The Dirac Dance and "the Aharonov-Susskind-Bernstein Effect" Observing Noncommutative Phase as de Broglie quantum potential

Eddie Oshins makes reference to the Aharonov-Susskind-Bernstein Effect. So we know Yakir Aharonov (as discussed on this blog) - and Lenny Susskind is also famous (his debate about the black hole information paradox with Hawking). Bernstein refers to the quantum mechanics professor I took a class from at Hampshire College. HJ Bernstein or Herbert J. Bernstein

1967 pdf link on Susskind and Aharonov

So they are stating that in classical physics the 720 degree spin is unobservable since it's noncommutative at 360. But they state in quantum physics it IS observable. No mention of Bernstein though. this 2006 pdf shows the Bernstein connection to Aharonov and Susskind

 Here's another one:

INTERFEROMETRY WITH PARTICLES OF NON-ZERO REST MASS ...

www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/26/017/26017775.pdf

Electric and Magnetic Perturbations; Aharonov-Bohm. Effects. If a particle of charge q is placed in an electromagnetic field the .... However, Bernstein [24J and Aharonov and Susskind [25] argued that this was not necessarily the case under all ...

 So here it is:

Spin Precession During Interferometry of Fermions and the Phase Factor Associated with Rotations Through Radians

HJ Bernstein - Physical Review Letters, 1967 - APS

A proposed experiment which combines spin precession and two-slit interferometry of
unpolarized neutrons is analyzed. The analysis elucidates the connection with a possible
observation of the phase factor (-1) associated with the rotation of a half-integral spin particle …

 OK so this is a fascinating paper.




So now we go back to the video demonstration of the Dirac Dance of electrons (and people)

So the key point here is that instead of assuming a static zero field - there is a magnetic quantum potential field that creates a double refracting medium aka a torque.

So in the "classical case" there has to be "invariance" for the 2pi (360 degree) rotation.
Since the Neutron has no charge then spin can be isolated for testing.



And then




OK so what did Eddie Oshins say about this Aharonov-Susskind-Bernstein Effect?




Notice this is precisely what Lawrence Domash also proposed - and he was a quantum physicist at Hampshire College where Bernstein teaches.

back to Susskind and Aharonov:




So again Eddie Oshins wanted to test this out -




Math Prof. Louis Kauffman gives credit to Eddie Oshins, martial artist, for collaboration in developing this Quaternion Handshake - youtube


So under classical math and physics - there is no way to "isolate" and measure the 1/2 spin "field." But by using neutrons with a background magnetic field - then a non-local phase shift can be detected that is pure spin, via the entanglement of the neutrons (since neutrons have no charge).

Dear Dr. Euler: There was a scientist at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center - Eddie Oshins - who wanted to test his theory of the brain manifesting a spin 1/2 coherence, as a phase shift resonance, due to his realization of Daoist martial arts training as the same as the "Dirac Dance" 720 degree spin. Quantum physicist Lawrence Domash made a similar realization, arguing that mantras in meditation enable a spin 1/2 or 1/2 quanta resonance in the brain. So Oshins referred to the Aharonov-Susskind-Bernstein Effect (of 1967 fame) - regarding using neutrons with the double slit interferometer to prove that 1/2 spin is observable (isolated from charge). Do you think this is possible to test in the human brain also? How do you think such an experiment would be devised? Dr. Harold Atmanspacher has been devising similar experiments but does so through pure psychology, without any actual neuroscience data, that I'm aware of.

thanks,

drew hempel

https://phys.org/news/2015-08-neural-qubits-quantum-cognition-based.html

Fisher claims that the element with the optimal coherence time (Tcoh), and therefore the one ideally poised to host the putative neural qubit should have nuclear spin of 1/2. In a biochemical setting, spin 1/2 nuclei are weakly decohered only by magnetic fields while for spin >1/2 electric fields cause large decoherence. Spin 0 nuclei lack any associated magnetic dipole moment interaction with nuclear magnetic fields