I corresponded with Nobel Physicist Brian Josephson several times. He finally told me he's not interested in noncommutativity. If you listen to his Nobel Prize talk - he mentions how the Josephson Effect assumes a spontaneous spacetime symmetry breaking. But standard science assumes an inherent spatial symmetric to space and so the "symmetry breaking" happens from this Platonic Form of a zero dimension of space that is the real number continuum. Noncommutativity is saying that the natural discrete numbers are nonlocal as asymmetric time as eternal motion. See Basil J. Hiley's 2021 talk to Penrose on Emmy mind-matter symposium talk for details. I first contacted Josephson about his music research and he asked me for commentary on his music compositions. hahaha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8R-1pWxWnU&t=219s
see Basil J. Hiley's 2021 symposium talk to Penrose/Hameroff (on the Emmy mind-matter symposium website for the youtube link). Basically light is inherently asymmetric time superluminal momentum as negentropy. This is what powers ghosts as with protoconsciousness.
Josephson started working this this lady - Yardley - who thinks the Circle is some kind of Platonic form but in fact this covers up the time-frequency uncertainty as nonlocal noncommutativity.
Weird - I was JUST remembering last night how Brian Josephson told me about Matthew Manning bent a spoon - so I remembered it wrongly. That is why I bought Matthew Manning's book!
https://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/papers/bell.html
In neuroscience, the flow of time is a conscious experience produced by the brain. But in physics, time is either a process, or a dimension in four-dimensional spacetime geometry. Could all three explanations be correct? The Penrose–Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ theory suggests consciousness is a sequence of discrete, irreversible quantum state reductions occurring at an objective threshold (‘objective reduction’, ‘OR’) a process in fundamental spacetime geometry. These ‘self-collapses’ of the quantum wavefunction are ‘orchestrated’ in microtubules inside brain neurons. Each Orch OR event selects microtubule states which purposefully regulate neuronal functions, and provide sequences of ‘NOW’ moments of conscious experience. Connected to fundamental spacetime geometry by Penrose ‘OR’, consciousness is quantum state reduction, a set of irreversible steps which ‘ratchet forward’ in the fine scale geometry of the universe, creating a flow of time.
https://brill.com/view/journals/time/12/2/article-p158_010.xml
Nope - Hameroff did not truly listen to Hiley's 2021 talk! Dang.
the flow of time exists already always - inherently - even Penrose knows this!! But Penrose admits he's not good at noncommutative math. hahaha.
However in physics (e.g. Carlo Rovelli, see Buonomano & Rovelli, 2021), time is more complicated. Special relativity precludes a ‘global present’, a universal ‘Now’, but time does seem to ‘flow’ from present into the future. The distinction between past and future is presumed to depend on thermodynamics, and hence is statistical only — like eddy currents in rivers, backward time effects are possible. But time is also seen as a dimension, physicists often representing the world as a four-dimensional ‘block universe’ in which all of time exists, and in which particles move along bidirectional worldlines. This view is called ‘eternalism’.
As Buonomano and Rovelli (2021) tell us, physicists want neuroscientists to explain the flow of time, as it is a property of consciousness produced by the brain. Neuroscientists want physicists to explain the flow of time as a feature of reality. Neither can explain consciousness. Could consciousness and the flow of time be one and the same?
No comments:
Post a Comment