Monday, June 6, 2022

Debunking the ET Alien Tektite claims of Bruce Fenton

 

I debunked this person Bruce Fenton already - see my comments below. thanks
We know frustratingly little about the geographic distribution and demography of the Denisovans, except for the head-scratching finding that Aboriginal Australians and New Guineans are the only people alive today with substantial amounts of Denisovan DNA in their genome. ...“We would like to know a great deal more about Denisovans. But I think it’s important to know that just like the Neanderthals were known from Western Europe and the Near East, the Denisovans were a similar and closely related species that was found across a huge part of Asia,” University of Illinois paleoanthropologist and study co-author Laura Shackelford said. Genome studies have shown that our species, Homo sapiens, interbred with Denisovans as recently as 30,000 years ago. As a result, some modern people share about 5 percent of their DNA with Denisovans including Indigenous populations in Papua New Guinea, Australia and the Philippines, with smaller DNA percentages among the broader Southeast Asian populations. “This discovery [of the molar] is particularly important as it is the first direct evidence of the presence of Denisovans in Southeast Asia,” said Eske Willerslev, director of the Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre and a study co-author. A common ancestor to Denisovans, Neanderthals, and Homo sapiens is thought to have lived in Africa 700,000 to 500,000 years ago, with a branch that led to Denisovans and Neanderthals splitting off 470,000 to 380,000 years ago. Homo sapiens first emerged in Africa roughly 300,000 years ago, then spread worldwide. By 200,000 years ago, four different archaic human species inhabited Asia including the Denisovans, Homo erectus, and diminutive island-dwelling peoples called Homo floresiensis and Homo luzonensis. Our species then joined the fray. Scientists have been searching in northeastern Laos for decades for prehistoric human remains. The cave bearing the tooth was situated near another where 70,000-year-old Homo sapiens remains were found."
Thank you kindly to everyone for checking out my theory, hopefully, it inspires a few people to explore the topics we covered.
3
"We’re comparing tektites with the source of tektites, which is the upper continental crust, to see what changed during the impact," Wang said. "How do you lose volatiles? What kind of volatiles do you lose first? What kind of volatiles will lose you less of? When you lose volatile elements, you don’t lose them evenly." That’s why this average, global view is a key starting point. Once scientists understand how volatile elements are lost in tektites, they can look for the same patterns in lunar samples to determine the conditions under which the Moon formed. In this study, Wang focused on moderately volatile elements, specifically potassium, copper, and zinc. Highly volatile elements, such as hydrogen, evaporate entirely during the tektite-forming process, but the behavior of moderately volatile elements during impact events reveals key details about the formation process for tektites and, by extension, the Moon." "Wang and his fellow researchers will be able to work backward from the products of impact events—tektites and lunar rocks alike—to learn about pre-impact conditions." Though lunar material is fundamentally different from terrestrial tektites, Wang believes the formation process is similar enough, particularly with respect to volatile loss, for scientists to create models describing both. " Implications of K, Cu and Zn isotopes for the formation of tektites lYun Jiang abc Heng Chenc Bruce Fegley Jr.c Katharina Lodders c Weibiao Hsu d Stein B.J acobs ene KunWang(王昆)ce Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Volume 259, 15 August 2019, Pages 170-187
I thought mainstream science now has documented the moon from after striking into Earth - a huge explosion and the moon formed: "The current scientific hypothesis holds that our Moon was born of a calamitous giant impact. "
Tektites are distal impact glasses formed by melting of terrestrial rocks upon hypervelocity meteorite impacts8. Microtektites are the sub-millimeter analogs of tektites, thought to have solidified from smaller droplets of melt. Both tektites and microtektites are ejected from the source crater, travel ballistically, are quenched in flight, and are deposited hundreds to thousands of kilometers away from the source crater, in so-called strewn fields. A key feature of tektites is their volatile-depletion, observed for water, as well as for volatile and moderately volatile elements9. Of the four historically recognized strewn fields, the Australasian tektite and microtektite strewn field is the largest and most recent example. Australasian tektites and microtektites are linked to a hypervelocity impact origin by their geochemical compositions and features characteristic for shock melting: the absence of primary minerals, the presence of lechatelierite and shocked mineral grains in a subset of tektites and microtektites10, as well as the occurrence of high-pressure mineral phases in some tektites11. The recovery of shock metamorphosed rock and unmelted mineral fragments in Australasian microtektite layers in the South China Sea12 further supports the impact origin. Australasian microtektites have been collected from deep-sea sediment cores from the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP), Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP), as well as from piston cores by a variety of oceanographic institutes in over 60 locations in the Indian and western Pacific Oceans and adjacent seas12,13, and from several sediment accumulation traps in Antarctica14,15,16,17.
 
 
at

No comments:

Post a Comment