Eusebius and D.M. Murdock - the mummification of early Christians in Egypt

http://www.truthbeknown.com/isis-the-chrest.html  D.M. Murdock aka Acharya S. - "nails" the Egyptian origins of Jesus Christ.  Interview with Acharya S. starts at 15 minutes - on Christ in Egypt

Anyway here's my final post since I'm officially banned:
Yep I'm back at the U of MN "cavern" for old book storage, reading Bishop Lightfoot's attack on W.R. Cassel's "Supernatural Religion." Lightfoot readily admits that Eusebius was parsing through the writings "of the Ancients" to decide what was authentic or not. Just based on that simple fact alone the spurious nature of the Gospels is evident. Yet Lightfoot argues:

"Of the Gospels the historian will only record anecdotes concerning them. On the other hand, in the case of the Apocalypse mere references and quotations will be mentioned, because they afford important data for arriving at a decision concerning its Canonical authority." (p. 39)

That seems a back-handed strategy at best and at worse a strange way to treat supposedly sacred works. According to Lightfoot the sources for the 4 Gospels are, as per Eusebius:

"As regards these, he [Eusebius]contents himself with preserving any anecdotes which he may have found illustrating the circumstances under which they were written, e.g. the notices of St. Matthew and St. Mark in Papias, and of the Four Gospels in Irenaeus." (p. 46)

Considering how much Lightfoot questions the authenticity of Ignatius and others, besides the fact the Eusebius openly was questioning his sources as being not authentic, the origin of the Gospels disappears into a cloud of smoke. There is much speculation about Papias and Irenaeus and Polycarp but that the Roman Church was fighting off the ascetic Gnostics is quite clear.

Posted by: drew hempel | August 02, 2007 at 01:52 PM

 

So this Barnard author pdf is claiming rather than St. Mark being in Alexandria - it was the Roman "leaves" or codices as the book of St. Mark (instead of the Egyptian Papyrus roll)....



But what Barnard neglects to mention and that D.M. Murdock points out is that Philo is describing the Therapeutae from before any time period they could have "read" the Gospel of Mark!! They were "Christian" before it was possible.

D.M. Murdock is corroborated by others:



pdf link

So Philo is describing Therapeutae - being the SAME as Christians and Eusebius claiming they ARE Christians. haha.



This is quite hilarious! So we have Barnard stating that the "Christians" are proven to have introduced written codices into Alexandria from Roman, and thereby creating the Gospels in the process - in Alexandria. But who "were" these Christians? They were identical to the Therapeutae who used papryus rolls to write down their scriptures....




And so it is essentially admitted outright - the Jewish Egyptians as Therapeutae became the Christians - simply by transferring wholesale their Egyptian (pagan) religion into Judaism via Greek/Roman imperialism (the codices of books as leaves).

Is there evidence of Alexandrian culture influencing the first century Christians?: a question explored through Christian connections to the practice of mummification

Related

Australasian Digital Theses

Publisher

Sydney, Australia : Macquarie University

Date

2015

Date

©2015

Author/Creator

Craig L. Hall - Christian converts were foremost Roman subjects under Roman Law

So this google preview admits the forging of church documents was quite normal in the ideological battle of the different cities.

pdf link on Alexandria




i.e. - Christianity originated from the Therapeutae - just as Eusebius claimed and D.M. Murdock points out!!

the Bible was not even copied down (in 50 copies for the churches in the East) until Eusebius, an Arian bishop, was instructed to create the fiction by Constantine. This book dispells these myths, for research since the days of Sayce and his Hibbert Lectures at Oxford at the end of the nineteenth century, has shown that the Egyptians were far more advanced than any later-day Israel, and it is from Egypt that the Mother of God (Isis) was first termed, and with her husband/brother Osiris and son Horis, became the original trinity--a concept not found in any other scripture (it was an invention by fourth-fifth century trinitarians).