Even though Science is our Religion and Mythology it still will not Save us from Mother Nature as Apeiron (Harmonia).

thanks for sharing your take on all this. Yes my view that science is actually a religion is not a very popular view, although there is evidence for this. Not many people are interested in investigating that possibility. But then we do have good evidence also that the original human culture lived without war, without rape, and lived sustainably from 100,000 years ago - so 90% of modern biological history. I would say "why not stick with what worked?"! But again this would necessitate actually studying what "worked" for the original human culture. Upon investigation we find a radically different psychophysiology.

Actually Wim Hof also made this discovery based on his study of Tibetan tummo breathing - and he mastered it on his own and then got science to study him. So the irony being that normally we think of nonwestern cultures as being "religious" or subjective woo-woo, etc. But Wim Hof has proven there is actually an ancient advanced science to a psychophysiology of happiness, harmony, health, etc. Oh well. Yes for the last 10,000 years humans have been messed up, with the rise of monocultural farming, especially wheat.

Yes Science is our Mythology - it's like the water we are immersed in. We HAVE to believe that science can "save" us - what other choice do we have? Actually music is the origin of science and music is also the means to understand nonwestern shamanism as well. But music is not "science" per se - it is rather the metaphysics of science. Alain Connes gets into this - he got a Fields Medal in math (much harder to get than a Nobel prize). So I think he's precise or rigorous enough with his science. He did an excellent lecture on music theory - a take on music that corroborates precisely how the ancient, nonwestern shamans understood music theory as well! Only for Connes this nonwestern or noncommutative logic is the key to the unified relativistic quantum science. Anyway Connes wants to try to "fix" the past 2000 years of the wrong symmetric math logic (i.e. the algorithms you refer to).

No - unfortunately Connes won't be able to do that - and other Western scientists similarly want to use commutators to convert the noncommutative phase logic back into standard symmetric math logic. Oh well. At least they "discovered" the secret - like Eddie Oshins did at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. No these are not soft-headed scientists. Oshins realized that nonwestern shamanic meditation as mind-body training i.e. Daoist alchemy as Neigong, the basis for martial arts, was actually the secret of noncommutative phase unified relativistic quantum science. haha. His colleagues at SLAC agreed with him - like math professor Louis Kauffman or H.P. Noyes (the theoretical physics director at SLAC).


Yes the limitation of say "supercomputers" in modeling ecology or global warming - is that the supercomputer iterations are still based on symmetric logistic equations - i.e. Chaos math is still symmetric math. So math professor Steve Strogatz, a chaos expert who worked on the supercomputers, he stated back over 10 years ago that science is now inherently AUTHORITARIAN. Indeed - the supercomputers could care less whether humans get saved or save the planet or whatever. The global warming scientists admit the supercomputers can not take into account all the factors - like cloud cover effects on global warming. Oops.