nonlocal time noncommutative meditation

 Basil J. Hiley explains Connes explanation of Heisenberg in this paper on time - that also includes Kauffman.

So as Hiley points out in his vid talk   

normally time is just an outside parameter in quantum physics but the noncommutativity demonstrates the algebra is of time as a process that is nonlocal - with the future information overlapping with the past - what Hiley/Bohm called "process."

The last email response I received from Professor Hiley said this:

 Basil Hiley <basilhiley@gmail.com>

Fri, Nov 3, 2023, 12:49 PM

to me

Thank you Drew.  Loved your paper on Music.   I have had some discussions with a Finnish guy, Timo Laiho who wrote a thesis “Perception, Time and Music Analysis” in 2013.  

Basil.

I feel bad that I did not respond - at least that I recall. Simply because I wanted to savor his reply and I could not think of what to say in response.

Actually now that I see what I wrote to him - I also said "love" first. hahaha.

Anyway let's get back to Heisenberg and music theory. Hiley calls Heisenberg - the "transition frequencies" but they are also considered transition momentums from de Broglie. Of course I'm not a physicist so I'm butchering the terminology and meaning. But I had discussed Connes with Hiley.

 So we can see frequency of m with frequency of n subtracted - this is just as in music theory where you have now "J" in transition. So think of m and n as the home tone or root tonic and the octave.

 

 So what this really means is that the exponent as frequencies are noncommutative, now dependent on the "ordering" of the time-frequency - just as the Perfect Fifth of C to G as overtone turns into the Perfect Fourth as C (octave) to G. Or when the frequency is 3 then it is F as undertone to C and G as overtone to C. When you subtract then you divide and when you add then you multiply with the Perfect Fifth/Fourth as the very first logarithmic equation of Western science!

Heisenberg had discovered the same empirical truth of Pythagorean music theory as meditation philosophy - the "root tonic" is in eternal motion as noncommutative nonlocality of the future information and past information overlapping.

 

 Hiley described music in the same way - and so he could "love" my music article since he had also realized - along with Bohm - that there was this deeper truth to music - along the way Hiley debunks Newton and the Calculus:

 

 

 So when Hiley and Bohm said "pre-space" before spacetime  - they really meant this "extension in time" that is nonlocal with the future affecting the past.

 So then Basil J. Hiley had proven that what he had worked on with Bohm was in fact a noncommutative time nonlocal process.

 This is what Hiley meant by a radical restructuring of physics but it's also why David Bohm emphasized how standard physics had caused our ecological crisis while Hiley pointed out the paranormal was no longer dismissed in physics.

 

 So we can see how precognition would be explained.

 

 So to review Heisenberg's original paper:

 

 https://wucj.lab.westlake.edu.cn/Others/Heisenberg_Quantum_Mechanics.pdf

 above is frequency and now amplitude:

 

 So Heisenberg is saying it's a noncommutative phase of time-frequency!

 Professor Hiley's emphasize - with David Bohm - is that physics is no longer "mechanics" since we exist within nonlocal time!! That this time is also noncommutative has even deeper implications in terms of quantum biology.

 

 So here we have a fascinating analysis on Heisenberg uncertainty.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 So this is the same as 3/2 (G/C) x 2/3 (C/F) - 2/3 (C/F)x3/2(G/C)=0 but it does not  since it does not equal 1.

 

 

 

 

 https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0310127

 Fourier’s known relation, νt ≥ 1/2π, was based on the observation that it is a logical impossibility to determine the frequency at an instand dt = 0. Frequency is by defintion a repetitive phenomenon and hence by definition such as requires a time latitude to be exemplified, if at all.

 Antonopoulos, C. (2005). Making the Quantum of Relevance. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 36(2), 223–241. doi:10.1007/s10838-006-5716-y

 So assuming frequency is 1/2pi

 

 

 https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-is-the-inverse-Fourier-transform-or-vice-versa-scaled-by-1-2-pi-when-the-the-period-of-the-signal-is-infinite-and-not-the-length-of-the-period