I discuss Antigravity Levitation with Nobel Physicist Brian Josephson

Hi Drew,

        This is just to say that as your 2nd comment was unrelated to the subject of the video I’ve deleted it.  Sorry about that!  Which discussion on line were you thinking of in your first comment?

Brian
-------
Brian D. Josephson
Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Cambridge
Director, Mind–Matter Unification Project
Cavendish Laboratory, JJ Thomson Ave, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
WWW: http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10
Tel. +44(0)1223 337260

Hi Brian: Thanks for your kind response and I hope your qigong is going well. Jack mentioned you recently - he's been doing youtube talks about his model for an antigravity spacecraft. I haven't studied Rod Sutherland enough - the scientist Jack is relying on - but it appears to be a "relativization" of quantum physics - using general relativity? Jack said he was having a debate with you and Nick Herbert about the meaning of general relativity. At 23 minutes into the below link Jack says:

everything yeah I'm right now busy arguing with Keith wanzer Nick Herbert and Brian

Josephson about the basics of Relativity okay which I don't think they properly understand and they don't think I

understand it but so we're fighting with each other and we got to get that straightened out

um so what is it from is that yeah I noticed that uh this was from

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HS0M1JQvQ_I

At 57 minutes into this livestream Jack says:

the Maharishi uh who is able to levitate they say

and even Nobel Prize physicist Brian Josephson and the youngest one the youngest men to ever get Nobel Prize in physics

for the very important Josephson in fact he believes that stuff he he got totally brainwashed as a Young Man ruined his

physics career but fortunately he got his feet he did his Nobel Prize work but he's 23 so yeah surely if that is

another thing after that because he's been trying to levitate you know Maharishi and uh but seriously

you see it turns out there may be something to it service there may be because the meta

materials because the microtubules responsible for our Conscious

Jack is relying on this model of reality:

"Sutherland formalized an intuitive action-reaction between waves and particles that I advocated in 1996 at the Tucson Conference (Stuart Hameroff). I got the idea from Bohm and Hiley’s book “Undivided Universe” where they mention “two way relationship” same idea Einstein used to get General Relativity in with the action of spacetime on the free fall of matter is compensated by the reaction of matter back on spacetime that is recognized as the “geometrodynamical field” with material sources. The only reason quantum entanglement is not a stand-alone keyless Command Control Communication Channel (C4) alternative to electromagnetic field signalling, is the violation the action-reaction principle. In Quantum Mechanics (QM) the waves have no sources and that is why we need a classical electromagnetic signal key to locally decrypt the message encoded in the quantum entanglement pattern that is beyond space-time. This changes in Post-Quantum-Mechanics (PQM) for room temperature non-equilibrium “superconductors” found in living matter pumped by metabolism. This was first realized by Herbert Frohlich with whom I had contact in the 1960s and 1970s. Consciousness, telepathy, PK, precognition are all easily understood as PQM phenomena." Jack Sarfatti

Do you have any more information about your debate with Jack re: general relativity?

Thanks,

drew

 On 29 Oct 2022, at 17:27,

Do you have any more information about your debate with Jack re: general relativity?

Well, it is not a scientific debate, that’s for sure, because I only know the basics of GR and have not been following the details.  Jack refers to it as a debate as a matter of self-aggrandisement, I would guess.  However, something I’ve been reading has made me think that SR connects time and space which are different things, which suggests that c is something more important than I had been assuming before.  So it just possible that there could be something to Jack’s theory.  However Wanser doesn’t seem to think much of it and probably Jack is muddled.

Brian

 

 

Fascinating! You know that Jack has been emphasizing Olivier Costa de Beauregard lately and Costa de Beauregard's emphasis was if you just have a retrocasual time signal then it can be superluminal since it's before spacetime. For me this is due to noncommutativity of light. For example B.J. Sidharth has a great quote on this:

Essentially, this noncommutative nature of spacetime is the underlying geometry to which the superluminal nature of a photon can be attributed to.

 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328746839_Space-time_geometry_and_the_velocity_of_light/link/5be34759a6fdcc3a8dc64c3b/download

Of course my perspective is from music theory being noncommutative as per Alain Conne's lecture, "Music of the Sphere."

haha.

What do you think of this please?

thanks again,

drew

p.s. I think Jean Charon was correct about the electron deriving from virtual photons - and this has made a comeback via John G. Williamson relying on Louis de Broglie.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281749668_On_the_nature_of_the_photon_and_the_electron

First Martin van der Mark co-authored the paper, "Light is Heavy" with Gerard 't Hooft and later John G. Wiliamson and Martin van der Mark postulated the electron is actually made of photons. Also Fred Alan Wolf makes this same claim in his "Time Loops" book. Finally Gerard 't Hooft's eternal black hole is based on this same concept and so argues for virtual microscopic black holes at the foundation of matter.

John G. Cramer similarly states that 1/2 spin enables worm holes at weak energy and also the claim is that noncommutative black holes are traversable.

Brian Josephson	10:03 AM (4 hours ago)
to me

I hadn’t picked up what you say about de B before.

Re levitation, Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras says the thing to focus on (and used in the TM-Sidhi practice) is ’the relationship between body and akasha (space), and  the lightness of cotton fibre’.  Stage one is body movements, two is through the air without making effort, and three is actual levitation.  Almost everyone reaches stage two, and I felt I was almost in stage three once when stationary (feeling I was lighter) and once while moving through the air.  It is all about attention, which Jack ignores.  More controversially, at age around 30 I was in a state where I hardly slept, through involvement with research, which led to a problematic state of consciousness which took some years to completely recover from (mentioned in a SciAm interview though no-one seems to have noticed), and on one occasion I felt I was actually weightless and could move myself around with my mind.  I felt awake as normal, but no-one was around in my college room to confirm that what I perceived happening actually was happening.

Brian

 

 

Brian Josephson	12:30 PM (2 hours ago)
to me

Thank you Professor Josephson. I will look for the SciAm interview. That stage of feeling lighter while moving through the air is described as a Tibetan yoga technique by Alexandra Neel. I have had that feeling also - I'm convinced that 1/2 spin causes an antigravity magnetic levitation via a time-reversed signal. In fact there was a recently published experiment in the journal Nature using magnetic spheres that connect via the friction of two glass tube walls. Strangely as the tubes are rotated the spheres rise up against gravity and since it happens regardly of the direction of rotation of the tubes it demonstrates time asymmetry!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gSglh5DkP0 Here is the video with the links in the description. thanks

I am just now reading Michael Grosso's book, "The Man Who Could Fly" about Saint Joseph de Copertino. Actually the teacher I took qigong classes from, qigong grandmaster Chunyi Lin of http://springforestqigong.com shared with us in 2000 at our Level 3 retreat that when he finished his cave meditation at Mt. Qingcheng, he did really levitate!! So he said he did 28 days of nonstop full lotus padmasana meditation in the cave with no sleep the whole time - and during this time the cave completely filled with light and he traveled into heaven - he had experiences with his ancestors and with ancient Daoist masters - including Lao Tzu touching his head.

I find this hard to believe since I doubt Lao Tzu existed as a person just as I doubt Jesus existed as a person. haha. Still the Ishwara needs to be experienced as the Yang Shen or a bilocation of new matter - the golden body - I think. Whereas it is the formless awareness that is the real ether-shakti force - called the Yuan Qi in Daoism or the Emptiness....The Absolute Void that always radiates light! I have experienced this spacetime vortex also! It is explained in chapter 11 of the book, "Taois Yoga: alchemy and immortality" (free online).

Actually when Chunyi Lin shared that levitation story I had recently read the biography of the most famous Thai Buddhist monk, Phra  Acharn Mun. I had ordered the book through interlibrary loan to finish my master's degree through the African Studies Department in self-directed nonwestern meditation (challenging the hierarchical Natural Law of Plato, etc.). That book is now freely online - and in that biography Phra Acharn Mun explains how his meditation partner was levitating next to him. As soon as the partner had the thought, "I am meditating" then he fell back down. So he had to train his samadhi to completely empty out his left brain while he still was visualizing the levitation as a kind of "turning the light" around experience aka the nirvikalpa samadhi.

So it is just as you say where the attention has to focus on the emptiness - I think this is just the same as the Quantum Zeno Effect. For example I found a new experiment that says they can create a quantum wormhole qubit using the quantum Zeno Effect. The nonlocality is maintained at the millisecond time frame while the Quantum Zeno "measurement" takes place at the microsecond (ultrasound frequency directly connects to the microtubule quantum coherence resonance model of Hameroff and Penrose) - thereby preventing the collapse of entanglement while information is processed through the wormhole.

So also Sir John Pendry has now demonstrated in his new "Archimedes' Spiral" circularly polarized light experiment that he can absorb negative frequency, thereby violating the conservation of momentum just as the de Broglie Law of Phase Harmony allows! So previously the only experiment I know of absorbing negative frequencies (and turning them into increased photons) was by using your Josephson Junction! I think I told you about that already.

Strangely on youtube there are a plethora of "science" vids like the "official science" PBS Spacetime channel that claims "virtual photons" don't exist in reality since they are a byproduct of renormalization mathematics. I find it quite amazing how the symmetric rest frame mentality ever since Plato promoting Archytas math of the wrong music theory even causes people to ignore the latest science experiments. haha.

Thanks for acknowledging my mentioning of de Broglie. When I learned of his "Law of Phase Harmony" I was reading the excellent yet rare book by this Italian physicist - Andre someone?

https://scitechdaily.com/entanglement-enhanced-matter-wave-interferometer-now-with-double-the-spookiness/

As described in their paper that was published in the journal Nature on October 19, the Thompson group has combined the spookiness of both entanglement and delocalization to realize a matter-wave interferometer that can sense accelerations with a precision that surpasses the standard quantum limit (a limit on the accuracy of an experimental measurement at a quantum level) for the first time. By doubling down on the spookiness, future quantum sensors will be able to provide more precise navigation, explore for needed natural resources, more precisely determine fundamental constants such as the fine structure and gravitational constants, look more precisely for dark matter, or maybe even one day detect gravitational waves.

....

Later pulses of laser light then reverse the process bringing the quantum wave packets back together so that any changes in the environment such as accelerations or rotations can be sensed by a measurable amount of interference happening to the two parts of the atomic wave packet, much like is done with light fields in normal interferometers, but here with de’Broglie waves, or waves made of matter.

 ournal article THE JOSEPHSON EFFECTS

Donald N. Langenberg, Douglas J. Scalapino and Barry N. Taylor

Scientific American

Vol. 214, No. 5 (May 1966), pp. 30-39 (10 pages)

Published By: Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

to Brian   No, I meant Costa de Beauregard — I had not noticed the ambiguity! Brian Brian Josephson 3:36 PM (1 hour ago) to me